Inherited vs Self-Made Wealth: Theory and Evidence from a Rentier Society (Paris 1872-1937). Piketty, T., Postel-Vinay, G., & Rosenthal, J. 2011. Unpublished manuscript
Inherited vs Self-Made Wealth: Theory and Evidence from a Rentier Society (Paris 1872-1937) [link]Link  abstract   bibtex   
This paper divides the population into two groups: the ``inheritors'' or ``rentiers'' (whose wealth is smaller than the capitalized value of their inherited wealth, i.e. who consumed more than their labor income during their lifetime); and the ``savers'' or ``self-made men'' (whose wealth is larger than the capitalized value of their inherited wealth, i.e. who consumed less than their labor income). Applying this simple theoretical model to a unique micro data set on inheritance and matrimonial property regimes, we find that Paris in 1872-1937 looks like a prototype ``rentier society''. Rentiers made about 10% of the population of Parisians but owned 70% of aggregate wealth. Rentier societies thrive when the rate of return on private wealth r is permanently and substantially larger than the growth rate g (say, r=4%-5% vs g=1%-2%). This was the case in the 19th century and early 20th century and is likely to happen again in the 21st century. In such cases top successors, by consuming part of the return to their inherited wealth, can sustain living standards far beyond what labor income alone would permit.
@unpublished{Pikettyetal2011,
  title = {Inherited vs Self-Made Wealth: Theory and Evidence from a Rentier Society (Paris 1872-1937)},
  author = {Piketty, Thomas and {Postel-Vinay}, Gilles and Rosenthal, Jean-Laurent},
  year = {2011},
  url = {https://hal-pse.archives-ouvertes.fr/halshs-00601075/},
  abstract = {This paper divides the population into two groups: the ``inheritors'' or ``rentiers'' (whose wealth is smaller than the capitalized value of their inherited wealth, i.e. who consumed more than their labor income during their lifetime); and the ``savers'' or ``self-made men'' (whose wealth is larger than the capitalized value of their inherited wealth, i.e. who consumed less than their labor income). Applying this simple theoretical model to a unique micro data set on inheritance and matrimonial property regimes, we find that Paris in 1872-1937 looks like a prototype ``rentier society''. Rentiers made about 10\% of the population of Parisians but owned 70\% of aggregate wealth. Rentier societies thrive when the rate of return on private wealth r is permanently and substantially larger than the growth rate g (say, r=4\%-5\% vs g=1\%-2\%). This was the case in the 19th century and early 20th century and is likely to happen again in the 21st century. In such cases top successors, by consuming part of the return to their inherited wealth, can sustain living standards far beyond what labor income alone would permit.},
  keywords = {Determinants of Wealth and Wealth Inequality,Intergenerational Wealth},
  note = {Unpublished manuscript}
}
Downloads: 0
About
Documentation
Keywords
Search
Users
Terms and Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Sitemap
© BibBase.org 2021