Digital analysis and technical specifications. Penzel, T., Hirshkowitz, M., Harsh, J., Chervin, R., D., Butkov, N., Kryger, M., Malow, B., Vitiello, M., V., Silber, M., H., Kushida, C., a., & Chesson, A., L. Journal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine, 3(2):109-20, 3, 2007.
Paper abstract bibtex Digital acquisition and analysis of sleep data has become more common over the past 20 years. Many investigators have developed strategies to record and analyze sleep in a quantitative way. Initially, digital recording and analysis were restricted by technical limitations. With current technology, the technical limitations of computer acquisition, data storage, and analysis are less constraining, and the development of recommendations for the specifications and scoring of sleep can be more clearly guided by the goal of characterizing physiologic phenomena. In order to develop recommendations and specifications regarding digital acquisition and analysis, a literature search, evidence review, and standardized consensus process focused on 5 questions regarding computer-assisted sleep recording and analysis. These questions included: (1) the reliability of computerized scoring of sleep stages, (2) the analysis of elemental events and waveforms, (3) the physiological and/or clinical significance of digitally-analyzed signals, (4) the importance of proposed changes in standardized scoring that could incorporate digital analysis, and (5) the potential advantages and disadvantages of computerized sleep recordings. Of 154 studies identified by the search, 119 were found to be suitable for evidence review. The evidence review suggested that computer scoring and quantitative analysis of sleep is still in the formative stage of development. For many technical specification decisions, little or no direct evidence was found, although basic engineering principles or standard practices provided some rationale which was utilized to develop the recommendations formulated during the subsequent UCLA/Rand standardized consensus process.
@article{
id = {b9ccb105-2be8-397e-9cd0-73786c62cefc},
title = {Digital analysis and technical specifications.},
type = {article},
year = {2007},
identifiers = {[object Object]},
keywords = {Diagnosis, Computer-Assisted,Diagnosis, Computer-Assisted: instrumentation,Humans,Polysomnography,Polysomnography: instrumentation,Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted,Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted: instrumentat,Sleep Disorders,Sleep Disorders: diagnosis},
created = {2010-08-16T17:47:32.000Z},
pages = {109-20},
volume = {3},
websites = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17557421},
month = {3},
file_attached = {true},
profile_id = {6d353feb-efe4-367e-84a2-0815eb9ca878},
group_id = {ba0deb47-e19a-3151-83cc-b6262d5edb6e},
last_modified = {2013-07-09T23:57:16.000Z},
read = {true},
starred = {false},
authored = {false},
confirmed = {true},
hidden = {false},
citation_key = {Penzel2007},
client_data = {"desktop_id":"25ed779a-74f1-466d-a568-670085d15a1f"},
abstract = {Digital acquisition and analysis of sleep data has become more common over the past 20 years. Many investigators have developed strategies to record and analyze sleep in a quantitative way. Initially, digital recording and analysis were restricted by technical limitations. With current technology, the technical limitations of computer acquisition, data storage, and analysis are less constraining, and the development of recommendations for the specifications and scoring of sleep can be more clearly guided by the goal of characterizing physiologic phenomena. In order to develop recommendations and specifications regarding digital acquisition and analysis, a literature search, evidence review, and standardized consensus process focused on 5 questions regarding computer-assisted sleep recording and analysis. These questions included: (1) the reliability of computerized scoring of sleep stages, (2) the analysis of elemental events and waveforms, (3) the physiological and/or clinical significance of digitally-analyzed signals, (4) the importance of proposed changes in standardized scoring that could incorporate digital analysis, and (5) the potential advantages and disadvantages of computerized sleep recordings. Of 154 studies identified by the search, 119 were found to be suitable for evidence review. The evidence review suggested that computer scoring and quantitative analysis of sleep is still in the formative stage of development. For many technical specification decisions, little or no direct evidence was found, although basic engineering principles or standard practices provided some rationale which was utilized to develop the recommendations formulated during the subsequent UCLA/Rand standardized consensus process.},
bibtype = {article},
author = {Penzel, Thomas and Hirshkowitz, Max and Harsh, John and Chervin, Ron D and Butkov, Nic and Kryger, Meir and Malow, Beth and Vitiello, Michael V and Silber, Michael H and Kushida, Clete a and Chesson, Andrew L},
journal = {Journal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine},
number = {2}
}
Downloads: 0
{"_id":"6JzpdG9TdLYB2puvh","authorIDs":[],"author_short":["Penzel, T.","Hirshkowitz, M.","Harsh, J.","Chervin, R., D.","Butkov, N.","Kryger, M.","Malow, B.","Vitiello, M., V.","Silber, M., H.","Kushida, C., a.","Chesson, A., L."],"bibbaseid":"penzel-hirshkowitz-harsh-chervin-butkov-kryger-malow-vitiello-silber-kushida-chesson-digitalanalysisandtechnicalspecifications-2007","bibdata":{"id":"b9ccb105-2be8-397e-9cd0-73786c62cefc","title":"Digital analysis and technical specifications.","type":"article","year":"2007","identifiers":"[object Object]","keywords":"Diagnosis, Computer-Assisted,Diagnosis, Computer-Assisted: instrumentation,Humans,Polysomnography,Polysomnography: instrumentation,Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted,Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted: instrumentat,Sleep Disorders,Sleep Disorders: diagnosis","created":"2010-08-16T17:47:32.000Z","pages":"109-20","volume":"3","websites":"http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17557421","month":"3","file_attached":"true","profile_id":"6d353feb-efe4-367e-84a2-0815eb9ca878","group_id":"ba0deb47-e19a-3151-83cc-b6262d5edb6e","last_modified":"2013-07-09T23:57:16.000Z","read":"true","starred":"false","authored":"false","confirmed":"true","hidden":"false","citation_key":"Penzel2007","client_data":"\"desktop_id\":\"25ed779a-74f1-466d-a568-670085d15a1f\"","abstract":"Digital acquisition and analysis of sleep data has become more common over the past 20 years. Many investigators have developed strategies to record and analyze sleep in a quantitative way. Initially, digital recording and analysis were restricted by technical limitations. With current technology, the technical limitations of computer acquisition, data storage, and analysis are less constraining, and the development of recommendations for the specifications and scoring of sleep can be more clearly guided by the goal of characterizing physiologic phenomena. In order to develop recommendations and specifications regarding digital acquisition and analysis, a literature search, evidence review, and standardized consensus process focused on 5 questions regarding computer-assisted sleep recording and analysis. These questions included: (1) the reliability of computerized scoring of sleep stages, (2) the analysis of elemental events and waveforms, (3) the physiological and/or clinical significance of digitally-analyzed signals, (4) the importance of proposed changes in standardized scoring that could incorporate digital analysis, and (5) the potential advantages and disadvantages of computerized sleep recordings. Of 154 studies identified by the search, 119 were found to be suitable for evidence review. The evidence review suggested that computer scoring and quantitative analysis of sleep is still in the formative stage of development. For many technical specification decisions, little or no direct evidence was found, although basic engineering principles or standard practices provided some rationale which was utilized to develop the recommendations formulated during the subsequent UCLA/Rand standardized consensus process.","bibtype":"article","author":"Penzel, Thomas and Hirshkowitz, Max and Harsh, John and Chervin, Ron D and Butkov, Nic and Kryger, Meir and Malow, Beth and Vitiello, Michael V and Silber, Michael H and Kushida, Clete a and Chesson, Andrew L","journal":"Journal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine","number":"2","bibtex":"@article{\n id = {b9ccb105-2be8-397e-9cd0-73786c62cefc},\n title = {Digital analysis and technical specifications.},\n type = {article},\n year = {2007},\n identifiers = {[object Object]},\n keywords = {Diagnosis, Computer-Assisted,Diagnosis, Computer-Assisted: instrumentation,Humans,Polysomnography,Polysomnography: instrumentation,Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted,Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted: instrumentat,Sleep Disorders,Sleep Disorders: diagnosis},\n created = {2010-08-16T17:47:32.000Z},\n pages = {109-20},\n volume = {3},\n websites = {http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17557421},\n month = {3},\n file_attached = {true},\n profile_id = {6d353feb-efe4-367e-84a2-0815eb9ca878},\n group_id = {ba0deb47-e19a-3151-83cc-b6262d5edb6e},\n last_modified = {2013-07-09T23:57:16.000Z},\n read = {true},\n starred = {false},\n authored = {false},\n confirmed = {true},\n hidden = {false},\n citation_key = {Penzel2007},\n client_data = {\"desktop_id\":\"25ed779a-74f1-466d-a568-670085d15a1f\"},\n abstract = {Digital acquisition and analysis of sleep data has become more common over the past 20 years. Many investigators have developed strategies to record and analyze sleep in a quantitative way. Initially, digital recording and analysis were restricted by technical limitations. With current technology, the technical limitations of computer acquisition, data storage, and analysis are less constraining, and the development of recommendations for the specifications and scoring of sleep can be more clearly guided by the goal of characterizing physiologic phenomena. In order to develop recommendations and specifications regarding digital acquisition and analysis, a literature search, evidence review, and standardized consensus process focused on 5 questions regarding computer-assisted sleep recording and analysis. These questions included: (1) the reliability of computerized scoring of sleep stages, (2) the analysis of elemental events and waveforms, (3) the physiological and/or clinical significance of digitally-analyzed signals, (4) the importance of proposed changes in standardized scoring that could incorporate digital analysis, and (5) the potential advantages and disadvantages of computerized sleep recordings. Of 154 studies identified by the search, 119 were found to be suitable for evidence review. The evidence review suggested that computer scoring and quantitative analysis of sleep is still in the formative stage of development. For many technical specification decisions, little or no direct evidence was found, although basic engineering principles or standard practices provided some rationale which was utilized to develop the recommendations formulated during the subsequent UCLA/Rand standardized consensus process.},\n bibtype = {article},\n author = {Penzel, Thomas and Hirshkowitz, Max and Harsh, John and Chervin, Ron D and Butkov, Nic and Kryger, Meir and Malow, Beth and Vitiello, Michael V and Silber, Michael H and Kushida, Clete a and Chesson, Andrew L},\n journal = {Journal of clinical sleep medicine : JCSM : official publication of the American Academy of Sleep Medicine},\n number = {2}\n}","author_short":["Penzel, T.","Hirshkowitz, M.","Harsh, J.","Chervin, R., D.","Butkov, N.","Kryger, M.","Malow, B.","Vitiello, M., V.","Silber, M., H.","Kushida, C., a.","Chesson, A., L."],"urls":{"Paper":"http://bibbase.org/service/mendeley/6d353feb-efe4-367e-84a2-0815eb9ca878/file/54e61e7f-6afe-8ad5-2b03-b4a22d052a66/Digital analysis and technical specifications..pdf"},"bibbaseid":"penzel-hirshkowitz-harsh-chervin-butkov-kryger-malow-vitiello-silber-kushida-chesson-digitalanalysisandtechnicalspecifications-2007","role":"author","keyword":["Diagnosis","Computer-Assisted","Diagnosis","Computer-Assisted: instrumentation","Humans","Polysomnography","Polysomnography: instrumentation","Signal Processing","Computer-Assisted","Signal Processing","Computer-Assisted: instrumentat","Sleep Disorders","Sleep Disorders: diagnosis"],"downloads":0},"bibtype":"article","biburl":null,"creationDate":"2014-10-29T08:44:43.422Z","downloads":0,"keywords":["diagnosis","computer-assisted","diagnosis","computer-assisted: instrumentation","humans","polysomnography","polysomnography: instrumentation","signal processing","computer-assisted","signal processing","computer-assisted: instrumentat","sleep disorders","sleep disorders: diagnosis"],"search_terms":["digital","analysis","technical","specifications","penzel","hirshkowitz","harsh","chervin","butkov","kryger","malow","vitiello","silber","kushida","chesson"],"title":"Digital analysis and technical specifications.","year":2007}