Rethinking the Link Between Categorization and Prejudice Within the Social Cognition Perspective. Park, B. & Judd, C. M. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 9(2):108–130, May, 2005. ![Rethinking the Link Between Categorization and Prejudice Within the Social Cognition Perspective [link]](https://bibbase.org/img/filetypes/link.svg "link")
Paper doi abstract bibtex For the past 40 years, social psychological research on stereotyping and prejudice in the United States has been dominated by the social cognition perspective, which has emphasized the important role of basic categorization processes in intergroup dynamics. An inadvertent consequence of this approach has been a disproportionate focus on social categorization as a causal factor in intergroup animosity and, accordingly, an emphasis on approaches that minimize category distinctions as the solution to intergroup conflict. Though recognizing the crucial function of categorization, we question existing support for the hypothesis that the perception of strong group differences necessarily results in greater intergroup bias. Given that it is neither feasible nor ultimately desirable to imagine that social categories can be eliminated, we suggest that a more useful approach is one that promotes intergroup harmony even while recognizing and valuing the distinctions that define our social world.
@article{park_rethinking_2005,
title = {Rethinking the {Link} {Between} {Categorization} and {Prejudice} {Within} the {Social} {Cognition} {Perspective}},
volume = {9},
issn = {1088-8683, 1532-7957},
url = {http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1207/s15327957pspr0902_2},
doi = {10.1207/s15327957pspr0902_2},
abstract = {For the past 40 years, social psychological research on stereotyping and prejudice in the United States has been dominated by the social cognition perspective, which has emphasized the important role of basic categorization processes in intergroup dynamics. An inadvertent consequence of this approach has been a disproportionate focus on social categorization as a causal factor in intergroup animosity and, accordingly, an emphasis on approaches that minimize category distinctions as the solution to intergroup conflict. Though recognizing the crucial function of categorization, we question existing support for the hypothesis that the perception of strong group differences necessarily results in greater intergroup bias. Given that it is neither feasible nor ultimately desirable to imagine that social categories can be eliminated, we suggest that a more useful approach is one that promotes intergroup harmony even while recognizing and valuing the distinctions that define our social world.},
language = {en},
number = {2},
urldate = {2024-03-16},
journal = {Personality and Social Psychology Review},
author = {Park, Bernadette and Judd, Charles M.},
month = may,
year = {2005},
pages = {108--130},
}
Downloads: 0
{"_id":"uehhNFvihkbuaYd8e","bibbaseid":"park-judd-rethinkingthelinkbetweencategorizationandprejudicewithinthesocialcognitionperspective-2005","author_short":["Park, B.","Judd, C. M."],"bibdata":{"bibtype":"article","type":"article","title":"Rethinking the Link Between Categorization and Prejudice Within the Social Cognition Perspective","volume":"9","issn":"1088-8683, 1532-7957","url":"http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1207/s15327957pspr0902_2","doi":"10.1207/s15327957pspr0902_2","abstract":"For the past 40 years, social psychological research on stereotyping and prejudice in the United States has been dominated by the social cognition perspective, which has emphasized the important role of basic categorization processes in intergroup dynamics. An inadvertent consequence of this approach has been a disproportionate focus on social categorization as a causal factor in intergroup animosity and, accordingly, an emphasis on approaches that minimize category distinctions as the solution to intergroup conflict. Though recognizing the crucial function of categorization, we question existing support for the hypothesis that the perception of strong group differences necessarily results in greater intergroup bias. Given that it is neither feasible nor ultimately desirable to imagine that social categories can be eliminated, we suggest that a more useful approach is one that promotes intergroup harmony even while recognizing and valuing the distinctions that define our social world.","language":"en","number":"2","urldate":"2024-03-16","journal":"Personality and Social Psychology Review","author":[{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Park"],"firstnames":["Bernadette"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Judd"],"firstnames":["Charles","M."],"suffixes":[]}],"month":"May","year":"2005","pages":"108–130","bibtex":"@article{park_rethinking_2005,\n\ttitle = {Rethinking the {Link} {Between} {Categorization} and {Prejudice} {Within} the {Social} {Cognition} {Perspective}},\n\tvolume = {9},\n\tissn = {1088-8683, 1532-7957},\n\turl = {http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1207/s15327957pspr0902_2},\n\tdoi = {10.1207/s15327957pspr0902_2},\n\tabstract = {For the past 40 years, social psychological research on stereotyping and prejudice in the United States has been dominated by the social cognition perspective, which has emphasized the important role of basic categorization processes in intergroup dynamics. An inadvertent consequence of this approach has been a disproportionate focus on social categorization as a causal factor in intergroup animosity and, accordingly, an emphasis on approaches that minimize category distinctions as the solution to intergroup conflict. Though recognizing the crucial function of categorization, we question existing support for the hypothesis that the perception of strong group differences necessarily results in greater intergroup bias. Given that it is neither feasible nor ultimately desirable to imagine that social categories can be eliminated, we suggest that a more useful approach is one that promotes intergroup harmony even while recognizing and valuing the distinctions that define our social world.},\n\tlanguage = {en},\n\tnumber = {2},\n\turldate = {2024-03-16},\n\tjournal = {Personality and Social Psychology Review},\n\tauthor = {Park, Bernadette and Judd, Charles M.},\n\tmonth = may,\n\tyear = {2005},\n\tpages = {108--130},\n}\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n","author_short":["Park, B.","Judd, C. M."],"key":"park_rethinking_2005","id":"park_rethinking_2005","bibbaseid":"park-judd-rethinkingthelinkbetweencategorizationandprejudicewithinthesocialcognitionperspective-2005","role":"author","urls":{"Paper":"http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1207/s15327957pspr0902_2"},"metadata":{"authorlinks":{}},"html":""},"bibtype":"article","biburl":"https://bibbase.org/zotero/dishore","dataSources":["xoexFPcKZgur4xsCJ"],"keywords":[],"search_terms":["rethinking","link","between","categorization","prejudice","within","social","cognition","perspective","park","judd"],"title":"Rethinking the Link Between Categorization and Prejudice Within the Social Cognition Perspective","year":2005}