@book{peukert2019,
	title = {Is it about {Human}(itie)s? {Experiences} from {Software} {Projects} across three {Faculties}},
	isbn = {978-3-88579-689-3},
	shorttitle = {与人有关吗？来自三个学院软件项目的经验},
	url = {http://dl.gi.de/handle/20.500.12116/25048},
	abstract = {Considering the experience with software development in research projects in three different faculties, it is argued here that the issue of underspecification and finding out what is really wanted is not restricted to the Humanities. Rather, it occurs in Science and Social Science seemingly at the same ratio. However, in absence of representational data, statements at which exact shares the phenomenon really occurs, lead up the garden path. Hence, the question is raised whether the focus of software development in the Humanities should shift to human per se describing the fact that underspecification is a human trait of complex planning and problem solving behavior, but independent from the faculty’s epistemology. And possibly it comes to the fore in science more bluntly and it is particularly apparent in the Humanities, i.e. less blended. In fact, any specific account of software development in the Humanities is misleading because the focus on the Humanities blends the hermeneutics inherent in scientific work in general.

【摘要翻译】考虑到在三个不同院系的研究项目中开发软件的经验，本文认为，"不够明确 "和 "找出真正想要的东西 "的问题并不局限于人文学科。相反，科学和社会科学似乎也存在同样的问题。然而，在缺乏代表性数据的情况下，关于现象真正发生的确切比例的表述，会让人误入歧途。因此，人们提出了一个问题，即人文科学软件开发的重点是否应转移到人类本身，即描述欠规范是复杂规划和问题解决行为的人类特征，但与教师的认识论无关。而在科学领域，它可能更直白地凸显出来，在人文学科中则尤为明显，即较少混合。事实上，对人文学科软件开发的任何具体描述都会产生误导，因为对人文学科的关注融合了一般科学工作中固有的诠释学。},
	language = {en},
	urldate = {2019-10-10},
	publisher = {Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V.},
	author = {Peukert, Hagen},
	year = {2019},
	note = {🏷️ /unread},
	keywords = {/unread},
}

{"_id":"vpYbaxHEFxy43rB69","bibbaseid":"peukert-isitabouthumanitiesexperiencesfromsoftwareprojectsacrossthreefaculties-2019","author_short":["Peukert, H."],"bibdata":{"bibtype":"book","type":"book","title":"Is it about Human(itie)s? Experiences from Software Projects across three Faculties","isbn":"978-3-88579-689-3","shorttitle":"与人有关吗？来自三个学院软件项目的经验","url":"http://dl.gi.de/handle/20.500.12116/25048","abstract":"Considering the experience with software development in research projects in three different faculties, it is argued here that the issue of underspecification and finding out what is really wanted is not restricted to the Humanities. Rather, it occurs in Science and Social Science seemingly at the same ratio. However, in absence of representational data, statements at which exact shares the phenomenon really occurs, lead up the garden path. Hence, the question is raised whether the focus of software development in the Humanities should shift to human per se describing the fact that underspecification is a human trait of complex planning and problem solving behavior, but independent from the faculty’s epistemology. And possibly it comes to the fore in science more bluntly and it is particularly apparent in the Humanities, i.e. less blended. In fact, any specific account of software development in the Humanities is misleading because the focus on the Humanities blends the hermeneutics inherent in scientific work in general. 【摘要翻译】考虑到在三个不同院系的研究项目中开发软件的经验，本文认为，\"不够明确 \"和 \"找出真正想要的东西 \"的问题并不局限于人文学科。相反，科学和社会科学似乎也存在同样的问题。然而，在缺乏代表性数据的情况下，关于现象真正发生的确切比例的表述，会让人误入歧途。因此，人们提出了一个问题，即人文科学软件开发的重点是否应转移到人类本身，即描述欠规范是复杂规划和问题解决行为的人类特征，但与教师的认识论无关。而在科学领域，它可能更直白地凸显出来，在人文学科中则尤为明显，即较少混合。事实上，对人文学科软件开发的任何具体描述都会产生误导，因为对人文学科的关注融合了一般科学工作中固有的诠释学。","language":"en","urldate":"2019-10-10","publisher":"Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V.","author":[{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Peukert"],"firstnames":["Hagen"],"suffixes":[]}],"year":"2019","note":"🏷️ /unread","keywords":"/unread","bibtex":"@book{peukert2019,\n\ttitle = {Is it about {Human}(itie)s? {Experiences} from {Software} {Projects} across three {Faculties}},\n\tisbn = {978-3-88579-689-3},\n\tshorttitle = {与人有关吗？来自三个学院软件项目的经验},\n\turl = {http://dl.gi.de/handle/20.500.12116/25048},\n\tabstract = {Considering the experience with software development in research projects in three different faculties, it is argued here that the issue of underspecification and finding out what is really wanted is not restricted to the Humanities. Rather, it occurs in Science and Social Science seemingly at the same ratio. However, in absence of representational data, statements at which exact shares the phenomenon really occurs, lead up the garden path. Hence, the question is raised whether the focus of software development in the Humanities should shift to human per se describing the fact that underspecification is a human trait of complex planning and problem solving behavior, but independent from the faculty’s epistemology. And possibly it comes to the fore in science more bluntly and it is particularly apparent in the Humanities, i.e. less blended. In fact, any specific account of software development in the Humanities is misleading because the focus on the Humanities blends the hermeneutics inherent in scientific work in general.\n\n【摘要翻译】考虑到在三个不同院系的研究项目中开发软件的经验，本文认为，\"不够明确 \"和 \"找出真正想要的东西 \"的问题并不局限于人文学科。相反，科学和社会科学似乎也存在同样的问题。然而，在缺乏代表性数据的情况下，关于现象真正发生的确切比例的表述，会让人误入歧途。因此，人们提出了一个问题，即人文科学软件开发的重点是否应转移到人类本身，即描述欠规范是复杂规划和问题解决行为的人类特征，但与教师的认识论无关。而在科学领域，它可能更直白地凸显出来，在人文学科中则尤为明显，即较少混合。事实上，对人文学科软件开发的任何具体描述都会产生误导，因为对人文学科的关注融合了一般科学工作中固有的诠释学。},\n\tlanguage = {en},\n\turldate = {2019-10-10},\n\tpublisher = {Gesellschaft für Informatik e.V.},\n\tauthor = {Peukert, Hagen},\n\tyear = {2019},\n\tnote = {🏷️ /unread},\n\tkeywords = {/unread},\n}\n","author_short":["Peukert, H."],"key":"peukert2019","id":"peukert2019","bibbaseid":"peukert-isitabouthumanitiesexperiencesfromsoftwareprojectsacrossthreefaculties-2019","role":"author","urls":{"Paper":"http://dl.gi.de/handle/20.500.12116/25048"},"keyword":["/unread"],"metadata":{"authorlinks":{}}},"bibtype":"book","biburl":"https://api.zotero.org/groups/2386895/collections/FDNHDHM4/items?format=bibtex&limit=100","dataSources":["argdh7LKGZkauRL3j"],"keywords":["/unread"],"search_terms":["human","itie","experiences","software","projects","three","faculties","peukert"],"title":"Is it about Human(itie)s? Experiences from Software Projects across three Faculties","year":2019}