On inferentialism. Radford, L. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 29(4):493–508, December, 2017.
Paper doi abstract bibtex This article is a critical commentary on inferentialism in mathematics education. In the first part, I comment on some of the major shortcomings that inferentialists see in the theoretical underpinnings of representationalist, empiricist, and socioconstructivist mathematics education theories. I discuss in particular the criticism that inferentialism makes of the social dimension as conceptualized by socioconstructivism and the question related to the objectivity of knowledge. In the second part, I discuss some of the theoretical foundations of inferentialism in mathematics education and try to answer the question of whether or not inferentialism overcomes the individual-social divide. In the third part, I speculate on what I think inferentialism accomplishes and what I think it does not.
@article{radford_inferentialism_2017,
title = {On inferentialism},
volume = {29},
issn = {1033-2170, 2211-050X},
url = {http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s13394-017-0225-3},
doi = {10.1007/s13394-017-0225-3},
abstract = {This article is a critical commentary on inferentialism in mathematics education. In the first part, I comment on some of the major shortcomings that inferentialists see in the theoretical underpinnings of representationalist, empiricist, and socioconstructivist mathematics education theories. I discuss in particular the criticism that inferentialism makes of the social dimension as conceptualized by socioconstructivism and the question related to the objectivity of knowledge. In the second part, I discuss some of the theoretical foundations of inferentialism in mathematics education and try to answer the question of whether or not inferentialism overcomes the individual-social divide. In the third part, I speculate on what I think inferentialism accomplishes and what I think it does not.},
language = {en},
number = {4},
urldate = {2023-03-23},
journal = {Mathematics Education Research Journal},
author = {Radford, Luis},
month = dec,
year = {2017},
pages = {493--508},
}
Downloads: 0
{"_id":"ykAz4RLv9DPzccaWv","bibbaseid":"radford-oninferentialism-2017","author_short":["Radford, L."],"bibdata":{"bibtype":"article","type":"article","title":"On inferentialism","volume":"29","issn":"1033-2170, 2211-050X","url":"http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s13394-017-0225-3","doi":"10.1007/s13394-017-0225-3","abstract":"This article is a critical commentary on inferentialism in mathematics education. In the first part, I comment on some of the major shortcomings that inferentialists see in the theoretical underpinnings of representationalist, empiricist, and socioconstructivist mathematics education theories. I discuss in particular the criticism that inferentialism makes of the social dimension as conceptualized by socioconstructivism and the question related to the objectivity of knowledge. In the second part, I discuss some of the theoretical foundations of inferentialism in mathematics education and try to answer the question of whether or not inferentialism overcomes the individual-social divide. In the third part, I speculate on what I think inferentialism accomplishes and what I think it does not.","language":"en","number":"4","urldate":"2023-03-23","journal":"Mathematics Education Research Journal","author":[{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Radford"],"firstnames":["Luis"],"suffixes":[]}],"month":"December","year":"2017","pages":"493–508","bibtex":"@article{radford_inferentialism_2017,\n\ttitle = {On inferentialism},\n\tvolume = {29},\n\tissn = {1033-2170, 2211-050X},\n\turl = {http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s13394-017-0225-3},\n\tdoi = {10.1007/s13394-017-0225-3},\n\tabstract = {This article is a critical commentary on inferentialism in mathematics education. In the first part, I comment on some of the major shortcomings that inferentialists see in the theoretical underpinnings of representationalist, empiricist, and socioconstructivist mathematics education theories. I discuss in particular the criticism that inferentialism makes of the social dimension as conceptualized by socioconstructivism and the question related to the objectivity of knowledge. In the second part, I discuss some of the theoretical foundations of inferentialism in mathematics education and try to answer the question of whether or not inferentialism overcomes the individual-social divide. In the third part, I speculate on what I think inferentialism accomplishes and what I think it does not.},\n\tlanguage = {en},\n\tnumber = {4},\n\turldate = {2023-03-23},\n\tjournal = {Mathematics Education Research Journal},\n\tauthor = {Radford, Luis},\n\tmonth = dec,\n\tyear = {2017},\n\tpages = {493--508},\n}\n\n\n\n","author_short":["Radford, L."],"key":"radford_inferentialism_2017","id":"radford_inferentialism_2017","bibbaseid":"radford-oninferentialism-2017","role":"author","urls":{"Paper":"http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s13394-017-0225-3"},"metadata":{"authorlinks":{}},"html":""},"bibtype":"article","biburl":"https://bibbase.org/zotero/changgeun.song","dataSources":["AtQERgSdNvAihdqY8"],"keywords":[],"search_terms":["inferentialism","radford"],"title":"On inferentialism","year":2017}