Differentiating bipolar I and II disorders and the likely contribution of DSM-5 classification to their cleavage. Parker, G. & Fletcher, K. Journal of Affective Disorders, 152-154:57–64, January, 2014. ![Differentiating bipolar I and II disorders and the likely contribution of DSM-5 classification to their cleavage [link]](https://bibbase.org/img/filetypes/link.svg "link")
Paper doi abstract bibtex Current diagnostic criteria define bipolar I (BP I) and bipolar II (BP II) disorders as distinct conditions, differing only slightly by clinical features. This review seeks to identify commonalities and differentiating features across the two sub-types, and emphasize that differences in causes and treatments are likely to be highly dependent on the diagnostic criteria used to define and differentiate the two conditions. We undertake a literature review of candidate clinical features that might be anticipated to vary or be shared across BP I and BP II disorders, and consider the impact of DSM definition on such applied findings. Studies respecting DSM-IV differentiation of BP I and BP II disorders have generated relatively few differences across the conditions, which may reflect definitional similarity or commonalities across the two conditions. As DSM-5 decision rules are similar to those used by DSM-IV to differentiate BP I and BP II disorders, we argue for application studies employing DSM-5 decisions to examine the differential impact of three features that weight BP I assignment (i.e. psychosis, hospitalization and/or impairment) and examine other sets of differentiating criteria.
@article{parker_differentiating_2014,
title = {Differentiating bipolar {I} and {II} disorders and the likely contribution of {DSM}-5 classification to their cleavage},
volume = {152-154},
issn = {01650327},
url = {http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165032713007350},
doi = {10.1016/j.jad.2013.10.006},
abstract = {Current diagnostic criteria define bipolar I (BP I) and bipolar II (BP II) disorders as distinct conditions, differing only slightly by clinical features. This review seeks to identify commonalities and differentiating features across the two sub-types, and emphasize that differences in causes and treatments are likely to be highly dependent on the diagnostic criteria used to define and differentiate the two conditions. We undertake a literature review of candidate clinical features that might be anticipated to vary or be shared across BP I and BP II disorders, and consider the impact of DSM definition on such applied findings. Studies respecting DSM-IV differentiation of BP I and BP II disorders have generated relatively few differences across the conditions, which may reflect definitional similarity or commonalities across the two conditions. As DSM-5 decision rules are similar to those used by DSM-IV to differentiate BP I and BP II disorders, we argue for application studies employing DSM-5 decisions to examine the differential impact of three features that weight BP I assignment (i.e. psychosis, hospitalization and/or impairment) and examine other sets of differentiating criteria.},
urldate = {2015-05-22},
journal = {Journal of Affective Disorders},
author = {Parker, Gordon and Fletcher, Kathryn},
month = jan,
year = {2014},
keywords = {Assessment, Bipolar disorder, Depression, Diagnosis, Mood disorders, Treatment},
pages = {57--64},
}
Downloads: 0
{"_id":"NtR5DurhBjqzLMsfk","bibbaseid":"parker-fletcher-differentiatingbipolariandiidisordersandthelikelycontributionofdsm5classificationtotheircleavage-2014","author_short":["Parker, G.","Fletcher, K."],"bibdata":{"bibtype":"article","type":"article","title":"Differentiating bipolar I and II disorders and the likely contribution of DSM-5 classification to their cleavage","volume":"152-154","issn":"01650327","url":"http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165032713007350","doi":"10.1016/j.jad.2013.10.006","abstract":"Current diagnostic criteria define bipolar I (BP I) and bipolar II (BP II) disorders as distinct conditions, differing only slightly by clinical features. This review seeks to identify commonalities and differentiating features across the two sub-types, and emphasize that differences in causes and treatments are likely to be highly dependent on the diagnostic criteria used to define and differentiate the two conditions. We undertake a literature review of candidate clinical features that might be anticipated to vary or be shared across BP I and BP II disorders, and consider the impact of DSM definition on such applied findings. Studies respecting DSM-IV differentiation of BP I and BP II disorders have generated relatively few differences across the conditions, which may reflect definitional similarity or commonalities across the two conditions. As DSM-5 decision rules are similar to those used by DSM-IV to differentiate BP I and BP II disorders, we argue for application studies employing DSM-5 decisions to examine the differential impact of three features that weight BP I assignment (i.e. psychosis, hospitalization and/or impairment) and examine other sets of differentiating criteria.","urldate":"2015-05-22","journal":"Journal of Affective Disorders","author":[{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Parker"],"firstnames":["Gordon"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Fletcher"],"firstnames":["Kathryn"],"suffixes":[]}],"month":"January","year":"2014","keywords":"Assessment, Bipolar disorder, Depression, Diagnosis, Mood disorders, Treatment","pages":"57–64","bibtex":"@article{parker_differentiating_2014,\n\ttitle = {Differentiating bipolar {I} and {II} disorders and the likely contribution of {DSM}-5 classification to their cleavage},\n\tvolume = {152-154},\n\tissn = {01650327},\n\turl = {http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165032713007350},\n\tdoi = {10.1016/j.jad.2013.10.006},\n\tabstract = {Current diagnostic criteria define bipolar I (BP I) and bipolar II (BP II) disorders as distinct conditions, differing only slightly by clinical features. This review seeks to identify commonalities and differentiating features across the two sub-types, and emphasize that differences in causes and treatments are likely to be highly dependent on the diagnostic criteria used to define and differentiate the two conditions. We undertake a literature review of candidate clinical features that might be anticipated to vary or be shared across BP I and BP II disorders, and consider the impact of DSM definition on such applied findings. Studies respecting DSM-IV differentiation of BP I and BP II disorders have generated relatively few differences across the conditions, which may reflect definitional similarity or commonalities across the two conditions. As DSM-5 decision rules are similar to those used by DSM-IV to differentiate BP I and BP II disorders, we argue for application studies employing DSM-5 decisions to examine the differential impact of three features that weight BP I assignment (i.e. psychosis, hospitalization and/or impairment) and examine other sets of differentiating criteria.},\n\turldate = {2015-05-22},\n\tjournal = {Journal of Affective Disorders},\n\tauthor = {Parker, Gordon and Fletcher, Kathryn},\n\tmonth = jan,\n\tyear = {2014},\n\tkeywords = {Assessment, Bipolar disorder, Depression, Diagnosis, Mood disorders, Treatment},\n\tpages = {57--64},\n}\n\n","author_short":["Parker, G.","Fletcher, K."],"key":"parker_differentiating_2014","id":"parker_differentiating_2014","bibbaseid":"parker-fletcher-differentiatingbipolariandiidisordersandthelikelycontributionofdsm5classificationtotheircleavage-2014","role":"author","urls":{"Paper":"http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0165032713007350"},"keyword":["Assessment","Bipolar disorder","Depression","Diagnosis","Mood disorders","Treatment"],"metadata":{"authorlinks":{}},"html":""},"bibtype":"article","biburl":"https://bibbase.org/zotero/asrommel","dataSources":["J8fbWsdsy3xAaB3pX"],"keywords":["assessment","bipolar disorder","depression","diagnosis","mood disorders","treatment"],"search_terms":["differentiating","bipolar","disorders","contribution","dsm","classification","cleavage","parker","fletcher"],"title":"Differentiating bipolar I and II disorders and the likely contribution of DSM-5 classification to their cleavage","year":2014}