Who Needs to Tell the Truth? - Epistemic Injustice and Truth and Reconciliation Commissions for Minorities in Non-Transitional Societies. Reibold, K. Episteme, 2024. Publisher: Cambridge University Press Type: Article
Who Needs to Tell the Truth? - Epistemic Injustice and Truth and Reconciliation Commissions for Minorities in Non-Transitional Societies [link]Paper  doi  abstract   bibtex   
Truth and Reconciliation Commissions (TRCs) have become a widely used tool to reconcile societies in the aftermath of widespread injustice or social and political conflict in a state. This article focuses on TRCs that take place in non-transitional societies in which the political and social structures, institutions, and power relations have largely remained in place since the time of injustice. Furthermore, it will focus on one particular injustice that TRCs try to address through the practice of truth-telling, namely the eradication of epistemic injustice. The article takes the Canadian and Norwegian TRCs as two examples to show that under conditions of enduring injustice, willful ignorance of the majority, and power inequality, TRCs might create a double bind for victims which makes them choose between epistemic exploitation and continued injustices based on the majority's ignorance. The article argues that the set-up and accompanying measures of TRCs are of the utmost importance if TRCs in non-transitional societies are to overcome epistemic injustice, instead of creating new relations of exploitation. Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press.
@article{reibold_who_2024,
	title = {Who {Needs} to {Tell} the {Truth}? - {Epistemic} {Injustice} and {Truth} and {Reconciliation} {Commissions} for {Minorities} in {Non}-{Transitional} {Societies}},
	issn = {17423600},
	url = {https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85182206211&doi=10.1017%2fepi.2023.59&partnerID=40&md5=780995ee4a2092b5698d4a2f097284f3},
	doi = {10.1017/epi.2023.59},
	abstract = {Truth and Reconciliation Commissions (TRCs) have become a widely used tool to reconcile societies in the aftermath of widespread injustice or social and political conflict in a state. This article focuses on TRCs that take place in non-transitional societies in which the political and social structures, institutions, and power relations have largely remained in place since the time of injustice. Furthermore, it will focus on one particular injustice that TRCs try to address through the practice of truth-telling, namely the eradication of epistemic injustice. The article takes the Canadian and Norwegian TRCs as two examples to show that under conditions of enduring injustice, willful ignorance of the majority, and power inequality, TRCs might create a double bind for victims which makes them choose between epistemic exploitation and continued injustices based on the majority's ignorance. The article argues that the set-up and accompanying measures of TRCs are of the utmost importance if TRCs in non-transitional societies are to overcome epistemic injustice, instead of creating new relations of exploitation. Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press.},
	language = {English},
	journal = {Episteme},
	author = {Reibold, Kerstin},
	year = {2024},
	note = {Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Type: Article},
}

Downloads: 0