@article{ouimet_examining_2015,
	title = {Examining the feasibility and impact of a graduate public administration course in evidence-informed policy},
	volume = {11},
	issn = {1744-2648},
	doi = {10.1332/174426414X14165770542276},
	abstract = {A pilot controlled before-and-after design was used to assess the impact of a new master-level course in evidence-informed policy making on students' basic knowledge in evidence-based practice. The primary outcome variable was the mean percentage of pre-post improvement on the knowledge test. In the treatment group, the mean percentage of pre-post improvement to the knowledge test was 36.9\% (SD 27.5), compared to 11.3\% (SD 19.1) in the control group composed of students exposed to the traditional graduate-level research methodology course in Political Science. However, the mean score on the post-test for the treatment group was only half of the maximum score.},
	number = {2},
	urldate = {2015-01-15},
	journal = {Evidence \& Policy: A Journal of Research, Debate and Practice},
	author = {Ouimet, Mathieu and Lapointe, Luc and Léon, Grégory},
	month = may,
	year = {2015},
	keywords = {Membre RENARD, Santé publique (avant 2021), Science politique économie et gestion (avant 2021)},
	pages = {149--168},
	file = {Ouimet_et_al_2015_Examining_the_feasibility_and_impact_of_a_graduate_public_administration_course.pdf:/Users/jd/Zotero/storage/IFRFI9CG/Ouimet_et_al_2015_Examining_the_feasibility_and_impact_of_a_graduate_public_administration_course.pdf:application/pdf},
}

{"_id":"jWC8XDFnfQ9u9gnib","bibbaseid":"ouimet-lapointe-lon-examiningthefeasibilityandimpactofagraduatepublicadministrationcourseinevidenceinformedpolicy-2015","author_short":["Ouimet, M.","Lapointe, L.","Léon, G."],"bibdata":{"bibtype":"article","type":"article","title":"Examining the feasibility and impact of a graduate public administration course in evidence-informed policy","volume":"11","issn":"1744-2648","doi":"10.1332/174426414X14165770542276","abstract":"A pilot controlled before-and-after design was used to assess the impact of a new master-level course in evidence-informed policy making on students' basic knowledge in evidence-based practice. The primary outcome variable was the mean percentage of pre-post improvement on the knowledge test. In the treatment group, the mean percentage of pre-post improvement to the knowledge test was 36.9% (SD 27.5), compared to 11.3% (SD 19.1) in the control group composed of students exposed to the traditional graduate-level research methodology course in Political Science. However, the mean score on the post-test for the treatment group was only half of the maximum score.","number":"2","urldate":"2015-01-15","journal":"Evidence & Policy: A Journal of Research, Debate and Practice","author":[{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Ouimet"],"firstnames":["Mathieu"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Lapointe"],"firstnames":["Luc"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Léon"],"firstnames":["Grégory"],"suffixes":[]}],"month":"May","year":"2015","keywords":"Membre RENARD, Santé publique (avant 2021), Science politique économie et gestion (avant 2021)","pages":"149–168","file":"Ouimet_et_al_2015_Examining_the_feasibility_and_impact_of_a_graduate_public_administration_course.pdf:/Users/jd/Zotero/storage/IFRFI9CG/Ouimet_et_al_2015_Examining_the_feasibility_and_impact_of_a_graduate_public_administration_course.pdf:application/pdf","bibtex":"@article{ouimet_examining_2015,\n\ttitle = {Examining the feasibility and impact of a graduate public administration course in evidence-informed policy},\n\tvolume = {11},\n\tissn = {1744-2648},\n\tdoi = {10.1332/174426414X14165770542276},\n\tabstract = {A pilot controlled before-and-after design was used to assess the impact of a new master-level course in evidence-informed policy making on students' basic knowledge in evidence-based practice. The primary outcome variable was the mean percentage of pre-post improvement on the knowledge test. In the treatment group, the mean percentage of pre-post improvement to the knowledge test was 36.9\\% (SD 27.5), compared to 11.3\\% (SD 19.1) in the control group composed of students exposed to the traditional graduate-level research methodology course in Political Science. However, the mean score on the post-test for the treatment group was only half of the maximum score.},\n\tnumber = {2},\n\turldate = {2015-01-15},\n\tjournal = {Evidence \\& Policy: A Journal of Research, Debate and Practice},\n\tauthor = {Ouimet, Mathieu and Lapointe, Luc and Léon, Grégory},\n\tmonth = may,\n\tyear = {2015},\n\tkeywords = {Membre RENARD, Santé publique (avant 2021), Science politique économie et gestion (avant 2021)},\n\tpages = {149--168},\n\tfile = {Ouimet_et_al_2015_Examining_the_feasibility_and_impact_of_a_graduate_public_administration_course.pdf:/Users/jd/Zotero/storage/IFRFI9CG/Ouimet_et_al_2015_Examining_the_feasibility_and_impact_of_a_graduate_public_administration_course.pdf:application/pdf},\n}\n\n","author_short":["Ouimet, M.","Lapointe, L.","Léon, G."],"key":"ouimet_examining_2015","id":"ouimet_examining_2015","bibbaseid":"ouimet-lapointe-lon-examiningthefeasibilityandimpactofagraduatepublicadministrationcourseinevidenceinformedpolicy-2015","role":"author","urls":{},"keyword":["Membre RENARD","Santé publique (avant 2021)","Science politique économie et gestion (avant 2021)"],"metadata":{"authorlinks":{}}},"bibtype":"article","biburl":"https://bibbase.org/network/files/bs7WABLKap92MaSyg","dataSources":["skeNoeq6t96xiB3Ja","YR5ZLbuutxJeNmH6C","AnWoPpuLZCGcKjtrb","cqzpSTEeJ8iWonKK8","n5xGCzHpHGEZysypd"],"keywords":["membre renard","santé publique (avant 2021)","science politique économie et gestion (avant 2021)"],"search_terms":["examining","feasibility","impact","graduate","public","administration","course","evidence","informed","policy","ouimet","lapointe","léon"],"title":"Examining the feasibility and impact of a graduate public administration course in evidence-informed policy","year":2015}