@article{
 title = {Toward a Pluralistic Civic Science?: Assessing Community Forestry},
 type = {article},
 year = {2006},
 identifiers = {[object Object]},
 pages = {591-607},
 volume = {19},
 websites = {http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/08941920600742344},
 month = {8},
 publisher = {Routledge},
 id = {7985de24-73ef-358f-895c-e388d01877af},
 created = {2013-03-19T12:17:21.000Z},
 accessed = {2013-01-22},
 file_attached = {true},
 profile_id = {45884df0-82c1-344d-8b99-4dee6c89b79d},
 group_id = {ab695928-535d-3373-a630-70913ea6b675},
 last_modified = {2013-09-05T16:53:13.000Z},
 read = {false},
 starred = {false},
 authored = {false},
 confirmed = {true},
 hidden = {false},
 citation_key = {Reed2006},
 abstract = {While stakeholder involvement in environmental management is now common, we suggest that stakeholders can contribute to a pluralistic civic science that incorporates local knowledge directly into environmental decision making and research. We consider how insights from feminist scholarship might help us to understand the influence of power relations among our subjects of study and in determining how scientific knowledge is defined and used. We pay particular attention to how knowledge is produced, how participation is constrained, and to what extent community participants and researchers would benefit from critical reflection in their work. We apply these elements to an assessment of a community forestry pilot project in Burns Lake, British Columbia, Canada. Our findings suggest that while local participants have considered community forestry effective, practices have not met the ideals of a pluralistic civic science. We identify some of the reasons for this discrepancy and provide suggestions for future practice.
While stakeholder involvement in environmental management is now common, we suggest that stakeholders can contribute to a pluralistic civic science that incorporates local knowledge directly into environmental decision making and research. We consider how insights from feminist scholarship might help us to understand the influence of power relations among our subjects of study and in determining how scientific knowledge is defined and used. We pay particular attention to how knowledge is produced, how participation is constrained, and to what extent community participants and researchers would benefit from critical reflection in their work. We apply these elements to an assessment of a community forestry pilot project in Burns Lake, British Columbia, Canada. Our findings suggest that while local participants have considered community forestry effective, practices have not met the ideals of a pluralistic civic science. We identify some of the reasons for this discrepancy and provide suggestions for future practice.},
 bibtype = {article},
 author = {Reed, Maureen G. and McIlveen, Kirsten},
 journal = {Society & Natural Resources},
 number = {7}
}

{"_id":"AHA98KpMajzPLC2JA","bibbaseid":"reed-mcilveen-towardapluralisticcivicscienceassessingcommunityforestry-2006","downloads":0,"creationDate":"2016-03-15T09:40:25.152Z","title":"Toward a Pluralistic Civic Science?: Assessing Community Forestry","author_short":["Reed, M., G.","McIlveen, K."],"year":2006,"bibtype":"article","biburl":null,"bibdata":{"title":"Toward a Pluralistic Civic Science?: Assessing Community Forestry","type":"article","year":"2006","identifiers":"[object Object]","pages":"591-607","volume":"19","websites":"http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/08941920600742344","month":"8","publisher":"Routledge","id":"7985de24-73ef-358f-895c-e388d01877af","created":"2013-03-19T12:17:21.000Z","accessed":"2013-01-22","file_attached":"true","profile_id":"45884df0-82c1-344d-8b99-4dee6c89b79d","group_id":"ab695928-535d-3373-a630-70913ea6b675","last_modified":"2013-09-05T16:53:13.000Z","read":false,"starred":false,"authored":false,"confirmed":"true","hidden":false,"citation_key":"Reed2006","abstract":"While stakeholder involvement in environmental management is now common, we suggest that stakeholders can contribute to a pluralistic civic science that incorporates local knowledge directly into environmental decision making and research. We consider how insights from feminist scholarship might help us to understand the influence of power relations among our subjects of study and in determining how scientific knowledge is defined and used. We pay particular attention to how knowledge is produced, how participation is constrained, and to what extent community participants and researchers would benefit from critical reflection in their work. We apply these elements to an assessment of a community forestry pilot project in Burns Lake, British Columbia, Canada. Our findings suggest that while local participants have considered community forestry effective, practices have not met the ideals of a pluralistic civic science. We identify some of the reasons for this discrepancy and provide suggestions for future practice.\nWhile stakeholder involvement in environmental management is now common, we suggest that stakeholders can contribute to a pluralistic civic science that incorporates local knowledge directly into environmental decision making and research. We consider how insights from feminist scholarship might help us to understand the influence of power relations among our subjects of study and in determining how scientific knowledge is defined and used. We pay particular attention to how knowledge is produced, how participation is constrained, and to what extent community participants and researchers would benefit from critical reflection in their work. We apply these elements to an assessment of a community forestry pilot project in Burns Lake, British Columbia, Canada. Our findings suggest that while local participants have considered community forestry effective, practices have not met the ideals of a pluralistic civic science. We identify some of the reasons for this discrepancy and provide suggestions for future practice.","bibtype":"article","author":"Reed, Maureen G. and McIlveen, Kirsten","journal":"Society & Natural Resources","number":"7","bibtex":"@article{\n title = {Toward a Pluralistic Civic Science?: Assessing Community Forestry},\n type = {article},\n year = {2006},\n identifiers = {[object Object]},\n pages = {591-607},\n volume = {19},\n websites = {http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/08941920600742344},\n month = {8},\n publisher = {Routledge},\n id = {7985de24-73ef-358f-895c-e388d01877af},\n created = {2013-03-19T12:17:21.000Z},\n accessed = {2013-01-22},\n file_attached = {true},\n profile_id = {45884df0-82c1-344d-8b99-4dee6c89b79d},\n group_id = {ab695928-535d-3373-a630-70913ea6b675},\n last_modified = {2013-09-05T16:53:13.000Z},\n read = {false},\n starred = {false},\n authored = {false},\n confirmed = {true},\n hidden = {false},\n citation_key = {Reed2006},\n abstract = {While stakeholder involvement in environmental management is now common, we suggest that stakeholders can contribute to a pluralistic civic science that incorporates local knowledge directly into environmental decision making and research. We consider how insights from feminist scholarship might help us to understand the influence of power relations among our subjects of study and in determining how scientific knowledge is defined and used. We pay particular attention to how knowledge is produced, how participation is constrained, and to what extent community participants and researchers would benefit from critical reflection in their work. We apply these elements to an assessment of a community forestry pilot project in Burns Lake, British Columbia, Canada. Our findings suggest that while local participants have considered community forestry effective, practices have not met the ideals of a pluralistic civic science. We identify some of the reasons for this discrepancy and provide suggestions for future practice.\nWhile stakeholder involvement in environmental management is now common, we suggest that stakeholders can contribute to a pluralistic civic science that incorporates local knowledge directly into environmental decision making and research. We consider how insights from feminist scholarship might help us to understand the influence of power relations among our subjects of study and in determining how scientific knowledge is defined and used. We pay particular attention to how knowledge is produced, how participation is constrained, and to what extent community participants and researchers would benefit from critical reflection in their work. We apply these elements to an assessment of a community forestry pilot project in Burns Lake, British Columbia, Canada. Our findings suggest that while local participants have considered community forestry effective, practices have not met the ideals of a pluralistic civic science. We identify some of the reasons for this discrepancy and provide suggestions for future practice.},\n bibtype = {article},\n author = {Reed, Maureen G. and McIlveen, Kirsten},\n journal = {Society & Natural Resources},\n number = {7}\n}","author_short":["Reed, M., G.","McIlveen, K."],"urls":{"Paper":"http://bibbase.org/service/mendeley/4f16c058-a984-39f6-a498-12d84e30c6e7/file/4ead1b84-97ce-1749-39f3-78d4669659ba/2006-Toward_a_Pluralistic_Civic_Science_Assessing_Community_Forestry.html.pdf","Website":"http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/08941920600742344"},"bibbaseid":"reed-mcilveen-towardapluralisticcivicscienceassessingcommunityforestry-2006","role":"author","downloads":0},"search_terms":["toward","pluralistic","civic","science","assessing","community","forestry","reed","mcilveen"],"keywords":[],"authorIDs":[]}