Sustained Rhythmic Brain Activity Underlies Visual Motion Perception in Zebrafish. Pérez-Schuster, V., Kulkarni, A., Nouvian, M., Romano, S. A., Lygdas, K., Jouary, A., Dipoppa, M., Pietri, T., Haudrechy, M., Candat, V., Boulanger-Weill, J., Hakim, V., & Sumbre, G. Cell Reports, 17(4):1098–1112, October, 2016.
Sustained Rhythmic Brain Activity Underlies Visual Motion Perception in Zebrafish [link]Paper  doi  abstract   bibtex   2 downloads  
Following moving visual stimuli (conditioning stimuli, CS), many organisms perceive, in the absence of physical stimuli, illusory motion in the opposite direction. This phenomenon is known as the motion aftereffect (MAE). Here, we use MAE as a tool to study the neuronal basis of visual motion perception in zebrafish larvae. Using zebrafish eye movements as an indicator of visual motion perception, we find that larvae perceive MAE. Blocking eye movements using optogenetics during CS presentation did not affect MAE, but tectal ablation significantly weakened it. Using two-photon calcium imaging of behaving GCaMP3 larvae, we find post-stimulation sustained rhythmic activity among direction-selective tectal neurons associated with the perception of MAE. In addition, tectal neurons tuned to the CS direction habituated, but neurons in the retina did not. Finally, a model based on competition between direction-selective neurons reproduced MAE, suggesting a neuronal circuit capable of generating perception of visual motion.
@article{perez-schuster_sustained_2016,
	title = {Sustained {Rhythmic} {Brain} {Activity} {Underlies} {Visual} {Motion} {Perception} in {Zebrafish}},
	volume = {17},
	copyright = {Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License (CC-BY-NC-SA)},
	issn = {22111247},
	url = {http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S2211124716313213},
	doi = {10.1016/j.celrep.2016.09.065},
	abstract = {Following moving visual stimuli (conditioning stimuli, CS), many organisms perceive, in the absence of physical stimuli, illusory motion in the opposite direction. This phenomenon is known as the motion aftereffect (MAE). Here, we use MAE as a tool to study the neuronal basis of visual motion perception in zebrafish larvae. Using zebrafish eye movements as an indicator of visual motion perception, we find that larvae perceive MAE. Blocking eye movements using optogenetics during CS presentation did not affect MAE, but tectal ablation significantly weakened it. Using two-photon calcium imaging of behaving GCaMP3 larvae, we find post-stimulation sustained rhythmic activity among direction-selective tectal neurons associated with the perception of MAE. In addition, tectal neurons tuned to the CS direction habituated, but neurons in the retina did not. Finally, a model based on competition between direction-selective neurons reproduced MAE, suggesting a neuronal circuit capable of generating perception of visual motion.},
	number = {4},
	urldate = {2018-11-23},
	journal = {Cell Reports},
	author = {Pérez-Schuster, Verónica and Kulkarni, Anirudh and Nouvian, Morgane and Romano, Sebastián A. and Lygdas, Konstantinos and Jouary, Adrien and Dipoppa, Mario and Pietri, Thomas and Haudrechy, Mathieu and Candat, Virginie and Boulanger-Weill, Jonathan and Hakim, Vincent and Sumbre, Germán},
	month = oct,
	year = {2016},
	pages = {1098--1112},
}
Downloads: 2
About
Documentation
Keywords
Search
Users
Terms and Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Sitemap
© BibBase.org 2021