@article{ord_new_2015,
	title = {A {New} {Counterexample} to {Prioritarianism}},
	volume = {27},
	issn = {0953-8208, 1741-6183},
	url = {http://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/utilitas/article/new-counterexample-to-prioritarianism/0FA5067E0FBDD805BA206A200DCC09FD},
	doi = {10.1017/S0953820815000059},
	abstract = {Prioritarianism is the moral view that a fixed improvement in someone's well-being matters more the worse off they are. Its supporters argue that it best captures our intuitions about unequal distributions of well-being. I show that prioritarianism sometimes recommends acts that will make things more unequal while simultaneously lowering the total well-being and making things worse for everyone ex ante. Intuitively, there is little to recommend such acts and I take this to be a serious counterexample for prioritarianism.},
	language = {en},
	number = {3},
	urldate = {2019-07-01},
	journal = {Utilitas},
	author = {Ord, Toby},
	month = sep,
	year = {2015},
	pages = {298--302},
}

{"_id":"Kfd5MAWkdAhgBacx7","bibbaseid":"ord-anewcounterexampletoprioritarianism-2015","author_short":["Ord, T."],"bibdata":{"bibtype":"article","type":"article","title":"A New Counterexample to Prioritarianism","volume":"27","issn":"0953-8208, 1741-6183","url":"http://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/utilitas/article/new-counterexample-to-prioritarianism/0FA5067E0FBDD805BA206A200DCC09FD","doi":"10.1017/S0953820815000059","abstract":"Prioritarianism is the moral view that a fixed improvement in someone's well-being matters more the worse off they are. Its supporters argue that it best captures our intuitions about unequal distributions of well-being. I show that prioritarianism sometimes recommends acts that will make things more unequal while simultaneously lowering the total well-being and making things worse for everyone ex ante. Intuitively, there is little to recommend such acts and I take this to be a serious counterexample for prioritarianism.","language":"en","number":"3","urldate":"2019-07-01","journal":"Utilitas","author":[{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Ord"],"firstnames":["Toby"],"suffixes":[]}],"month":"September","year":"2015","pages":"298–302","bibtex":"@article{ord_new_2015,\n\ttitle = {A {New} {Counterexample} to {Prioritarianism}},\n\tvolume = {27},\n\tissn = {0953-8208, 1741-6183},\n\turl = {http://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/utilitas/article/new-counterexample-to-prioritarianism/0FA5067E0FBDD805BA206A200DCC09FD},\n\tdoi = {10.1017/S0953820815000059},\n\tabstract = {Prioritarianism is the moral view that a fixed improvement in someone's well-being matters more the worse off they are. Its supporters argue that it best captures our intuitions about unequal distributions of well-being. I show that prioritarianism sometimes recommends acts that will make things more unequal while simultaneously lowering the total well-being and making things worse for everyone ex ante. Intuitively, there is little to recommend such acts and I take this to be a serious counterexample for prioritarianism.},\n\tlanguage = {en},\n\tnumber = {3},\n\turldate = {2019-07-01},\n\tjournal = {Utilitas},\n\tauthor = {Ord, Toby},\n\tmonth = sep,\n\tyear = {2015},\n\tpages = {298--302},\n}\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n","author_short":["Ord, T."],"key":"ord_new_2015","id":"ord_new_2015","bibbaseid":"ord-anewcounterexampletoprioritarianism-2015","role":"author","urls":{"Paper":"http://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/utilitas/article/new-counterexample-to-prioritarianism/0FA5067E0FBDD805BA206A200DCC09FD"},"metadata":{"authorlinks":{}},"downloads":0,"html":""},"bibtype":"article","biburl":"https://bibbase.org/zotero/daniel.r","dataSources":["bMNYYYE8ALPmpK328"],"keywords":[],"search_terms":["new","counterexample","prioritarianism","ord"],"title":"A New Counterexample to Prioritarianism","year":2015}