@article{pautassoFocusingPublicationQuality2013,
  title = {Focusing on Publication Quality Would Benefit All Researchers},
  author = {Pautasso, Marco},
  year = {2013},
  month = jun,
  volume = {28},
  pages = {318--320},
  issn = {0169-5347},
  doi = {10.1016/j.tree.2013.03.004},
  abstract = {Highlights [::] Would focusing on publication quality favour female ecologists? [::] There is no difference between female versus male ecologists in the positive correlation between total (or average) number of citations and number of publications. [::] Thus, focusing on publication quality would benefit both female and male researchers. [::] To fix the still leaky pipeline in ecology, more radical action is needed.},
  journal = {Trends in Ecology \& Evolution},
  keywords = {*imported-from-citeulike-INRMM,~INRMM-MiD:c-12282323,publication-bias,publish-or-perish,science-ethics,scientific-communication},
  lccn = {INRMM-MiD:c-12282323},
  number = {6}
}

{"_id":"MGQbpaRPKpZP4bLPu","bibbaseid":"pautasso-focusingonpublicationqualitywouldbenefitallresearchers-2013","downloads":0,"creationDate":"2016-06-22T10:20:00.963Z","title":"Focusing on Publication Quality Would Benefit All Researchers","author_short":["Pautasso, M."],"year":2013,"bibtype":"article","biburl":"https://sharefast.me/php/download.php?id=zOUKvA&token=29","bibdata":{"bibtype":"article","type":"article","title":"Focusing on Publication Quality Would Benefit All Researchers","author":[{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Pautasso"],"firstnames":["Marco"],"suffixes":[]}],"year":"2013","month":"June","volume":"28","pages":"318–320","issn":"0169-5347","doi":"10.1016/j.tree.2013.03.004","abstract":"Highlights [::] Would focusing on publication quality favour female ecologists? [::] There is no difference between female versus male ecologists in the positive correlation between total (or average) number of citations and number of publications. [::] Thus, focusing on publication quality would benefit both female and male researchers. [::] To fix the still leaky pipeline in ecology, more radical action is needed.","journal":"Trends in Ecology & Evolution","keywords":"*imported-from-citeulike-INRMM,~INRMM-MiD:c-12282323,publication-bias,publish-or-perish,science-ethics,scientific-communication","lccn":"INRMM-MiD:c-12282323","number":"6","bibtex":"@article{pautassoFocusingPublicationQuality2013,\n title = {Focusing on Publication Quality Would Benefit All Researchers},\n author = {Pautasso, Marco},\n year = {2013},\n month = jun,\n volume = {28},\n pages = {318--320},\n issn = {0169-5347},\n doi = {10.1016/j.tree.2013.03.004},\n abstract = {Highlights [::] Would focusing on publication quality favour female ecologists? [::] There is no difference between female versus male ecologists in the positive correlation between total (or average) number of citations and number of publications. [::] Thus, focusing on publication quality would benefit both female and male researchers. [::] To fix the still leaky pipeline in ecology, more radical action is needed.},\n journal = {Trends in Ecology \\& Evolution},\n keywords = {*imported-from-citeulike-INRMM,~INRMM-MiD:c-12282323,publication-bias,publish-or-perish,science-ethics,scientific-communication},\n lccn = {INRMM-MiD:c-12282323},\n number = {6}\n}\n\n","author_short":["Pautasso, M."],"key":"pautassoFocusingPublicationQuality2013","id":"pautassoFocusingPublicationQuality2013","bibbaseid":"pautasso-focusingonpublicationqualitywouldbenefitallresearchers-2013","role":"author","urls":{},"keyword":["*imported-from-citeulike-INRMM","~INRMM-MiD:c-12282323","publication-bias","publish-or-perish","science-ethics","scientific-communication"],"downloads":0},"search_terms":["focusing","publication","quality","benefit","researchers","pautasso"],"keywords":["publication-bias","publish-or-perish","science-ethics","scientific-communication","*imported-from-citeulike-inrmm","~inrmm-mid:c-12282323"],"authorIDs":[],"dataSources":["5S2zj2hKW8TWTkuMq"]}