@article{pigden_conspiracy_2007,
	title = {Conspiracy {Theories} and the {Conventional} {Wisdom}},
	volume = {4},
	issn = {1750-0117, 1742-3600},
	url = {https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/episteme/article/conspiracy-theories-and-the-conventional-wisdom/F493AE4E5065A43AB0420622A9652CCD},
	doi = {10.3366/epi.2007.4.2.219},
	abstract = {Conspiracy theories should be neither believed nor investigated - that is the conventional wisdom. I argue that it is sometimes permissible both to investigate and to believe. Hence this is a dispute in the ethics of belief. I defend epistemic “oughts” that apply in the first instance to belief-forming strategies that are partly under our control. But the belief-forming strategy of not believing conspiracy theories would be a political disaster and the epistemic equivalent of self-mutilation. I discuss several variations of this strategy, interpreting “conspiracy theory” in different ways but conclude that on all these readings, the conventional wisdom is deeply unwise.},
	language = {en},
	number = {2},
	urldate = {2020-11-18},
	journal = {Episteme},
	author = {Pigden, Charles},
	month = jun,
	year = {2007},
	note = {Publisher: Cambridge University Press},
	pages = {219--232},
}

{"_id":"XMYLvmaB4s8fFxjhD","bibbaseid":"pigden-conspiracytheoriesandtheconventionalwisdom-2007","author_short":["Pigden, C."],"bibdata":{"bibtype":"article","type":"article","title":"Conspiracy Theories and the Conventional Wisdom","volume":"4","issn":"1750-0117, 1742-3600","url":"https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/episteme/article/conspiracy-theories-and-the-conventional-wisdom/F493AE4E5065A43AB0420622A9652CCD","doi":"10.3366/epi.2007.4.2.219","abstract":"Conspiracy theories should be neither believed nor investigated - that is the conventional wisdom. I argue that it is sometimes permissible both to investigate and to believe. Hence this is a dispute in the ethics of belief. I defend epistemic “oughts” that apply in the first instance to belief-forming strategies that are partly under our control. But the belief-forming strategy of not believing conspiracy theories would be a political disaster and the epistemic equivalent of self-mutilation. I discuss several variations of this strategy, interpreting “conspiracy theory” in different ways but conclude that on all these readings, the conventional wisdom is deeply unwise.","language":"en","number":"2","urldate":"2020-11-18","journal":"Episteme","author":[{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Pigden"],"firstnames":["Charles"],"suffixes":[]}],"month":"June","year":"2007","note":"Publisher: Cambridge University Press","pages":"219–232","bibtex":"@article{pigden_conspiracy_2007,\n\ttitle = {Conspiracy {Theories} and the {Conventional} {Wisdom}},\n\tvolume = {4},\n\tissn = {1750-0117, 1742-3600},\n\turl = {https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/episteme/article/conspiracy-theories-and-the-conventional-wisdom/F493AE4E5065A43AB0420622A9652CCD},\n\tdoi = {10.3366/epi.2007.4.2.219},\n\tabstract = {Conspiracy theories should be neither believed nor investigated - that is the conventional wisdom. I argue that it is sometimes permissible both to investigate and to believe. Hence this is a dispute in the ethics of belief. I defend epistemic “oughts” that apply in the first instance to belief-forming strategies that are partly under our control. But the belief-forming strategy of not believing conspiracy theories would be a political disaster and the epistemic equivalent of self-mutilation. I discuss several variations of this strategy, interpreting “conspiracy theory” in different ways but conclude that on all these readings, the conventional wisdom is deeply unwise.},\n\tlanguage = {en},\n\tnumber = {2},\n\turldate = {2020-11-18},\n\tjournal = {Episteme},\n\tauthor = {Pigden, Charles},\n\tmonth = jun,\n\tyear = {2007},\n\tnote = {Publisher: Cambridge University Press},\n\tpages = {219--232},\n}\n\n\n\n","author_short":["Pigden, C."],"key":"pigden_conspiracy_2007","id":"pigden_conspiracy_2007","bibbaseid":"pigden-conspiracytheoriesandtheconventionalwisdom-2007","role":"author","urls":{"Paper":"https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/episteme/article/conspiracy-theories-and-the-conventional-wisdom/F493AE4E5065A43AB0420622A9652CCD"},"metadata":{"authorlinks":{}}},"bibtype":"article","biburl":"http://bibbase.org/zotero-group/science_et_ignorance/1340424","dataSources":["zX4acseCDM6D58AW7"],"keywords":[],"search_terms":["conspiracy","theories","conventional","wisdom","pigden"],"title":"Conspiracy Theories and the Conventional Wisdom","year":2007}