@Article{Pineno2005,
  author   = {Oskar Pine{\~n}o and Kouji Urushihara and Ralph R Miller},
  journal  = {J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process},
  title    = {Spontaneous recovery from forward and backward blocking.},
  year     = {2005},
  number   = {2},
  pages    = {172-83},
  volume   = {31},
  abstract = {This article demonstrates and analyzes spontaneous recovery of stimulus
	control following both forward and backward blocking in a conditioned
	suppression preparation with rats. Experiment 1 found, in first-order
	conditioning, robust forward blocking and an attenuation of it following
	a retention interval. Experiment 2 showed, in sensory preconditioning,
	recovery of responding following both forward and backward blocking.
	Also, the results of this experiment indicated that response recovery
	to the blocked stimulus cannot be explained by an impaired status
	of the blocking stimulus after a retention interval. Experiment 3,
	also in sensory preconditioning, suggested that spontaneous recovery
	following both forward and backward blocking in Experiment 2 was
	due to impaired associative activation of the blocking stimulus'
	representation during testing with the blocked stimulus. Although
	no contemporary model of associative learning can explain these results,
	a modification of R. R. Miller and L. D. Matzel's (1988) comparator
	hypothesis is proposed to do so. ((c) 2005 APA, all rights reserved).},
  doi      = {10.1037/0097-7403.31.2.172},
  keywords = {15839774},
}

{"_id":"nP6u8rv9JW6ZDJd8D","bibbaseid":"pineo-urushihara-miller-spontaneousrecoveryfromforwardandbackwardblocking-2005","author_short":["Pineño, O.","Urushihara, K.","Miller, R. R"],"bibdata":{"bibtype":"article","type":"article","author":[{"firstnames":["Oskar"],"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Pineño"],"suffixes":[]},{"firstnames":["Kouji"],"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Urushihara"],"suffixes":[]},{"firstnames":["Ralph","R"],"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Miller"],"suffixes":[]}],"journal":"J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process","title":"Spontaneous recovery from forward and backward blocking.","year":"2005","number":"2","pages":"172-83","volume":"31","abstract":"This article demonstrates and analyzes spontaneous recovery of stimulus control following both forward and backward blocking in a conditioned suppression preparation with rats. Experiment 1 found, in first-order conditioning, robust forward blocking and an attenuation of it following a retention interval. Experiment 2 showed, in sensory preconditioning, recovery of responding following both forward and backward blocking. Also, the results of this experiment indicated that response recovery to the blocked stimulus cannot be explained by an impaired status of the blocking stimulus after a retention interval. Experiment 3, also in sensory preconditioning, suggested that spontaneous recovery following both forward and backward blocking in Experiment 2 was due to impaired associative activation of the blocking stimulus' representation during testing with the blocked stimulus. Although no contemporary model of associative learning can explain these results, a modification of R. R. Miller and L. D. Matzel's (1988) comparator hypothesis is proposed to do so. ((c) 2005 APA, all rights reserved).","doi":"10.1037/0097-7403.31.2.172","keywords":"15839774","bibtex":"@Article{Pineno2005,\n author = {Oskar Pine{\\~n}o and Kouji Urushihara and Ralph R Miller},\n journal = {J Exp Psychol Anim Behav Process},\n title = {Spontaneous recovery from forward and backward blocking.},\n year = {2005},\n number = {2},\n pages = {172-83},\n volume = {31},\n abstract = {This article demonstrates and analyzes spontaneous recovery of stimulus\n\tcontrol following both forward and backward blocking in a conditioned\n\tsuppression preparation with rats. Experiment 1 found, in first-order\n\tconditioning, robust forward blocking and an attenuation of it following\n\ta retention interval. Experiment 2 showed, in sensory preconditioning,\n\trecovery of responding following both forward and backward blocking.\n\tAlso, the results of this experiment indicated that response recovery\n\tto the blocked stimulus cannot be explained by an impaired status\n\tof the blocking stimulus after a retention interval. Experiment 3,\n\talso in sensory preconditioning, suggested that spontaneous recovery\n\tfollowing both forward and backward blocking in Experiment 2 was\n\tdue to impaired associative activation of the blocking stimulus'\n\trepresentation during testing with the blocked stimulus. Although\n\tno contemporary model of associative learning can explain these results,\n\ta modification of R. R. Miller and L. D. Matzel's (1988) comparator\n\thypothesis is proposed to do so. ((c) 2005 APA, all rights reserved).},\n doi = {10.1037/0097-7403.31.2.172},\n keywords = {15839774},\n}\n\n","author_short":["Pineño, O.","Urushihara, K.","Miller, R. R"],"key":"Pineno2005","id":"Pineno2005","bibbaseid":"pineo-urushihara-miller-spontaneousrecoveryfromforwardandbackwardblocking-2005","role":"author","urls":{},"keyword":["15839774"],"metadata":{"authorlinks":{}}},"bibtype":"article","biburl":"https://endress.org/publications/ansgar.bib","dataSources":["xPGxHAeh3vZpx4yyE","TXa55dQbNoWnaGmMq"],"keywords":["15839774"],"search_terms":["spontaneous","recovery","forward","backward","blocking","pineño","urushihara","miller"],"title":"Spontaneous recovery from forward and backward blocking.","year":2005}