The efficacy of training insertion skill on a physical model colonoscopy simulator. Plooy, A. M., Hill, A., Horswill, M. S., Cresp, A. S., Karamatic, R., Riek, S., Wallis, G. M., Burgess-Limerick, R., Hewett, D. G., & Watson, M. O. Endoscopy International Open, 4(12):E1252–E1260, December, 2016. 00007 ZSCC: 0000007 ![The efficacy of training insertion skill on a physical model colonoscopy simulator [link]](https://bibbase.org/img/filetypes/link.svg "link")
Paper doi abstract bibtex Background and study aims: Prior research supports the validity of performance measures derived from the use of a physical model colonoscopy simulator – the Kyoto Kagaku Colonoscope Training Model (Kyoto Kagaku Co. Ltd., Kyoto, Japan) – for assessing insertion skill. However, its use as a training tool has received little research attention. We assessed the efficacy of a brief structured program to develop basic colonoscope insertion skill through unsupervised practice on the model. , Participants and methods: This was a training study with pretesting and post-testing. Thirty-two colonoscopy novices completed an 11-hour training regime in which they practiced cases on the model in a colonoscopy simulation research laboratory. They also attempted a series of test cases before and after training. For each outcome measure (completion rates, time to cecum and peak force applied to the model), we compared trainees’ post-test performance with the untrained novices and experienced colonoscopists from a previously-reported validation study. , Results: Compared with untrained novices, trained novices had higher completion rates and shorter times to cecum overall (Ps \textless .001), but were out-performed by the experienced colono-scopists on these metrics (Ps \textless .001). Nevertheless, their performance was generally closer to that of the experienced group. Overall, trained novices did not differ from either experience-level comparison group in the peak forces they applied (P \textgreater .05). We also present the results broken down by case. , Conclusions: The program can be used to teach trainees basic insertion skill in a more or less self-directed way. Individuals who have completed the program (or similar training on the model) are better prepared to progress to supervised live cases.
@article{plooy_efficacy_2016,
title = {The efficacy of training insertion skill on a physical model colonoscopy simulator},
volume = {4},
issn = {2364-3722},
url = {https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5161130/},
doi = {10/gnbzhd},
abstract = {Background and study aims: Prior research supports the validity of
performance measures derived from the use of a physical model colonoscopy
simulator – the Kyoto Kagaku Colonoscope Training Model (Kyoto Kagaku Co.
Ltd., Kyoto, Japan) – for assessing insertion skill. However, its use as a
training tool has received little research attention. We assessed the efficacy
of a brief structured program to develop basic colonoscope insertion skill
through unsupervised practice on the model. ,
Participants and methods: This was a training study with pretesting and
post-testing. Thirty-two colonoscopy novices completed an 11-hour training
regime in which they practiced cases on the model in a colonoscopy simulation
research laboratory. They also attempted a series of test cases before and after
training. For each outcome measure (completion rates, time to cecum and peak
force applied to the model), we compared trainees’ post-test performance with
the untrained novices and experienced colonoscopists from a
previously-reported validation study. ,
Results: Compared with untrained novices, trained novices had higher
completion rates and shorter times to cecum overall (Ps {\textless} .001), but
were out-performed by the experienced colono-scopists on these metrics
(Ps {\textless} .001). Nevertheless, their performance was generally closer
to that of the experienced group. Overall, trained novices did not differ from
either experience-level comparison group in the peak forces they applied
(P {\textgreater} .05). We also present the results broken down by case. ,
Conclusions: The program can be used to teach trainees basic insertion
skill in a more or less self-directed way. Individuals who have completed the
program (or similar training on the model) are better prepared to progress to
supervised live cases.},
number = {12},
urldate = {2021-11-05},
journal = {Endoscopy International Open},
author = {Plooy, Annaliese M. and Hill, Andrew and Horswill, Mark S. and Cresp, Alanna St.G. and Karamatic, Rozemary and Riek, Stephan and Wallis, Guy M. and Burgess-Limerick, Robin and Hewett, David G. and Watson, Marcus O.},
month = dec,
year = {2016},
pmid = {27995185},
pmcid = {PMC5161130},
note = {00007
ZSCC: 0000007 },
keywords = {Unread},
pages = {E1252--E1260},
}
Downloads: 0
{"_id":"QakcnzcJLxKbS6FHB","bibbaseid":"plooy-hill-horswill-cresp-karamatic-riek-wallis-burgesslimerick-etal-theefficacyoftraininginsertionskillonaphysicalmodelcolonoscopysimulator-2016","author_short":["Plooy, A. M.","Hill, A.","Horswill, M. S.","Cresp, A. S.","Karamatic, R.","Riek, S.","Wallis, G. M.","Burgess-Limerick, R.","Hewett, D. G.","Watson, M. O."],"bibdata":{"bibtype":"article","type":"article","title":"The efficacy of training insertion skill on a physical model colonoscopy simulator","volume":"4","issn":"2364-3722","url":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5161130/","doi":"10/gnbzhd","abstract":"Background and study aims: Prior research supports the validity of performance measures derived from the use of a physical model colonoscopy simulator – the Kyoto Kagaku Colonoscope Training Model (Kyoto Kagaku Co. Ltd., Kyoto, Japan) – for assessing insertion skill. However, its use as a training tool has received little research attention. We assessed the efficacy of a brief structured program to develop basic colonoscope insertion skill through unsupervised practice on the model. , Participants and methods: This was a training study with pretesting and post-testing. Thirty-two colonoscopy novices completed an 11-hour training regime in which they practiced cases on the model in a colonoscopy simulation research laboratory. They also attempted a series of test cases before and after training. For each outcome measure (completion rates, time to cecum and peak force applied to the model), we compared trainees’ post-test performance with the untrained novices and experienced colonoscopists from a previously-reported validation study. , Results: Compared with untrained novices, trained novices had higher completion rates and shorter times to cecum overall (Ps \\textless .001), but were out-performed by the experienced colono-scopists on these metrics (Ps \\textless .001). Nevertheless, their performance was generally closer to that of the experienced group. Overall, trained novices did not differ from either experience-level comparison group in the peak forces they applied (P \\textgreater .05). We also present the results broken down by case. , Conclusions: The program can be used to teach trainees basic insertion skill in a more or less self-directed way. Individuals who have completed the program (or similar training on the model) are better prepared to progress to supervised live cases.","number":"12","urldate":"2021-11-05","journal":"Endoscopy International Open","author":[{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Plooy"],"firstnames":["Annaliese","M."],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Hill"],"firstnames":["Andrew"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Horswill"],"firstnames":["Mark","S."],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Cresp"],"firstnames":["Alanna","St.G."],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Karamatic"],"firstnames":["Rozemary"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Riek"],"firstnames":["Stephan"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Wallis"],"firstnames":["Guy","M."],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Burgess-Limerick"],"firstnames":["Robin"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Hewett"],"firstnames":["David","G."],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Watson"],"firstnames":["Marcus","O."],"suffixes":[]}],"month":"December","year":"2016","pmid":"27995185","pmcid":"PMC5161130","note":"00007 ZSCC: 0000007 ","keywords":"Unread","pages":"E1252–E1260","bibtex":"@article{plooy_efficacy_2016,\n\ttitle = {The efficacy of training insertion skill on a physical model colonoscopy simulator},\n\tvolume = {4},\n\tissn = {2364-3722},\n\turl = {https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5161130/},\n\tdoi = {10/gnbzhd},\n\tabstract = {Background and study aims: Prior research supports the validity of\nperformance measures derived from the use of a physical model colonoscopy\nsimulator – the Kyoto Kagaku Colonoscope Training Model (Kyoto Kagaku Co.\nLtd., Kyoto, Japan) – for assessing insertion skill. However, its use as a\ntraining tool has received little research attention. We assessed the efficacy\nof a brief structured program to develop basic colonoscope insertion skill\nthrough unsupervised practice on the model. , \nParticipants and methods: This was a training study with pretesting and\npost-testing. Thirty-two colonoscopy novices completed an 11-hour training\nregime in which they practiced cases on the model in a colonoscopy simulation\nresearch laboratory. They also attempted a series of test cases before and after\ntraining. For each outcome measure (completion rates, time to cecum and peak\nforce applied to the model), we compared trainees’ post-test performance with\nthe untrained novices and experienced colonoscopists from a\npreviously-reported validation study. , \nResults: Compared with untrained novices, trained novices had higher\ncompletion rates and shorter times to cecum overall (Ps {\\textless} .001), but\nwere out-performed by the experienced colono-scopists on these metrics\n(Ps {\\textless} .001). Nevertheless, their performance was generally closer\nto that of the experienced group. Overall, trained novices did not differ from\neither experience-level comparison group in the peak forces they applied\n(P {\\textgreater} .05). We also present the results broken down by case. , \nConclusions: The program can be used to teach trainees basic insertion\nskill in a more or less self-directed way. Individuals who have completed the\nprogram (or similar training on the model) are better prepared to progress to\nsupervised live cases.},\n\tnumber = {12},\n\turldate = {2021-11-05},\n\tjournal = {Endoscopy International Open},\n\tauthor = {Plooy, Annaliese M. and Hill, Andrew and Horswill, Mark S. and Cresp, Alanna St.G. and Karamatic, Rozemary and Riek, Stephan and Wallis, Guy M. and Burgess-Limerick, Robin and Hewett, David G. and Watson, Marcus O.},\n\tmonth = dec,\n\tyear = {2016},\n\tpmid = {27995185},\n\tpmcid = {PMC5161130},\n\tnote = {00007 \nZSCC: 0000007 },\n\tkeywords = {Unread},\n\tpages = {E1252--E1260},\n}\n\n\n\n","author_short":["Plooy, A. M.","Hill, A.","Horswill, M. S.","Cresp, A. S.","Karamatic, R.","Riek, S.","Wallis, G. M.","Burgess-Limerick, R.","Hewett, D. G.","Watson, M. O."],"key":"plooy_efficacy_2016","id":"plooy_efficacy_2016","bibbaseid":"plooy-hill-horswill-cresp-karamatic-riek-wallis-burgesslimerick-etal-theefficacyoftraininginsertionskillonaphysicalmodelcolonoscopysimulator-2016","role":"author","urls":{"Paper":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5161130/"},"keyword":["Unread"],"metadata":{"authorlinks":{}},"html":""},"bibtype":"article","biburl":"https://bibbase.org/zotero/nikitaj.greenidge","dataSources":["uXDRqZDxuAtbLLS2T"],"keywords":["unread"],"search_terms":["efficacy","training","insertion","skill","physical","model","colonoscopy","simulator","plooy","hill","horswill","cresp","karamatic","riek","wallis","burgess-limerick","hewett","watson"],"title":"The efficacy of training insertion skill on a physical model colonoscopy simulator","year":2016}