Regulation of pesticides: A comparative analysis*. Pelaez, V., da Silva, L. R., & Araújo, E. B. Science and Public Policy, 40(5):644–656, October, 2013. ![Regulation of pesticides: A comparative analysis* [link]](https://bibbase.org/img/filetypes/link.svg "link")
Paper doi abstract bibtex This paper compares three internationally representative regulatory frameworks for pesticides. We look first at the USA, which shifted regulatory powers from the US Department of Agriculture to the Environmental Protection Agency in the early 1970s, during a historical transition from a predominantly economic to a predominantly social regulatory model. The second country is Brazil, currently the world’s largest consumer of pesticides, followed by the USA in second place. In the early 1990s, Brazil’s new regulatory model adopted a troika of decision-making ministries (agriculture, health and environment), with the prevalence of economic over social-environmental interests. The third case is the regulatory framework adopted in 2011 by the EU, where shifts in risk-assessment criteria and corporate financial liability reveal a prevalence of concerns involving social-environmental regulation.
@article{pelaez_regulation_2013,
title = {Regulation of pesticides: {A} comparative analysis*},
volume = {40},
issn = {0302-3427},
shorttitle = {Regulation of pesticides},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/sct020},
doi = {10.1093/scipol/sct020},
abstract = {This paper compares three internationally representative regulatory frameworks for pesticides. We look first at the USA, which shifted regulatory powers from the US Department of Agriculture to the Environmental Protection Agency in the early 1970s, during a historical transition from a predominantly economic to a predominantly social regulatory model. The second country is Brazil, currently the world’s largest consumer of pesticides, followed by the USA in second place. In the early 1990s, Brazil’s new regulatory model adopted a troika of decision-making ministries (agriculture, health and environment), with the prevalence of economic over social-environmental interests. The third case is the regulatory framework adopted in 2011 by the EU, where shifts in risk-assessment criteria and corporate financial liability reveal a prevalence of concerns involving social-environmental regulation.},
number = {5},
urldate = {2024-11-11},
journal = {Science and Public Policy},
author = {Pelaez, Victor and da Silva, Letícia Rodrigues and Araújo, Eduardo Borges},
month = oct,
year = {2013},
pages = {644--656},
}
Downloads: 0
{"_id":"qwKn89T6wB8KcaCY9","bibbaseid":"pelaez-dasilva-arajo-regulationofpesticidesacomparativeanalysis-2013","author_short":["Pelaez, V.","da Silva, L. R.","Araújo, E. B."],"bibdata":{"bibtype":"article","type":"article","title":"Regulation of pesticides: A comparative analysis*","volume":"40","issn":"0302-3427","shorttitle":"Regulation of pesticides","url":"https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/sct020","doi":"10.1093/scipol/sct020","abstract":"This paper compares three internationally representative regulatory frameworks for pesticides. We look first at the USA, which shifted regulatory powers from the US Department of Agriculture to the Environmental Protection Agency in the early 1970s, during a historical transition from a predominantly economic to a predominantly social regulatory model. The second country is Brazil, currently the world’s largest consumer of pesticides, followed by the USA in second place. In the early 1990s, Brazil’s new regulatory model adopted a troika of decision-making ministries (agriculture, health and environment), with the prevalence of economic over social-environmental interests. The third case is the regulatory framework adopted in 2011 by the EU, where shifts in risk-assessment criteria and corporate financial liability reveal a prevalence of concerns involving social-environmental regulation.","number":"5","urldate":"2024-11-11","journal":"Science and Public Policy","author":[{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Pelaez"],"firstnames":["Victor"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":["da"],"lastnames":["Silva"],"firstnames":["Letícia","Rodrigues"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Araújo"],"firstnames":["Eduardo","Borges"],"suffixes":[]}],"month":"October","year":"2013","pages":"644–656","bibtex":"@article{pelaez_regulation_2013,\n\ttitle = {Regulation of pesticides: {A} comparative analysis*},\n\tvolume = {40},\n\tissn = {0302-3427},\n\tshorttitle = {Regulation of pesticides},\n\turl = {https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/sct020},\n\tdoi = {10.1093/scipol/sct020},\n\tabstract = {This paper compares three internationally representative regulatory frameworks for pesticides. We look first at the USA, which shifted regulatory powers from the US Department of Agriculture to the Environmental Protection Agency in the early 1970s, during a historical transition from a predominantly economic to a predominantly social regulatory model. The second country is Brazil, currently the world’s largest consumer of pesticides, followed by the USA in second place. In the early 1990s, Brazil’s new regulatory model adopted a troika of decision-making ministries (agriculture, health and environment), with the prevalence of economic over social-environmental interests. The third case is the regulatory framework adopted in 2011 by the EU, where shifts in risk-assessment criteria and corporate financial liability reveal a prevalence of concerns involving social-environmental regulation.},\n\tnumber = {5},\n\turldate = {2024-11-11},\n\tjournal = {Science and Public Policy},\n\tauthor = {Pelaez, Victor and da Silva, Letícia Rodrigues and Araújo, Eduardo Borges},\n\tmonth = oct,\n\tyear = {2013},\n\tpages = {644--656},\n}\n\n\n\n","author_short":["Pelaez, V.","da Silva, L. R.","Araújo, E. B."],"key":"pelaez_regulation_2013","id":"pelaez_regulation_2013","bibbaseid":"pelaez-dasilva-arajo-regulationofpesticidesacomparativeanalysis-2013","role":"author","urls":{"Paper":"https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/sct020"},"metadata":{"authorlinks":{}}},"bibtype":"article","biburl":"https://bibbase.org/zotero-group/lisageorge/5712602","dataSources":["wyomW5pZBH3FGfJW9"],"keywords":[],"search_terms":["regulation","pesticides","comparative","analysis","pelaez","da silva","araújo"],"title":"Regulation of pesticides: A comparative analysis*","year":2013}