Analog errors in quantum annealing: doom and hope. Pearson, A., Mishra, A., Hen, I., & Lidar, D. A. npj Quantum Information, 5(1):107, 2019. ![Analog errors in quantum annealing: doom and hope [link]](https://bibbase.org/img/filetypes/link.svg "link")
Paper doi abstract bibtex Quantum annealing has the potential to provide a speedup over classical algorithms in solving optimization problems. Just as for any other quantum device, suppressing Hamiltonian control errors will be necessary before quantum annealers can achieve speedups. Such analog control errors are known to lead to \$}{\$J\$}{\$J-chaos, wherein the probability of obtaining the optimal solution, encoded as the ground state of the intended Hamiltonian, varies widely depending on the control error. Here, we show that \$}{\$J\$}{\$J-chaos causes a catastrophic failure of quantum annealing, in that the scaling of the time-to-solution metric becomes worse than that of a deterministic (exhaustive) classical solver. We demonstrate this empirically using random Ising spin glass problems run on the two latest generations of the D-Wave quantum annealers. We then proceed to show that this doomsday scenario can be mitigated using a simple error suppression and correction scheme known as quantum annealing correction (QAC). By using QAC, the time-to-solution scaling of the same D-Wave devices is improved to below that of the classical upper bound, thus restoring hope in the speedup prospects of quantum annealing.
@article{npjQ,
Abstract = {Quantum annealing has the potential to provide a speedup over classical algorithms in solving optimization problems. Just as for any other quantum device, suppressing Hamiltonian control errors will be necessary before quantum annealers can achieve speedups. Such analog control errors are known to lead to {\$}{\$}J{\$}{\$}J-chaos, wherein the probability of obtaining the optimal solution, encoded as the ground state of the intended Hamiltonian, varies widely depending on the control error. Here, we show that {\$}{\$}J{\$}{\$}J-chaos causes a catastrophic failure of quantum annealing, in that the scaling of the time-to-solution metric becomes worse than that of a deterministic (exhaustive) classical solver. We demonstrate this empirically using random Ising spin glass problems run on the two latest generations of the D-Wave quantum annealers. We then proceed to show that this doomsday scenario can be mitigated using a simple error suppression and correction scheme known as quantum annealing correction (QAC). By using QAC, the time-to-solution scaling of the same D-Wave devices is improved to below that of the classical upper bound, thus restoring hope in the speedup prospects of quantum annealing.},
Author = {Pearson, Adam and Mishra, Anurag and Hen, Itay and Lidar, Daniel A.},
Da = {2019/11/28},
Date-Added = {2020-05-11 16:55:01 -0700},
Date-Modified = {2020-05-11 16:55:01 -0700},
Doi = {10.1038/s41534-019-0210-7},
Id = {Pearson2019},
Isbn = {2056-6387},
Journal = {npj Quantum Information},
Number = {1},
Pages = {107},
Title = {Analog errors in quantum annealing: doom and hope},
Ty = {JOUR},
Url = {https://doi.org/10.1038/s41534-019-0210-7},
Volume = {5},
Year = {2019},
Bdsk-Url-1 = {https://doi.org/10.1038/s41534-019-0210-7}}
Downloads: 0
{"_id":"qfvCa9u3QZofk7FKJ","bibbaseid":"pearson-mishra-hen-lidar-analogerrorsinquantumannealingdoomandhope-2019","author_short":["Pearson, A.","Mishra, A.","Hen, I.","Lidar, D. A."],"bibdata":{"bibtype":"article","type":"article","abstract":"Quantum annealing has the potential to provide a speedup over classical algorithms in solving optimization problems. Just as for any other quantum device, suppressing Hamiltonian control errors will be necessary before quantum annealers can achieve speedups. Such analog control errors are known to lead to \\$}{\\$J\\$}{\\$J-chaos, wherein the probability of obtaining the optimal solution, encoded as the ground state of the intended Hamiltonian, varies widely depending on the control error. Here, we show that \\$}{\\$J\\$}{\\$J-chaos causes a catastrophic failure of quantum annealing, in that the scaling of the time-to-solution metric becomes worse than that of a deterministic (exhaustive) classical solver. We demonstrate this empirically using random Ising spin glass problems run on the two latest generations of the D-Wave quantum annealers. We then proceed to show that this doomsday scenario can be mitigated using a simple error suppression and correction scheme known as quantum annealing correction (QAC). By using QAC, the time-to-solution scaling of the same D-Wave devices is improved to below that of the classical upper bound, thus restoring hope in the speedup prospects of quantum annealing.","author":[{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Pearson"],"firstnames":["Adam"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Mishra"],"firstnames":["Anurag"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Hen"],"firstnames":["Itay"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Lidar"],"firstnames":["Daniel","A."],"suffixes":[]}],"da":"2019/11/28","date-added":"2020-05-11 16:55:01 -0700","date-modified":"2020-05-11 16:55:01 -0700","doi":"10.1038/s41534-019-0210-7","id":"Pearson2019","isbn":"2056-6387","journal":"npj Quantum Information","number":"1","pages":"107","title":"Analog errors in quantum annealing: doom and hope","ty":"JOUR","url":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41534-019-0210-7","volume":"5","year":"2019","bdsk-url-1":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41534-019-0210-7","bibtex":"@article{npjQ,\n\tAbstract = {Quantum annealing has the potential to provide a speedup over classical algorithms in solving optimization problems. Just as for any other quantum device, suppressing Hamiltonian control errors will be necessary before quantum annealers can achieve speedups. Such analog control errors are known to lead to {\\$}{\\$}J{\\$}{\\$}J-chaos, wherein the probability of obtaining the optimal solution, encoded as the ground state of the intended Hamiltonian, varies widely depending on the control error. Here, we show that {\\$}{\\$}J{\\$}{\\$}J-chaos causes a catastrophic failure of quantum annealing, in that the scaling of the time-to-solution metric becomes worse than that of a deterministic (exhaustive) classical solver. We demonstrate this empirically using random Ising spin glass problems run on the two latest generations of the D-Wave quantum annealers. We then proceed to show that this doomsday scenario can be mitigated using a simple error suppression and correction scheme known as quantum annealing correction (QAC). By using QAC, the time-to-solution scaling of the same D-Wave devices is improved to below that of the classical upper bound, thus restoring hope in the speedup prospects of quantum annealing.},\n\tAuthor = {Pearson, Adam and Mishra, Anurag and Hen, Itay and Lidar, Daniel A.},\n\tDa = {2019/11/28},\n\tDate-Added = {2020-05-11 16:55:01 -0700},\n\tDate-Modified = {2020-05-11 16:55:01 -0700},\n\tDoi = {10.1038/s41534-019-0210-7},\n\tId = {Pearson2019},\n\tIsbn = {2056-6387},\n\tJournal = {npj Quantum Information},\n\tNumber = {1},\n\tPages = {107},\n\tTitle = {Analog errors in quantum annealing: doom and hope},\n\tTy = {JOUR},\n\tUrl = {https://doi.org/10.1038/s41534-019-0210-7},\n\tVolume = {5},\n\tYear = {2019},\n\tBdsk-Url-1 = {https://doi.org/10.1038/s41534-019-0210-7}}\n\n","author_short":["Pearson, A.","Mishra, A.","Hen, I.","Lidar, D. A."],"bibbaseid":"pearson-mishra-hen-lidar-analogerrorsinquantumannealingdoomandhope-2019","role":"author","urls":{"Paper":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41534-019-0210-7"},"metadata":{"authorlinks":{}}},"bibtype":"article","biburl":"https://bibbase.org/f/6moQXZADybdshmwar/itayhen.bib","dataSources":["Z6jWac7o9Cbcwv4Kf","CSYFA7qwQGMgrz3JD"],"keywords":[],"search_terms":["analog","errors","quantum","annealing","doom","hope","pearson","mishra","hen","lidar"],"title":"Analog errors in quantum annealing: doom and hope","year":2019}