@article{ ISI:000257181600029,
Author = {Pilling, Graham M. and Kell, Laurence T. and Hutton, Trevor and Bromley,
   Peter J. and Tidd, Alex N. and Bolle, Loes J.},
Title = {{Can economic and biological management objectives be achieved by the use
   of MSY-based reference points? A North Sea plaice (Pleuronectes
   platessa) and sole (Solea solea) case study}},
Journal = {{ICES JOURNAL OF MARINE SCIENCE}},
Year = {{2008}},
Volume = {{65}},
Number = {{6}},
Pages = {{1069-1080}},
Month = {{SEP}},
Abstract = {{We examined the biological and economic impact of changing from
   management based on single-species limit reference points to one based
   on alternative targets, using the multispecies multifleet North Sea
   flatfish fishery. The robustness of reference points was tested against
   identified changes in plaice and sole biology. Current ICES
   single-species limit and precautionary biomass and fishing mortality
   reference points were seldom consistent with each other. Although they
   were generally robust to biological uncertainty, fishing at F(pa) for
   sole could lead to stock collapse under one biological scenario.
   Adoption of alternative targets would reduce reliance on current
   reference points as stocks moved to a more sustainable state. Maximum
   sustainable yield (MSY), maximum economic yield (MEY), and maximum
   employment conditions implied different effort levels in the two fleets
   modelled, and different profits. F(target) could be achieved with equal
   effort reductions in both fleets. Changes in stock biology affected the
   fishing effort required to maximize employment within the fishery,
   whereas MSY, F(max), and MEY targets were robust to this uncertainty.
   Resulting profits and yields did vary widely, however. The selection of
   target reference points therefore requires stakeholders to define
   fishery objectives explicitly, against which targets can be evaluated
   for the resulting trade-offs between risk to stocks, yield, employment,
   and other social objectives.}},
Publisher = {{OXFORD UNIV PRESS}},
Address = {{GREAT CLARENDON ST, OXFORD OX2 6DP, ENGLAND}},
Type = {{Article}},
Language = {{English}},
Affiliation = {{Pilling, GM (Reprint Author), Cefas, Pakefield Rd, Lowestoft NR33 0HT, Suffolk, England.
   Pilling, Graham M.; Kell, Laurence T.; Hutton, Trevor; Bromley, Peter J.; Tidd, Alex N., Cefas, Lowestoft NR33 0HT, Suffolk, England.
   Bolle, Loes J., Wageningen IMARES, NL-1970 AB Ijmuiden, Netherlands.}},
DOI = {{10.1093/icesjms/fsn063}},
ISSN = {{1054-3139}},
Keywords = {{flatfish; limit and target reference points; maximum sustainable yield;
   North Sea}},
Keywords-Plus = {{FISHERIES MANAGEMENT; ADVICE; MATURATION; GROWTH; STOCKS; YIELD; COD;
   SUSTAINABILITY; RECRUITMENT; SIMULATION}},
Research-Areas = {{Fisheries; Marine \& Freshwater Biology; Oceanography}},
Web-of-Science-Categories  = {{Fisheries; Marine \& Freshwater Biology; Oceanography}},
Author-Email = {{graham.pilling@cefas.co.uk}},
ResearcherID-Numbers = {{Hutton, Trevor/E-3066-2017}},
ORCID-Numbers = {{Hutton, Trevor/0000-0002-8747-6196}},
Number-of-Cited-References = {{40}},
Times-Cited = {{12}},
Usage-Count-Last-180-days = {{1}},
Usage-Count-Since-2013 = {{14}},
Journal-ISO = {{ICES J. Mar. Sci.}},
Doc-Delivery-Number = {{319RN}},
Unique-ID = {{ISI:000257181600029}},
OA = {{No}},
DA = {{2017-08-17}},
}

{"_id":"65XgcTJmCzzmj6R99","bibbaseid":"pilling-kell-hutton-bromley-tidd-bolle-caneconomicandbiologicalmanagementobjectivesbeachievedbytheuseofmsybasedreferencepointsanorthseaplaicepleuronectesplatessaandsolesoleasoleacasestudy-2008","downloads":0,"creationDate":"2017-08-17T14:08:07.674Z","title":"Can economic and biological management objectives be achieved by the use of MSY-based reference points? A North Sea plaice (Pleuronectes platessa) and sole (Solea solea) case study","author_short":["Pilling, G. M.","Kell, L. T.","Hutton, T.","Bromley, P. J.","Tidd, A. N.","Bolle, L. J."],"year":2008,"bibtype":"article","biburl":"http://flr-project.org/flr.bib","bibdata":{"bibtype":"article","type":"Article","author":[{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Pilling"],"firstnames":["Graham","M."],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Kell"],"firstnames":["Laurence","T."],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Hutton"],"firstnames":["Trevor"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Bromley"],"firstnames":["Peter","J."],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Tidd"],"firstnames":["Alex","N."],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Bolle"],"firstnames":["Loes","J."],"suffixes":[]}],"title":"Can economic and biological management objectives be achieved by the use of MSY-based reference points? A North Sea plaice (Pleuronectes platessa) and sole (Solea solea) case study","journal":"ICES JOURNAL OF MARINE SCIENCE","year":"2008","volume":"65","number":"6","pages":"1069-1080","month":"SEP","abstract":"We examined the biological and economic impact of changing from management based on single-species limit reference points to one based on alternative targets, using the multispecies multifleet North Sea flatfish fishery. The robustness of reference points was tested against identified changes in plaice and sole biology. Current ICES single-species limit and precautionary biomass and fishing mortality reference points were seldom consistent with each other. Although they were generally robust to biological uncertainty, fishing at F(pa) for sole could lead to stock collapse under one biological scenario. Adoption of alternative targets would reduce reliance on current reference points as stocks moved to a more sustainable state. Maximum sustainable yield (MSY), maximum economic yield (MEY), and maximum employment conditions implied different effort levels in the two fleets modelled, and different profits. F(target) could be achieved with equal effort reductions in both fleets. Changes in stock biology affected the fishing effort required to maximize employment within the fishery, whereas MSY, F(max), and MEY targets were robust to this uncertainty. Resulting profits and yields did vary widely, however. The selection of target reference points therefore requires stakeholders to define fishery objectives explicitly, against which targets can be evaluated for the resulting trade-offs between risk to stocks, yield, employment, and other social objectives.","publisher":"OXFORD UNIV PRESS","address":"GREAT CLARENDON ST, OXFORD OX2 6DP, ENGLAND","language":"English","affiliation":"Pilling, GM (Reprint Author), Cefas, Pakefield Rd, Lowestoft NR33 0HT, Suffolk, England. Pilling, Graham M.; Kell, Laurence T.; Hutton, Trevor; Bromley, Peter J.; Tidd, Alex N., Cefas, Lowestoft NR33 0HT, Suffolk, England. Bolle, Loes J., Wageningen IMARES, NL-1970 AB Ijmuiden, Netherlands.","doi":"10.1093/icesjms/fsn063","issn":"1054-3139","keywords":"flatfish; limit and target reference points; maximum sustainable yield; North Sea","keywords-plus":"FISHERIES MANAGEMENT; ADVICE; MATURATION; GROWTH; STOCKS; YIELD; COD; SUSTAINABILITY; RECRUITMENT; SIMULATION","research-areas":"Fisheries; Marine & Freshwater Biology; Oceanography","web-of-science-categories":"Fisheries; Marine & Freshwater Biology; Oceanography","author-email":"graham.pilling@cefas.co.uk","researcherid-numbers":"Hutton, Trevor/E-3066-2017","orcid-numbers":"Hutton, Trevor/0000-0002-8747-6196","number-of-cited-references":"40","times-cited":"12","usage-count-last-180-days":"1","usage-count-since-2013":"14","journal-iso":"ICES J. Mar. Sci.","doc-delivery-number":"319RN","unique-id":"ISI:000257181600029","oa":"No","da":"2017-08-17","bibtex":"@article{ ISI:000257181600029,\nAuthor = {Pilling, Graham M. and Kell, Laurence T. and Hutton, Trevor and Bromley,\n Peter J. and Tidd, Alex N. and Bolle, Loes J.},\nTitle = {{Can economic and biological management objectives be achieved by the use\n of MSY-based reference points? A North Sea plaice (Pleuronectes\n platessa) and sole (Solea solea) case study}},\nJournal = {{ICES JOURNAL OF MARINE SCIENCE}},\nYear = {{2008}},\nVolume = {{65}},\nNumber = {{6}},\nPages = {{1069-1080}},\nMonth = {{SEP}},\nAbstract = {{We examined the biological and economic impact of changing from\n management based on single-species limit reference points to one based\n on alternative targets, using the multispecies multifleet North Sea\n flatfish fishery. The robustness of reference points was tested against\n identified changes in plaice and sole biology. Current ICES\n single-species limit and precautionary biomass and fishing mortality\n reference points were seldom consistent with each other. Although they\n were generally robust to biological uncertainty, fishing at F(pa) for\n sole could lead to stock collapse under one biological scenario.\n Adoption of alternative targets would reduce reliance on current\n reference points as stocks moved to a more sustainable state. Maximum\n sustainable yield (MSY), maximum economic yield (MEY), and maximum\n employment conditions implied different effort levels in the two fleets\n modelled, and different profits. F(target) could be achieved with equal\n effort reductions in both fleets. Changes in stock biology affected the\n fishing effort required to maximize employment within the fishery,\n whereas MSY, F(max), and MEY targets were robust to this uncertainty.\n Resulting profits and yields did vary widely, however. The selection of\n target reference points therefore requires stakeholders to define\n fishery objectives explicitly, against which targets can be evaluated\n for the resulting trade-offs between risk to stocks, yield, employment,\n and other social objectives.}},\nPublisher = {{OXFORD UNIV PRESS}},\nAddress = {{GREAT CLARENDON ST, OXFORD OX2 6DP, ENGLAND}},\nType = {{Article}},\nLanguage = {{English}},\nAffiliation = {{Pilling, GM (Reprint Author), Cefas, Pakefield Rd, Lowestoft NR33 0HT, Suffolk, England.\n Pilling, Graham M.; Kell, Laurence T.; Hutton, Trevor; Bromley, Peter J.; Tidd, Alex N., Cefas, Lowestoft NR33 0HT, Suffolk, England.\n Bolle, Loes J., Wageningen IMARES, NL-1970 AB Ijmuiden, Netherlands.}},\nDOI = {{10.1093/icesjms/fsn063}},\nISSN = {{1054-3139}},\nKeywords = {{flatfish; limit and target reference points; maximum sustainable yield;\n North Sea}},\nKeywords-Plus = {{FISHERIES MANAGEMENT; ADVICE; MATURATION; GROWTH; STOCKS; YIELD; COD;\n SUSTAINABILITY; RECRUITMENT; SIMULATION}},\nResearch-Areas = {{Fisheries; Marine \\& Freshwater Biology; Oceanography}},\nWeb-of-Science-Categories = {{Fisheries; Marine \\& Freshwater Biology; Oceanography}},\nAuthor-Email = {{graham.pilling@cefas.co.uk}},\nResearcherID-Numbers = {{Hutton, Trevor/E-3066-2017}},\nORCID-Numbers = {{Hutton, Trevor/0000-0002-8747-6196}},\nNumber-of-Cited-References = {{40}},\nTimes-Cited = {{12}},\nUsage-Count-Last-180-days = {{1}},\nUsage-Count-Since-2013 = {{14}},\nJournal-ISO = {{ICES J. Mar. Sci.}},\nDoc-Delivery-Number = {{319RN}},\nUnique-ID = {{ISI:000257181600029}},\nOA = {{No}},\nDA = {{2017-08-17}},\n}\n\n","author_short":["Pilling, G. M.","Kell, L. T.","Hutton, T.","Bromley, P. J.","Tidd, A. N.","Bolle, L. J."],"key":"ISI:000257181600029","id":"ISI:000257181600029","bibbaseid":"pilling-kell-hutton-bromley-tidd-bolle-caneconomicandbiologicalmanagementobjectivesbeachievedbytheuseofmsybasedreferencepointsanorthseaplaicepleuronectesplatessaandsolesoleasoleacasestudy-2008","role":"author","urls":{},"keyword":["flatfish; limit and target reference points; maximum sustainable yield; North Sea"],"metadata":{"authorlinks":{}},"downloads":0},"search_terms":["economic","biological","management","objectives","achieved","use","msy","based","reference","points","north","sea","plaice","pleuronectes","platessa","sole","solea","solea","case","study","pilling","kell","hutton","bromley","tidd","bolle"],"keywords":["flatfish; limit and target reference points; maximum sustainable yield; north sea"],"authorIDs":[],"dataSources":["WA8XYs6LQoFRqHaQt","NDGPxX9hJs9BdrF52"]}