Rethinking Epistemic Appropriation. Podosky, P. C. Episteme, 20(1):142 – 162, 2023. Publisher: Cambridge University Press Type: Article![Rethinking Epistemic Appropriation [link]](https://bibbase.org/img/filetypes/link.svg "link")
Paper doi abstract bibtex Emmalon Davis has offered an insightful analysis of an under-theorized form of epistemic oppression called epistemic appropriation. This occurs when an epistemic resource developed within marginalized situatedness gains inter-communal uptake, but the author of the epistemic resource is unacknowledged. In this paper, I argue that Davis’s definition of epistemic appropriation is not exhaustive. In particular, she misses out on explaining cases of epistemic appropriation in which an intra-communal epistemic resource is obscured through inter-communal uptake. Being attentive to this form of epistemic appropriation allows us to identify unique forms of epistemic oppression that emerge as a result of socially maintained active ignorance. © The Author(s), 2021.
@article{podosky_rethinking_2023,
title = {Rethinking {Epistemic} {Appropriation}},
volume = {20},
issn = {17423600},
url = {https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85103707745&doi=10.1017%2fepi.2021.8&partnerID=40&md5=3174a8117a18d9bbf60de555f82a9c8d},
doi = {10.1017/epi.2021.8},
abstract = {Emmalon Davis has offered an insightful analysis of an under-theorized form of epistemic oppression called epistemic appropriation. This occurs when an epistemic resource developed within marginalized situatedness gains inter-communal uptake, but the author of the epistemic resource is unacknowledged. In this paper, I argue that Davis’s definition of epistemic appropriation is not exhaustive. In particular, she misses out on explaining cases of epistemic appropriation in which an intra-communal epistemic resource is obscured through inter-communal uptake. Being attentive to this form of epistemic appropriation allows us to identify unique forms of epistemic oppression that emerge as a result of socially maintained active ignorance. © The Author(s), 2021.},
language = {English},
number = {1},
journal = {Episteme},
author = {Podosky, Paul-Mikhail Catapang},
year = {2023},
note = {Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Type: Article},
pages = {142 -- 162},
}
Downloads: 0
{"_id":"KafyBHFus6HQR9YcH","bibbaseid":"podosky-rethinkingepistemicappropriation-2023","author_short":["Podosky, P. C."],"bibdata":{"bibtype":"article","type":"article","title":"Rethinking Epistemic Appropriation","volume":"20","issn":"17423600","url":"https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85103707745&doi=10.1017%2fepi.2021.8&partnerID=40&md5=3174a8117a18d9bbf60de555f82a9c8d","doi":"10.1017/epi.2021.8","abstract":"Emmalon Davis has offered an insightful analysis of an under-theorized form of epistemic oppression called epistemic appropriation. This occurs when an epistemic resource developed within marginalized situatedness gains inter-communal uptake, but the author of the epistemic resource is unacknowledged. In this paper, I argue that Davis’s definition of epistemic appropriation is not exhaustive. In particular, she misses out on explaining cases of epistemic appropriation in which an intra-communal epistemic resource is obscured through inter-communal uptake. Being attentive to this form of epistemic appropriation allows us to identify unique forms of epistemic oppression that emerge as a result of socially maintained active ignorance. © The Author(s), 2021.","language":"English","number":"1","journal":"Episteme","author":[{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Podosky"],"firstnames":["Paul-Mikhail","Catapang"],"suffixes":[]}],"year":"2023","note":"Publisher: Cambridge University Press Type: Article","pages":"142 – 162","bibtex":"@article{podosky_rethinking_2023,\n\ttitle = {Rethinking {Epistemic} {Appropriation}},\n\tvolume = {20},\n\tissn = {17423600},\n\turl = {https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85103707745&doi=10.1017%2fepi.2021.8&partnerID=40&md5=3174a8117a18d9bbf60de555f82a9c8d},\n\tdoi = {10.1017/epi.2021.8},\n\tabstract = {Emmalon Davis has offered an insightful analysis of an under-theorized form of epistemic oppression called epistemic appropriation. This occurs when an epistemic resource developed within marginalized situatedness gains inter-communal uptake, but the author of the epistemic resource is unacknowledged. In this paper, I argue that Davis’s definition of epistemic appropriation is not exhaustive. In particular, she misses out on explaining cases of epistemic appropriation in which an intra-communal epistemic resource is obscured through inter-communal uptake. Being attentive to this form of epistemic appropriation allows us to identify unique forms of epistemic oppression that emerge as a result of socially maintained active ignorance. © The Author(s), 2021.},\n\tlanguage = {English},\n\tnumber = {1},\n\tjournal = {Episteme},\n\tauthor = {Podosky, Paul-Mikhail Catapang},\n\tyear = {2023},\n\tnote = {Publisher: Cambridge University Press\nType: Article},\n\tpages = {142 -- 162},\n}\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n","author_short":["Podosky, P. C."],"key":"podosky_rethinking_2023","id":"podosky_rethinking_2023","bibbaseid":"podosky-rethinkingepistemicappropriation-2023","role":"author","urls":{"Paper":"https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85103707745&doi=10.1017%2fepi.2021.8&partnerID=40&md5=3174a8117a18d9bbf60de555f82a9c8d"},"metadata":{"authorlinks":{}}},"bibtype":"article","biburl":"http://bibbase.org/zotero-group/science_et_ignorance/1340424","dataSources":["zX4acseCDM6D58AW7"],"keywords":[],"search_terms":["rethinking","epistemic","appropriation","podosky"],"title":"Rethinking Epistemic Appropriation","year":2023}