Managing Garbage Can Hierarchies. Padgett, J. F. Administrative Science Quarterly; 1980, 25, 4, Dec, 583 604., 25(4 (Dec)):583--604, 1980. abstract bibtex The garbage can model of organization choice presented by Michael D. Cohen et al (see SA 21:2/73G1634) was developed to analyze organizations suffering unclarity as to goals, means, or responsibility for decision making. This theory is operationalized into a stochastic process model for the case of a traditional Weberian bureaucracy, with two purposes: to show how ambiguity may impinge on decision making within a structural setting more familiar to classical organization theory, \& to derive the managerial implications of garbage can theory. Garbage can flows of issues are explicitly embedded within a differentiated chain of command hierarchy, \& are affected by centralization \& personnel policies, subunit conflict, information processing routines, \& standard operating procedures. The presidential control implications of the model amount to unobtrusive management in the extreme. Structural design is emphasized more than tactical machinations. 2 Figures, Appendix. Modified HA (Copyright 1982, Sociological Abstracts, Inc., all rights reserved.)
@article{ padgett_managing_1980,
title = {Managing {Garbage} {Can} {Hierarchies}},
volume = {25},
abstract = {The garbage can model of organization choice presented by Michael D. Cohen et al (see SA 21:2/73G1634) was developed to analyze organizations suffering unclarity as to goals, means, or responsibility for decision making. This theory is operationalized into a stochastic process model for the case of a traditional Weberian bureaucracy, with two purposes: to show how ambiguity may impinge on decision making within a structural setting more familiar to classical organization theory, \& to derive the managerial implications of garbage can theory. Garbage can flows of issues are explicitly embedded within a differentiated chain of command hierarchy, \& are affected by centralization \& personnel policies, subunit conflict, information processing routines, \& standard operating procedures. The presidential control implications of the model amount to unobtrusive management in the extreme. Structural design is emphasized more than tactical machinations. 2 Figures, Appendix. Modified HA (Copyright 1982, Sociological Abstracts, Inc., all rights reserved.)},
number = {4 (Dec)},
journal = {Administrative Science Quarterly; 1980, 25, 4, Dec, 583 604.},
author = {Padgett, John F.},
year = {1980},
pages = {583--604}
}
Downloads: 0
{"_id":"sPkmG7bhw2M2j35rY","bibbaseid":"padgett-managinggarbagecanhierarchies-1980","downloads":0,"creationDate":"2015-04-17T00:35:39.460Z","title":"Managing Garbage Can Hierarchies","author_short":["Padgett, J.<nbsp>F."],"year":1980,"bibtype":"article","biburl":"http://bibbase.org/zotero/djjr","bibdata":{"abstract":"The garbage can model of organization choice presented by Michael D. Cohen et al (see SA 21:2/73G1634) was developed to analyze organizations suffering unclarity as to goals, means, or responsibility for decision making. This theory is operationalized into a stochastic process model for the case of a traditional Weberian bureaucracy, with two purposes: to show how ambiguity may impinge on decision making within a structural setting more familiar to classical organization theory, \\& to derive the managerial implications of garbage can theory. Garbage can flows of issues are explicitly embedded within a differentiated chain of command hierarchy, \\& are affected by centralization \\& personnel policies, subunit conflict, information processing routines, \\& standard operating procedures. The presidential control implications of the model amount to unobtrusive management in the extreme. Structural design is emphasized more than tactical machinations. 2 Figures, Appendix. Modified HA (Copyright 1982, Sociological Abstracts, Inc., all rights reserved.)","author":["Padgett, John F."],"author_short":["Padgett, J.<nbsp>F."],"bibtex":"@article{ padgett_managing_1980,\n title = {Managing {Garbage} {Can} {Hierarchies}},\n volume = {25},\n abstract = {The garbage can model of organization choice presented by Michael D. Cohen et al (see SA 21:2/73G1634) was developed to analyze organizations suffering unclarity as to goals, means, or responsibility for decision making. This theory is operationalized into a stochastic process model for the case of a traditional Weberian bureaucracy, with two purposes: to show how ambiguity may impinge on decision making within a structural setting more familiar to classical organization theory, \\& to derive the managerial implications of garbage can theory. Garbage can flows of issues are explicitly embedded within a differentiated chain of command hierarchy, \\& are affected by centralization \\& personnel policies, subunit conflict, information processing routines, \\& standard operating procedures. The presidential control implications of the model amount to unobtrusive management in the extreme. Structural design is emphasized more than tactical machinations. 2 Figures, Appendix. Modified HA (Copyright 1982, Sociological Abstracts, Inc., all rights reserved.)},\n number = {4 (Dec)},\n journal = {Administrative Science Quarterly; 1980, 25, 4, Dec, 583 604.},\n author = {Padgett, John F.},\n year = {1980},\n pages = {583--604}\n}","bibtype":"article","id":"padgett_managing_1980","journal":"Administrative Science Quarterly; 1980, 25, 4, Dec, 583 604.","key":"padgett_managing_1980","number":"4 (Dec)","pages":"583--604","title":"Managing Garbage Can Hierarchies","type":"article","volume":"25","year":"1980","bibbaseid":"padgett-managinggarbagecanhierarchies-1980","role":"author","urls":{},"downloads":0},"search_terms":["managing","garbage","hierarchies","padgett"],"keywords":[],"authorIDs":[],"dataSources":["Xm6L6ijSnPNgxubpW"]}