Effects of inhibition of return on voluntary and visually guided saccades. Special Issue: Shifts of visual attention. Rafal, R., Egly, R., & Rhodes, D. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 48(2):284–300, 1994. doi abstract bibtex Four experiments examined the effects of exogenously and endogenously activated inhibition of return (IOR) on endogenously generated and visually guided saccades. In Exps 1-3, 37 Ss responded to a peripheral target by making either a prosaccade (toward the target) or an antisaccade (toward the field opposite the target). Results of Exps 1 and 3 suggest that when IOR is activated by a peripheral precue, it functions as a location tagging mechanism that inhibits detection of signals at the tagged location; thus, IOR cannot simply be a motor alternation bias. Exp 2 showed that IOR could be generated by the execution of an endogenous saccade. Unlike Exp 1, however, IOR was manifest only in the prosaccade task. Exp 4, in which 24 Ss made endogenous saccades in response to a central arrow target, provided some evidence that IOR can influence the latency of endogenously generated saccades to the precued location. (French abstract) (PsycINFO Database Copyright 1995 American Psychological Assn, all rights reserved).
@article{rafal_effects_1994,
title = {Effects of inhibition of return on voluntary and visually guided saccades. {Special} {Issue}: {Shifts} of visual attention},
volume = {48},
doi = {10/bdr3x4},
abstract = {Four experiments examined the effects of exogenously and endogenously activated inhibition of return (IOR) on endogenously generated and visually guided saccades. In Exps 1-3, 37 Ss responded to a peripheral target by making either a prosaccade (toward the target) or an antisaccade (toward the field opposite the target). Results of Exps 1 and 3 suggest that when IOR is activated by a peripheral precue, it functions as a location tagging mechanism that inhibits detection of signals at the tagged location; thus, IOR cannot simply be a motor alternation bias. Exp 2 showed that IOR could be generated by the execution of an endogenous saccade. Unlike Exp 1, however, IOR was manifest only in the prosaccade task. Exp 4, in which 24 Ss made endogenous saccades in response to a central arrow target, provided some evidence that IOR can influence the latency of endogenously generated saccades to the precued location. (French abstract) (PsycINFO Database Copyright 1995 American Psychological Assn, all rights reserved).},
number = {2},
journal = {Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology},
author = {Rafal, R.D. and Egly, R. and Rhodes, D.},
year = {1994},
keywords = {\#nosource, exogenously vs endogenously activated inhibition of return, voluntary \& visually guided saccades to targets in precued vs uncued location, adults. Eye Movements Cues Visual Stimulation Perceptual Localization Visual Perception (2323).},
pages = {284--300},
}
Downloads: 0
{"_id":"RT3sogmGKAZrx3zLr","bibbaseid":"rafal-egly-rhodes-effectsofinhibitionofreturnonvoluntaryandvisuallyguidedsaccadesspecialissueshiftsofvisualattention-1994","author_short":["Rafal, R.","Egly, R.","Rhodes, D."],"bibdata":{"bibtype":"article","type":"article","title":"Effects of inhibition of return on voluntary and visually guided saccades. Special Issue: Shifts of visual attention","volume":"48","doi":"10/bdr3x4","abstract":"Four experiments examined the effects of exogenously and endogenously activated inhibition of return (IOR) on endogenously generated and visually guided saccades. In Exps 1-3, 37 Ss responded to a peripheral target by making either a prosaccade (toward the target) or an antisaccade (toward the field opposite the target). Results of Exps 1 and 3 suggest that when IOR is activated by a peripheral precue, it functions as a location tagging mechanism that inhibits detection of signals at the tagged location; thus, IOR cannot simply be a motor alternation bias. Exp 2 showed that IOR could be generated by the execution of an endogenous saccade. Unlike Exp 1, however, IOR was manifest only in the prosaccade task. Exp 4, in which 24 Ss made endogenous saccades in response to a central arrow target, provided some evidence that IOR can influence the latency of endogenously generated saccades to the precued location. (French abstract) (PsycINFO Database Copyright 1995 American Psychological Assn, all rights reserved).","number":"2","journal":"Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology","author":[{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Rafal"],"firstnames":["R.D."],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Egly"],"firstnames":["R."],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Rhodes"],"firstnames":["D."],"suffixes":[]}],"year":"1994","keywords":"#nosource, exogenously vs endogenously activated inhibition of return, voluntary & visually guided saccades to targets in precued vs uncued location, adults. Eye Movements Cues Visual Stimulation Perceptual Localization Visual Perception (2323).","pages":"284–300","bibtex":"@article{rafal_effects_1994,\n\ttitle = {Effects of inhibition of return on voluntary and visually guided saccades. {Special} {Issue}: {Shifts} of visual attention},\n\tvolume = {48},\n\tdoi = {10/bdr3x4},\n\tabstract = {Four experiments examined the effects of exogenously and endogenously activated inhibition of return (IOR) on endogenously generated and visually guided saccades. In Exps 1-3, 37 Ss responded to a peripheral target by making either a prosaccade (toward the target) or an antisaccade (toward the field opposite the target). Results of Exps 1 and 3 suggest that when IOR is activated by a peripheral precue, it functions as a location tagging mechanism that inhibits detection of signals at the tagged location; thus, IOR cannot simply be a motor alternation bias. Exp 2 showed that IOR could be generated by the execution of an endogenous saccade. Unlike Exp 1, however, IOR was manifest only in the prosaccade task. Exp 4, in which 24 Ss made endogenous saccades in response to a central arrow target, provided some evidence that IOR can influence the latency of endogenously generated saccades to the precued location. (French abstract) (PsycINFO Database Copyright 1995 American Psychological Assn, all rights reserved).},\n\tnumber = {2},\n\tjournal = {Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology},\n\tauthor = {Rafal, R.D. and Egly, R. and Rhodes, D.},\n\tyear = {1994},\n\tkeywords = {\\#nosource, exogenously vs endogenously activated inhibition of return, voluntary \\& visually guided saccades to targets in precued vs uncued location, adults. Eye Movements Cues Visual Stimulation Perceptual Localization Visual Perception (2323).},\n\tpages = {284--300},\n}\n\n","author_short":["Rafal, R.","Egly, R.","Rhodes, D."],"key":"rafal_effects_1994","id":"rafal_effects_1994","bibbaseid":"rafal-egly-rhodes-effectsofinhibitionofreturnonvoluntaryandvisuallyguidedsaccadesspecialissueshiftsofvisualattention-1994","role":"author","urls":{},"keyword":["#nosource","exogenously vs endogenously activated inhibition of return","voluntary & visually guided saccades to targets in precued vs uncued location","adults. Eye Movements Cues Visual Stimulation Perceptual Localization Visual Perception (2323)."],"metadata":{"authorlinks":{}},"html":""},"bibtype":"article","biburl":"https://bibbase.org/zotero/marsicanus","dataSources":["MDN92uztrK9rBiHJj"],"keywords":["#nosource","exogenously vs endogenously activated inhibition of return","voluntary & visually guided saccades to targets in precued vs uncued location","adults. eye movements cues visual stimulation perceptual localization visual perception (2323)."],"search_terms":["effects","inhibition","return","voluntary","visually","guided","saccades","special","issue","shifts","visual","attention","rafal","egly","rhodes"],"title":"Effects of inhibition of return on voluntary and visually guided saccades. Special Issue: Shifts of visual attention","year":1994}