IGS polar motion measurement accuracy. Ray, J., Rebischung, P., & Griffiths, J. 8(6):413–420. Number: 6
IGS polar motion measurement accuracy [link]Paper  doi  abstract   bibtex   
We elaborate an error budget for the long-term accuracy of IGS (International Global Navigation Satellite System Service) polar motion estimates, concluding that it is probably about 25–30 μas (1-sigma) overall, although it is not possible to quantify possible contributions (mainly annual) that might transfer directly from aliases of subdaily rotational tide errors. The leading sources are biases arising from the need to align daily, observed terrestrial frames, within which the pole coordinates are expressed and which are continuously deforming, to the secular, linear international reference frame. Such biases are largest over spans longer than about a year. Thanks to the very large number of IGS tracking stations, the formal covariance errors are much smaller, around 5 to 10 μas. Large networks also permit the systematic frame-related errors to be more effectively minimized but not eliminated. A number of periodic errors probably also influence polar motion results, mainly at annual, GPS (Global Positioning System) draconitic, and fortnightly periods, but their impact on the overall error budget is unlikely to be significant except possibly for annual tidal aliases. Nevertheless, caution should be exercised in interpreting geophysical excitations near any of the suspect periods.
@article{ray_igs_2017,
	title = {{IGS} polar motion measurement accuracy},
	volume = {8},
	issn = {1674-9847},
	url = {http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1674984716301446},
	doi = {10.1016/j.geog.2017.01.008},
	series = {Geodesy, Astronomy and Geophysics in Earth Rotation},
	abstract = {We elaborate an error budget for the long-term accuracy of {IGS} (International Global Navigation Satellite System Service) polar motion estimates, concluding that it is probably about 25–30 μas (1-sigma) overall, although it is not possible to quantify possible contributions (mainly annual) that might transfer directly from aliases of subdaily rotational tide errors. The leading sources are biases arising from the need to align daily, observed terrestrial frames, within which the pole coordinates are expressed and which are continuously deforming, to the secular, linear international reference frame. Such biases are largest over spans longer than about a year. Thanks to the very large number of {IGS} tracking stations, the formal covariance errors are much smaller, around 5 to 10 μas. Large networks also permit the systematic frame-related errors to be more effectively minimized but not eliminated. A number of periodic errors probably also influence polar motion results, mainly at annual, {GPS} (Global Positioning System) draconitic, and fortnightly periods, but their impact on the overall error budget is unlikely to be significant except possibly for annual tidal aliases. Nevertheless, caution should be exercised in interpreting geophysical excitations near any of the suspect periods.},
	pages = {413--420},
	number = {6},
	journaltitle = {Geodesy and Geodynamics},
	shortjournal = {Geodesy and Geodynamics},
	author = {Ray, Jim and Rebischung, Paul and Griffiths, Jake},
	urldate = {2020-01-27},
	date = {2017-11-01},
	langid = {english},
	note = {Number: 6},
	keywords = {Accuracy, {EOPs} (Earth orientation parameters), {GPS} (Global Positioning System), {IGS} (International {GNSS} Service), {PM} (Polar motion)}
}
Downloads: 0