Thinking with pleasure: Experimenting with drugs and drug research. Race, K. International Journal of Drug Policy, 49:144-149, 2017. abstract bibtex Within the field of drug and alcohol studies, researchers think about pleasure or against it; we analyse, consider, investigate, invoke or ignore it. The philosophically inclined may think of pleasure or write on it, but in each of these scenarios pleasure is kept at an arm's length while the researcher appears to remain unmoved – detached observers, objective scientists, conceptual experts, program directors, sharp critics, policy advocates – sober judges whose sovereignty is secured by the formal conventions of positivist research, established theory, institutional authority and/or disciplinary knowledge. This paper asks what happens when pleasure is allowed to emerge as a constitutive element in the relations of drug and alcohol research. What happens when we conceive our work as thinking with pleasure, rather than simply researching pleasure or thinking about it? I return to the later work of Foucault, reading it alongside conceptions of the experiment drawn from Science and Technology Studies, arguing that both the pleasures of drug consumption and drug research might be conceived more generatively as mutually implicated in events.
@article{
title = {Thinking with pleasure: Experimenting with drugs and drug research},
type = {article},
year = {2017},
identifiers = {[object Object]},
keywords = {Experiments,Foucault,Pleasure,Problematization,Queer theory,Science and Technology Studies},
pages = {144-149},
volume = {49},
id = {462f3451-73a0-3e79-8957-6909ba5d1fb8},
created = {2017-11-10T18:19:08.474Z},
file_attached = {false},
profile_id = {38c6dbcb-2394-3f18-9217-58d777c08c69},
group_id = {d9389c6c-8ab5-3b8b-86ed-33db09ca0198},
last_modified = {2018-05-07T21:43:21.565Z},
tags = {CA},
read = {false},
starred = {false},
authored = {false},
confirmed = {true},
hidden = {false},
citation_key = {Race2017},
private_publication = {false},
abstract = {Within the field of drug and alcohol studies, researchers think about pleasure or against it; we analyse, consider, investigate, invoke or ignore it. The philosophically inclined may think of pleasure or write on it, but in each of these scenarios pleasure is kept at an arm's length while the researcher appears to remain unmoved – detached observers, objective scientists, conceptual experts, program directors, sharp critics, policy advocates – sober judges whose sovereignty is secured by the formal conventions of positivist research, established theory, institutional authority and/or disciplinary knowledge. This paper asks what happens when pleasure is allowed to emerge as a constitutive element in the relations of drug and alcohol research. What happens when we conceive our work as thinking with pleasure, rather than simply researching pleasure or thinking about it? I return to the later work of Foucault, reading it alongside conceptions of the experiment drawn from Science and Technology Studies, arguing that both the pleasures of drug consumption and drug research might be conceived more generatively as mutually implicated in events.},
bibtype = {article},
author = {Race, Kane},
journal = {International Journal of Drug Policy}
}
Downloads: 0
{"_id":"7pBkqZWerWLNdEK92","bibbaseid":"race-thinkingwithpleasureexperimentingwithdrugsanddrugresearch-2017","downloads":0,"creationDate":"2017-11-14T11:54:38.690Z","title":"Thinking with pleasure: Experimenting with drugs and drug research","author_short":["Race, K."],"year":2017,"bibtype":"article","biburl":null,"bibdata":{"title":"Thinking with pleasure: Experimenting with drugs and drug research","type":"article","year":"2017","identifiers":"[object Object]","keywords":"Experiments,Foucault,Pleasure,Problematization,Queer theory,Science and Technology Studies","pages":"144-149","volume":"49","id":"462f3451-73a0-3e79-8957-6909ba5d1fb8","created":"2017-11-10T18:19:08.474Z","file_attached":false,"profile_id":"38c6dbcb-2394-3f18-9217-58d777c08c69","group_id":"d9389c6c-8ab5-3b8b-86ed-33db09ca0198","last_modified":"2018-05-07T21:43:21.565Z","tags":"CA","read":false,"starred":false,"authored":false,"confirmed":"true","hidden":false,"citation_key":"Race2017","private_publication":false,"abstract":"Within the field of drug and alcohol studies, researchers think about pleasure or against it; we analyse, consider, investigate, invoke or ignore it. The philosophically inclined may think of pleasure or write on it, but in each of these scenarios pleasure is kept at an arm's length while the researcher appears to remain unmoved – detached observers, objective scientists, conceptual experts, program directors, sharp critics, policy advocates – sober judges whose sovereignty is secured by the formal conventions of positivist research, established theory, institutional authority and/or disciplinary knowledge. This paper asks what happens when pleasure is allowed to emerge as a constitutive element in the relations of drug and alcohol research. What happens when we conceive our work as thinking with pleasure, rather than simply researching pleasure or thinking about it? I return to the later work of Foucault, reading it alongside conceptions of the experiment drawn from Science and Technology Studies, arguing that both the pleasures of drug consumption and drug research might be conceived more generatively as mutually implicated in events.","bibtype":"article","author":"Race, Kane","journal":"International Journal of Drug Policy","bibtex":"@article{\n title = {Thinking with pleasure: Experimenting with drugs and drug research},\n type = {article},\n year = {2017},\n identifiers = {[object Object]},\n keywords = {Experiments,Foucault,Pleasure,Problematization,Queer theory,Science and Technology Studies},\n pages = {144-149},\n volume = {49},\n id = {462f3451-73a0-3e79-8957-6909ba5d1fb8},\n created = {2017-11-10T18:19:08.474Z},\n file_attached = {false},\n profile_id = {38c6dbcb-2394-3f18-9217-58d777c08c69},\n group_id = {d9389c6c-8ab5-3b8b-86ed-33db09ca0198},\n last_modified = {2018-05-07T21:43:21.565Z},\n tags = {CA},\n read = {false},\n starred = {false},\n authored = {false},\n confirmed = {true},\n hidden = {false},\n citation_key = {Race2017},\n private_publication = {false},\n abstract = {Within the field of drug and alcohol studies, researchers think about pleasure or against it; we analyse, consider, investigate, invoke or ignore it. The philosophically inclined may think of pleasure or write on it, but in each of these scenarios pleasure is kept at an arm's length while the researcher appears to remain unmoved – detached observers, objective scientists, conceptual experts, program directors, sharp critics, policy advocates – sober judges whose sovereignty is secured by the formal conventions of positivist research, established theory, institutional authority and/or disciplinary knowledge. This paper asks what happens when pleasure is allowed to emerge as a constitutive element in the relations of drug and alcohol research. What happens when we conceive our work as thinking with pleasure, rather than simply researching pleasure or thinking about it? I return to the later work of Foucault, reading it alongside conceptions of the experiment drawn from Science and Technology Studies, arguing that both the pleasures of drug consumption and drug research might be conceived more generatively as mutually implicated in events.},\n bibtype = {article},\n author = {Race, Kane},\n journal = {International Journal of Drug Policy}\n}","author_short":["Race, K."],"bibbaseid":"race-thinkingwithpleasureexperimentingwithdrugsanddrugresearch-2017","role":"author","urls":{},"keyword":["Experiments","Foucault","Pleasure","Problematization","Queer theory","Science and Technology Studies"],"downloads":0},"search_terms":["thinking","pleasure","experimenting","drugs","drug","research","race"],"keywords":["experiments","foucault","pleasure","problematization","queer theory","science and technology studies"],"authorIDs":[]}