A systematic review of the label accuracy of cannabinoid-based products in regulated markets: is what’s on the label what’s in the product?. Oldfield, K., Ryan, J., Doppen, M., Kung, S., Braithwaite, I., & Newton-Howes, G. Australasian Psychiatry, 29(1):88–96, February, 2021.
Paper doi abstract bibtex 1 download Objectives: To review the literature regarding label accuracy and contamination of medical cannabinoid-based products. Methods: A systematic review with meta-analysis following PRISMA guidelines. This study is registered with PROSPERO (CRD42019131565). Results: Five studies reported label accuracy data ranging between 17% and 86%. Four studies reported contaminants, including pesticides, solvents and AB-FUBINACA. Meta-analysis was limited to the proportion of pesticide-contaminated samples found in two studies (0.25 (95% CI [0.10, 0.40])) and displayed significant heterogeneity. Conclusions: Label inaccuracies and contaminants are found across a spectrum of cannabinoid-based products. The review highlights the paucity and heterogeneity of research relating to cannabinoid-based products in light of changing global legislation. Further robust research is required to support ongoing pharmacovigilance and patient safety.
@article{oldfield_systematic_2021,
title = {A systematic review of the label accuracy of cannabinoid-based products in regulated markets: is what’s on the label what’s in the product?},
volume = {29},
issn = {1039-8562, 1440-1665},
shorttitle = {A systematic review of the label accuracy of cannabinoid-based products in regulated markets},
url = {http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1039856220965334},
doi = {10.1177/1039856220965334},
abstract = {Objectives:
To review the literature regarding label accuracy and contamination of medical cannabinoid-based products.
Methods:
A systematic review with meta-analysis following PRISMA guidelines. This study is registered with PROSPERO (CRD42019131565).
Results:
Five studies reported label accuracy data ranging between 17\% and 86\%. Four studies reported contaminants, including pesticides, solvents and AB-FUBINACA. Meta-analysis was limited to the proportion of pesticide-contaminated samples found in two studies (0.25 (95\% CI [0.10, 0.40])) and displayed significant heterogeneity.
Conclusions:
Label inaccuracies and contaminants are found across a spectrum of cannabinoid-based products. The review highlights the paucity and heterogeneity of research relating to cannabinoid-based products in light of changing global legislation. Further robust research is required to support ongoing pharmacovigilance and patient safety.},
language = {en},
number = {1},
urldate = {2021-04-30},
journal = {Australasian Psychiatry},
author = {Oldfield, Karen and Ryan, John and Doppen, Marjan and Kung, Stacey and Braithwaite, Irene and Newton-Howes, Giles},
month = feb,
year = {2021},
pages = {88--96},
}
Downloads: 1
{"_id":"XeowFai9pLhZ2xAqy","bibbaseid":"oldfield-ryan-doppen-kung-braithwaite-newtonhowes-asystematicreviewofthelabelaccuracyofcannabinoidbasedproductsinregulatedmarketsiswhatsonthelabelwhatsintheproduct-2021","author_short":["Oldfield, K.","Ryan, J.","Doppen, M.","Kung, S.","Braithwaite, I.","Newton-Howes, G."],"bibdata":{"bibtype":"article","type":"article","title":"A systematic review of the label accuracy of cannabinoid-based products in regulated markets: is what’s on the label what’s in the product?","volume":"29","issn":"1039-8562, 1440-1665","shorttitle":"A systematic review of the label accuracy of cannabinoid-based products in regulated markets","url":"http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1039856220965334","doi":"10.1177/1039856220965334","abstract":"Objectives: To review the literature regarding label accuracy and contamination of medical cannabinoid-based products. Methods: A systematic review with meta-analysis following PRISMA guidelines. This study is registered with PROSPERO (CRD42019131565). Results: Five studies reported label accuracy data ranging between 17% and 86%. Four studies reported contaminants, including pesticides, solvents and AB-FUBINACA. Meta-analysis was limited to the proportion of pesticide-contaminated samples found in two studies (0.25 (95% CI [0.10, 0.40])) and displayed significant heterogeneity. Conclusions: Label inaccuracies and contaminants are found across a spectrum of cannabinoid-based products. The review highlights the paucity and heterogeneity of research relating to cannabinoid-based products in light of changing global legislation. Further robust research is required to support ongoing pharmacovigilance and patient safety.","language":"en","number":"1","urldate":"2021-04-30","journal":"Australasian Psychiatry","author":[{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Oldfield"],"firstnames":["Karen"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Ryan"],"firstnames":["John"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Doppen"],"firstnames":["Marjan"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Kung"],"firstnames":["Stacey"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Braithwaite"],"firstnames":["Irene"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Newton-Howes"],"firstnames":["Giles"],"suffixes":[]}],"month":"February","year":"2021","pages":"88–96","bibtex":"@article{oldfield_systematic_2021,\n\ttitle = {A systematic review of the label accuracy of cannabinoid-based products in regulated markets: is what’s on the label what’s in the product?},\n\tvolume = {29},\n\tissn = {1039-8562, 1440-1665},\n\tshorttitle = {A systematic review of the label accuracy of cannabinoid-based products in regulated markets},\n\turl = {http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1039856220965334},\n\tdoi = {10.1177/1039856220965334},\n\tabstract = {Objectives:\n To review the literature regarding label accuracy and contamination of medical cannabinoid-based products.\n \n \n Methods:\n A systematic review with meta-analysis following PRISMA guidelines. This study is registered with PROSPERO (CRD42019131565).\n \n \n Results:\n Five studies reported label accuracy data ranging between 17\\% and 86\\%. Four studies reported contaminants, including pesticides, solvents and AB-FUBINACA. Meta-analysis was limited to the proportion of pesticide-contaminated samples found in two studies (0.25 (95\\% CI [0.10, 0.40])) and displayed significant heterogeneity.\n \n \n Conclusions:\n Label inaccuracies and contaminants are found across a spectrum of cannabinoid-based products. The review highlights the paucity and heterogeneity of research relating to cannabinoid-based products in light of changing global legislation. Further robust research is required to support ongoing pharmacovigilance and patient safety.},\n\tlanguage = {en},\n\tnumber = {1},\n\turldate = {2021-04-30},\n\tjournal = {Australasian Psychiatry},\n\tauthor = {Oldfield, Karen and Ryan, John and Doppen, Marjan and Kung, Stacey and Braithwaite, Irene and Newton-Howes, Giles},\n\tmonth = feb,\n\tyear = {2021},\n\tpages = {88--96},\n}\n\n","author_short":["Oldfield, K.","Ryan, J.","Doppen, M.","Kung, S.","Braithwaite, I.","Newton-Howes, G."],"key":"oldfield_systematic_2021","id":"oldfield_systematic_2021","bibbaseid":"oldfield-ryan-doppen-kung-braithwaite-newtonhowes-asystematicreviewofthelabelaccuracyofcannabinoidbasedproductsinregulatedmarketsiswhatsonthelabelwhatsintheproduct-2021","role":"author","urls":{"Paper":"http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1039856220965334"},"metadata":{"authorlinks":{}},"downloads":1},"bibtype":"article","biburl":"https://api.zotero.org/users/6607533/collections/NYG2RI7X/items?key=hSjrOPQRRHHWY81SKs6CEz45&format=bibtex&limit=100","dataSources":["ydy8iPhP2TsFttgY7","2RD657JdK4hka2DeP","6SkqXiGdfnEhkfeWg","gYp5LQXkoiKhbuLwC","BvvFw2zRfGrfhQ6x4","ZJ4j4Apddh3MpQnDj"],"keywords":[],"search_terms":["systematic","review","label","accuracy","cannabinoid","based","products","regulated","markets","label","product","oldfield","ryan","doppen","kung","braithwaite","newton-howes"],"title":"A systematic review of the label accuracy of cannabinoid-based products in regulated markets: is what’s on the label what’s in the product?","year":2021,"downloads":1}