Rotation-invariant texture classification using feature distributions. Pietikäinen M, O., T., &., X., Z. 2000. abstract bibtex A distribution-based classification approach and a set of recently developed texture measures are applied to rotation-invariant texture classification. The performance is compared to that obtained with the well-known circular-symmetric autoregressive random field (CSAR) model approach. A difficult classification problem of 15 different Brodatz textures and seven rotation angles is used in e x periments. The results show much better performance for our approach than for the CSAR features. A detailed analysis of the confusion matrices and the rotation angles of misclassified samples produces several interesting observations about the classificat ion problem and the features used in this study.
@article{
title = {Rotation-invariant texture classification using feature distributions.},
type = {article},
year = {2000},
id = {9b234497-a46c-3139-8b43-91326fe834ca},
created = {2019-11-19T13:01:09.703Z},
file_attached = {false},
profile_id = {bddcf02d-403b-3b06-9def-6d15cc293e20},
group_id = {17585b85-df99-3a34-98c2-c73e593397d7},
last_modified = {2019-11-19T13:45:23.090Z},
read = {false},
starred = {false},
authored = {false},
confirmed = {true},
hidden = {false},
citation_key = {mvg:7},
source_type = {article},
notes = {Pattern Recognition 33:43 - 52.},
private_publication = {false},
abstract = {A distribution-based classification approach and a set of recently developed texture measures are applied to rotation-invariant texture classification. The performance is compared to that obtained with the well-known circular-symmetric autoregressive random field (CSAR) model approach. A difficult classification problem of 15 different Brodatz textures and seven rotation angles is used in e x periments. The results show much better performance for our approach than for the CSAR features. A detailed analysis of the confusion matrices and the rotation angles of misclassified samples produces several interesting observations about the classificat ion problem and the features used in this study.},
bibtype = {article},
author = {Pietikäinen M, Ojala T & Xu Z}
}
Downloads: 0
{"_id":"B9joMTYcYrLdkvTS7","bibbaseid":"pietikinenm-rotationinvarianttextureclassificationusingfeaturedistributions-2000","authorIDs":[],"author_short":["Pietikäinen M, O., T., &., X., Z."],"bibdata":{"title":"Rotation-invariant texture classification using feature distributions.","type":"article","year":"2000","id":"9b234497-a46c-3139-8b43-91326fe834ca","created":"2019-11-19T13:01:09.703Z","file_attached":false,"profile_id":"bddcf02d-403b-3b06-9def-6d15cc293e20","group_id":"17585b85-df99-3a34-98c2-c73e593397d7","last_modified":"2019-11-19T13:45:23.090Z","read":false,"starred":false,"authored":false,"confirmed":"true","hidden":false,"citation_key":"mvg:7","source_type":"article","notes":"Pattern Recognition 33:43 - 52.","private_publication":false,"abstract":"A distribution-based classification approach and a set of recently developed texture measures are applied to rotation-invariant texture classification. The performance is compared to that obtained with the well-known circular-symmetric autoregressive random field (CSAR) model approach. A difficult classification problem of 15 different Brodatz textures and seven rotation angles is used in e x periments. The results show much better performance for our approach than for the CSAR features. A detailed analysis of the confusion matrices and the rotation angles of misclassified samples produces several interesting observations about the classificat ion problem and the features used in this study.","bibtype":"article","author":"Pietikäinen M, Ojala T & Xu Z","bibtex":"@article{\n title = {Rotation-invariant texture classification using feature distributions.},\n type = {article},\n year = {2000},\n id = {9b234497-a46c-3139-8b43-91326fe834ca},\n created = {2019-11-19T13:01:09.703Z},\n file_attached = {false},\n profile_id = {bddcf02d-403b-3b06-9def-6d15cc293e20},\n group_id = {17585b85-df99-3a34-98c2-c73e593397d7},\n last_modified = {2019-11-19T13:45:23.090Z},\n read = {false},\n starred = {false},\n authored = {false},\n confirmed = {true},\n hidden = {false},\n citation_key = {mvg:7},\n source_type = {article},\n notes = {Pattern Recognition 33:43 - 52.},\n private_publication = {false},\n abstract = {A distribution-based classification approach and a set of recently developed texture measures are applied to rotation-invariant texture classification. The performance is compared to that obtained with the well-known circular-symmetric autoregressive random field (CSAR) model approach. A difficult classification problem of 15 different Brodatz textures and seven rotation angles is used in e x periments. The results show much better performance for our approach than for the CSAR features. A detailed analysis of the confusion matrices and the rotation angles of misclassified samples produces several interesting observations about the classificat ion problem and the features used in this study.},\n bibtype = {article},\n author = {Pietikäinen M, Ojala T & Xu Z}\n}","author_short":["Pietikäinen M, O., T., &., X., Z."],"bibbaseid":"pietikinenm-rotationinvarianttextureclassificationusingfeaturedistributions-2000","role":"author","urls":{},"downloads":0},"bibtype":"article","creationDate":"2019-11-19T13:17:06.390Z","downloads":0,"keywords":[],"search_terms":["rotation","invariant","texture","classification","using","feature","distributions","pietikäinen m"],"title":"Rotation-invariant texture classification using feature distributions.","year":2000}