Temporary suppression of visual processing in an RSVP task: An attentional blink?. Raymond, J., Shapiro, K., & Arnell, K. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 18(3):849–860, 1992. doi abstract bibtex Through rapid serial visual presentation (RSVP), the authors asked Ss to identify a partially specified letter (target) and then to detect the presence or absence of a fully specified letter (probe). Whereas targets are accurately identified, probes are poorly detected when they are presented during a 270-msec interval beginning 180 msec after the target. Probes presented immediately after the target or later in the RSVP stream are accurately detected. This temporary reduction in probe detection was not found in conditions in which a brief blank interval followed the target or Ss were not required to identify the target. The data suggest that the presentation of stimuli after the target but before target-identification processes are complete produces interference at a letter-recognition stage. This interference may cause the temporary suppression of visual attention mechanisms observed in the present study. (PsycINFO Database Copyright 1992 American Psychological Assn, all rights reserved).
@article{raymond_temporary_1992,
title = {Temporary suppression of visual processing in an {RSVP} task: {An} attentional blink?},
volume = {18},
doi = {10/bbztdn},
abstract = {Through rapid serial visual presentation (RSVP), the authors asked Ss to identify a partially specified letter (target) and then to detect the presence or absence of a fully specified letter (probe). Whereas targets are accurately identified, probes are poorly detected when they are presented during a 270-msec interval beginning 180 msec after the target. Probes presented immediately after the target or later in the RSVP stream are accurately detected. This temporary reduction in probe detection was not found in conditions in which a brief blank interval followed the target or Ss were not required to identify the target. The data suggest that the presentation of stimuli after the target but before target-identification processes are complete produces interference at a letter-recognition stage. This interference may cause the temporary suppression of visual attention mechanisms observed in the present study. (PsycINFO Database Copyright 1992 American Psychological Assn, all rights reserved).},
number = {3},
journal = {Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception \& Performance},
author = {Raymond, J.E. and Shapiro, K.L. and Arnell, K.M.},
year = {1992},
keywords = {\#nosource, attention to \& perception of partially specified target vs fully specified probe letter in rapid serial visual presentation, college students, Canada. Attention Letters (Alphabet) Visual Discrimination Visual Perception (2323).},
pages = {849--860},
}
Downloads: 0
{"_id":"vPDyYx4i2zmzaQqrA","bibbaseid":"raymond-shapiro-arnell-temporarysuppressionofvisualprocessinginanrsvptaskanattentionalblink-1992","downloads":0,"creationDate":"2015-02-08T05:14:55.768Z","title":"Temporary suppression of visual processing in an RSVP task: An attentional blink?","author_short":["Raymond, J.","Shapiro, K.","Arnell, K."],"year":1992,"bibtype":"article","biburl":"https://bibbase.org/zotero/marsicanus","bibdata":{"bibtype":"article","type":"article","title":"Temporary suppression of visual processing in an RSVP task: An attentional blink?","volume":"18","doi":"10/bbztdn","abstract":"Through rapid serial visual presentation (RSVP), the authors asked Ss to identify a partially specified letter (target) and then to detect the presence or absence of a fully specified letter (probe). Whereas targets are accurately identified, probes are poorly detected when they are presented during a 270-msec interval beginning 180 msec after the target. Probes presented immediately after the target or later in the RSVP stream are accurately detected. This temporary reduction in probe detection was not found in conditions in which a brief blank interval followed the target or Ss were not required to identify the target. The data suggest that the presentation of stimuli after the target but before target-identification processes are complete produces interference at a letter-recognition stage. This interference may cause the temporary suppression of visual attention mechanisms observed in the present study. (PsycINFO Database Copyright 1992 American Psychological Assn, all rights reserved).","number":"3","journal":"Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance","author":[{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Raymond"],"firstnames":["J.E."],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Shapiro"],"firstnames":["K.L."],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Arnell"],"firstnames":["K.M."],"suffixes":[]}],"year":"1992","keywords":"#nosource, attention to & perception of partially specified target vs fully specified probe letter in rapid serial visual presentation, college students, Canada. Attention Letters (Alphabet) Visual Discrimination Visual Perception (2323).","pages":"849–860","bibtex":"@article{raymond_temporary_1992,\n\ttitle = {Temporary suppression of visual processing in an {RSVP} task: {An} attentional blink?},\n\tvolume = {18},\n\tdoi = {10/bbztdn},\n\tabstract = {Through rapid serial visual presentation (RSVP), the authors asked Ss to identify a partially specified letter (target) and then to detect the presence or absence of a fully specified letter (probe). Whereas targets are accurately identified, probes are poorly detected when they are presented during a 270-msec interval beginning 180 msec after the target. Probes presented immediately after the target or later in the RSVP stream are accurately detected. This temporary reduction in probe detection was not found in conditions in which a brief blank interval followed the target or Ss were not required to identify the target. The data suggest that the presentation of stimuli after the target but before target-identification processes are complete produces interference at a letter-recognition stage. This interference may cause the temporary suppression of visual attention mechanisms observed in the present study. (PsycINFO Database Copyright 1992 American Psychological Assn, all rights reserved).},\n\tnumber = {3},\n\tjournal = {Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception \\& Performance},\n\tauthor = {Raymond, J.E. and Shapiro, K.L. and Arnell, K.M.},\n\tyear = {1992},\n\tkeywords = {\\#nosource, attention to \\& perception of partially specified target vs fully specified probe letter in rapid serial visual presentation, college students, Canada. Attention Letters (Alphabet) Visual Discrimination Visual Perception (2323).},\n\tpages = {849--860},\n}\n\n","author_short":["Raymond, J.","Shapiro, K.","Arnell, K."],"key":"raymond_temporary_1992","id":"raymond_temporary_1992","bibbaseid":"raymond-shapiro-arnell-temporarysuppressionofvisualprocessinginanrsvptaskanattentionalblink-1992","role":"author","urls":{},"keyword":["#nosource","attention to & perception of partially specified target vs fully specified probe letter in rapid serial visual presentation","college students","Canada. Attention Letters (Alphabet) Visual Discrimination Visual Perception (2323)."],"metadata":{"authorlinks":{}},"html":""},"search_terms":["temporary","suppression","visual","processing","rsvp","task","attentional","blink","raymond","shapiro","arnell"],"keywords":["#nosource","attention to & perception of partially specified target vs fully specified probe letter in rapid serial visual presentation","college students","canada. attention letters (alphabet) visual discrimination visual perception (2323)."],"authorIDs":[],"dataSources":["ErLXoH8mqSjESnrN5","MDN92uztrK9rBiHJj"]}