Risk assessment tools validated for patients undergoing emergency laparotomy: a systematic review. Oliver, C. M., Walker, E., Giannaris, S., Grocott, M. P. W., & Moonesinghe, S. R. British journal of anaesthesia, 115(6):849–860, December, 2015. doi abstract bibtex Emergency laparotomies are performed commonly throughout the world, but one in six patients die within a month of surgery. Current international initiatives to reduce the considerable associated morbidity and mortality are founded upon delivering individualised perioperative care. However, while the identification of high-risk patients requires the routine assessment of individual risk, no method of doing so has been demonstrated to be practical and reliable across the commonly encountered spectrum of presentations, co-morbidities and operative procedures. A systematic review of Embase and Medline identified 20 validation studies assessing 25 risk assessment tools in patients undergoing emergency laparotomy. The most frequently studied general tools were APACHE II, ASA-PS and
@article{oliver_risk_2015,
title = {Risk assessment tools validated for patients undergoing emergency laparotomy: a systematic review.},
volume = {115},
copyright = {(c) The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Journal of Anaesthesia. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.},
issn = {1471-6771 0007-0912},
doi = {10.1093/bja/aev350},
abstract = {Emergency laparotomies are performed commonly throughout the world, but one in six patients die within a month of surgery. Current international initiatives to reduce the considerable associated morbidity and mortality are founded upon delivering individualised perioperative care. However, while the identification of high-risk patients requires the routine assessment of individual risk, no method of doing so has been demonstrated to be practical and reliable across the commonly encountered spectrum of presentations, co-morbidities and operative procedures. A systematic review of Embase and Medline identified 20 validation studies assessing 25 risk assessment tools in patients undergoing emergency laparotomy. The most frequently studied general tools were APACHE II, ASA-PS and},
language = {eng},
number = {6},
journal = {British journal of anaesthesia},
author = {Oliver, C. M. and Walker, E. and Giannaris, S. and Grocott, M. P. W. and Moonesinghe, S. R.},
month = dec,
year = {2015},
pmid = {26537629},
keywords = {APACHE, Emergencies, Humans, Laparotomy/*adverse effects/mortality, Prognosis, Reproducibility of Results, Risk Assessment/*methods, Severity of Illness Index, emergency laparotomy, postoperative mortality, prognostic tool, risk adjustment, risk assessment},
pages = {849--860},
}
Downloads: 0
{"_id":"hAFZQFF7GRyw2ixfA","bibbaseid":"oliver-walker-giannaris-grocott-moonesinghe-riskassessmenttoolsvalidatedforpatientsundergoingemergencylaparotomyasystematicreview-2015","downloads":0,"creationDate":"2019-01-22T11:20:08.514Z","title":"Risk assessment tools validated for patients undergoing emergency laparotomy: a systematic review.","author_short":["Oliver, C. M.","Walker, E.","Giannaris, S.","Grocott, M. P. W.","Moonesinghe, S. R."],"year":2015,"bibtype":"article","biburl":"https://api.zotero.org/groups/2278468/items?key=VdI1Arfo5ouMqRbfhtn5L0oK&format=bibtex&limit=100","bibdata":{"bibtype":"article","type":"article","title":"Risk assessment tools validated for patients undergoing emergency laparotomy: a systematic review.","volume":"115","copyright":"(c) The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Journal of Anaesthesia. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.","issn":"1471-6771 0007-0912","doi":"10.1093/bja/aev350","abstract":"Emergency laparotomies are performed commonly throughout the world, but one in six patients die within a month of surgery. Current international initiatives to reduce the considerable associated morbidity and mortality are founded upon delivering individualised perioperative care. However, while the identification of high-risk patients requires the routine assessment of individual risk, no method of doing so has been demonstrated to be practical and reliable across the commonly encountered spectrum of presentations, co-morbidities and operative procedures. A systematic review of Embase and Medline identified 20 validation studies assessing 25 risk assessment tools in patients undergoing emergency laparotomy. The most frequently studied general tools were APACHE II, ASA-PS and","language":"eng","number":"6","journal":"British journal of anaesthesia","author":[{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Oliver"],"firstnames":["C.","M."],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Walker"],"firstnames":["E."],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Giannaris"],"firstnames":["S."],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Grocott"],"firstnames":["M.","P.","W."],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Moonesinghe"],"firstnames":["S.","R."],"suffixes":[]}],"month":"December","year":"2015","pmid":"26537629","keywords":"APACHE, Emergencies, Humans, Laparotomy/*adverse effects/mortality, Prognosis, Reproducibility of Results, Risk Assessment/*methods, Severity of Illness Index, emergency laparotomy, postoperative mortality, prognostic tool, risk adjustment, risk assessment","pages":"849–860","bibtex":"@article{oliver_risk_2015,\n\ttitle = {Risk assessment tools validated for patients undergoing emergency laparotomy: a systematic review.},\n\tvolume = {115},\n\tcopyright = {(c) The Author 2015. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Journal of Anaesthesia. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.},\n\tissn = {1471-6771 0007-0912},\n\tdoi = {10.1093/bja/aev350},\n\tabstract = {Emergency laparotomies are performed commonly throughout the world, but one in six patients die within a month of surgery. Current international initiatives to reduce the considerable associated morbidity and mortality are founded upon delivering individualised perioperative care. However, while the identification of high-risk patients requires the routine assessment of individual risk, no method of doing so has been demonstrated to be practical and reliable across the commonly encountered spectrum of presentations, co-morbidities and operative procedures. A systematic review of Embase and Medline identified 20 validation studies assessing 25 risk assessment tools in patients undergoing emergency laparotomy. The most frequently studied general tools were APACHE II, ASA-PS and},\n\tlanguage = {eng},\n\tnumber = {6},\n\tjournal = {British journal of anaesthesia},\n\tauthor = {Oliver, C. M. and Walker, E. and Giannaris, S. and Grocott, M. P. W. and Moonesinghe, S. R.},\n\tmonth = dec,\n\tyear = {2015},\n\tpmid = {26537629},\n\tkeywords = {APACHE, Emergencies, Humans, Laparotomy/*adverse effects/mortality, Prognosis, Reproducibility of Results, Risk Assessment/*methods, Severity of Illness Index, emergency laparotomy, postoperative mortality, prognostic tool, risk adjustment, risk assessment},\n\tpages = {849--860},\n}\n\n","author_short":["Oliver, C. M.","Walker, E.","Giannaris, S.","Grocott, M. P. W.","Moonesinghe, S. R."],"key":"oliver_risk_2015","id":"oliver_risk_2015","bibbaseid":"oliver-walker-giannaris-grocott-moonesinghe-riskassessmenttoolsvalidatedforpatientsundergoingemergencylaparotomyasystematicreview-2015","role":"author","urls":{},"keyword":["APACHE","Emergencies","Humans","Laparotomy/*adverse effects/mortality","Prognosis","Reproducibility of Results","Risk Assessment/*methods","Severity of Illness Index","emergency laparotomy","postoperative mortality","prognostic tool","risk adjustment","risk assessment"],"metadata":{"authorlinks":{}}},"search_terms":["risk","assessment","tools","validated","patients","undergoing","emergency","laparotomy","systematic","review","oliver","walker","giannaris","grocott","moonesinghe"],"keywords":["apache","emergencies","humans","laparotomy/*adverse effects/mortality","prognosis","reproducibility of results","risk assessment/*methods","severity of illness index","emergency laparotomy","postoperative mortality","prognostic tool","risk adjustment","risk assessment"],"authorIDs":[],"dataSources":["ivGRqSmQG9yohsm35"]}