@article{ Priest1989c,
  author = {Priest, Graham},
  title = {Denyer's $ Not Backed By Sterling Arguments},
  journal = {Mind},
  year = {1989},
  volume = {98},
  pages = {265--268},
  number = {390},
  abstract = {The article discusses the legitimate form of criticism, ad hominem
	which convicts the position in question of being guilty with the
	context of article "Dialetheism and Trivialisation" by Nick Denyer.
	He criticizes the dialetheic solutions to the semantic paradoxes
	by giving an ingenious argument. He also states that failure of Denyer's
	triviality argument have an intellectual integrity which protects
	it from the ad hominem argument.},
  copyright = {Copyright 1989 Oxford University Press},
  doi = {10.1093/mind/XCVIII.390.265 },
  issn = {00264423},
  jstor_formatteddate = {Apr., 1989},
  keywords = {AD hominem arguments FALLACIES (Logic) PARADOXES DIALETHEISM LOGIC},
  language = {English},
  publisher = {Oxford University Press on behalf of the Mind Association},
  urlweb = {http://www.jstor.org/stable/2255130}
}

{"_id":{"_str":"534224b3ecd21cdc07000746"},"__v":2,"authorIDs":["545e77916aaec20d2300084d"],"author_short":["Priest, G."],"bibbaseid":"priest-denyersnotbackedbysterlingarguments-1989","bibdata":{"abstract":"The article discusses the legitimate form of criticism, ad hominem which convicts the position in question of being guilty with the context of article \"Dialetheism and Trivialisation\" by Nick Denyer. He criticizes the dialetheic solutions to the semantic paradoxes by giving an ingenious argument. He also states that failure of Denyer's triviality argument have an intellectual integrity which protects it from the ad hominem argument.","author":["Priest, Graham"],"author_short":["Priest, G."],"bibtex":"@article{ Priest1989c,\n author = {Priest, Graham},\n title = {Denyer's $ Not Backed By Sterling Arguments},\n journal = {Mind},\n year = {1989},\n volume = {98},\n pages = {265--268},\n number = {390},\n abstract = {The article discusses the legitimate form of criticism, ad hominem\n\twhich convicts the position in question of being guilty with the\n\tcontext of article \"Dialetheism and Trivialisation\" by Nick Denyer.\n\tHe criticizes the dialetheic solutions to the semantic paradoxes\n\tby giving an ingenious argument. He also states that failure of Denyer's\n\ttriviality argument have an intellectual integrity which protects\n\tit from the ad hominem argument.},\n copyright = {Copyright 1989 Oxford University Press},\n doi = {10.1093/mind/XCVIII.390.265 },\n issn = {00264423},\n jstor_formatteddate = {Apr., 1989},\n keywords = {AD hominem arguments FALLACIES (Logic) PARADOXES DIALETHEISM LOGIC},\n language = {English},\n publisher = {Oxford University Press on behalf of the Mind Association},\n urlweb = {http://www.jstor.org/stable/2255130}\n}","bibtype":"article","copyright":"Copyright 1989 Oxford University Press","doi":"10.1093/mind/XCVIII.390.265","id":"Priest1989c","issn":"00264423","journal":"Mind","jstor_formatteddate":"Apr., 1989","key":"Priest1989c","keywords":"AD hominem arguments FALLACIES (Logic) PARADOXES DIALETHEISM LOGIC","language":"English","number":"390","pages":"265--268","publisher":"Oxford University Press on behalf of the Mind Association","title":"Denyer's $ Not Backed By Sterling Arguments","type":"article","urlweb":"http://www.jstor.org/stable/2255130","volume":"98","year":"1989","bibbaseid":"priest-denyersnotbackedbysterlingarguments-1989","role":"author","urls":{"Web":"http://www.jstor.org/stable/2255130"},"keyword":["AD hominem arguments FALLACIES (Logic) PARADOXES DIALETHEISM LOGIC"],"downloads":0,"html":""},"bibtype":"article","biburl":"http://www.davidjohnsweeney.net/Papers/Priest_Papers.bib","downloads":0,"keywords":["ad hominem arguments fallacies (logic) paradoxes dialetheism logic"],"search_terms":["denyer","backed","sterling","arguments","priest"],"title":"Denyer's $ Not Backed By Sterling Arguments","year":1989,"dataSources":["f3eXh4mHxBQMWiadr"]}