The problem of ‘trickle-down science’ from the Global North to the Global South. Reidpath, D. D. & Allotey, P. BMJ Global Health, 4(4):e001719, July, 2019. Publisher: BMJ Specialist Journals Section: Commentary
The problem of ‘trickle-down science’ from the Global North to the Global South [link]Paper  doi  abstract   bibtex   
### Summary box Trickle-down economics holds that the way to lift the poor out of poverty is to support wealth creation in those who are already rich.1 The underlying assumption is that as the wealth of the rich grows, they will purchase more goods and services, creating opportunities for the less well-off to benefit. The theory is in direct contrast to one that actively redistributes wealth. The analogy in science is that the way to improve science in the less developed parts of the world (the Global South) is to concentrate the intellectual gravitas, the resources and the opportunities into the Global North. The concentration will produce the best science which will trickle methods, theories, and insights down to the Global South. Ten years ago, Nigel Crisp observed, with respect to the healthcare workforce that ‘the global health system is characterised by an import–export business in which rich countries export the ideology of Western scientific medicine and aid predicated on this ideology to poor countries. In return, …
@article{reidpath_problem_2019,
	title = {The problem of ‘trickle-down science’ from the {Global} {North} to the {Global} {South}},
	volume = {4},
	copyright = {© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2019. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.},
	issn = {2059-7908},
	url = {https://gh.bmj.com/content/4/4/e001719},
	doi = {10.1136/bmjgh-2019-001719},
	abstract = {\#\#\# Summary box

Trickle-down economics holds that the way to lift the poor out of poverty is to support wealth creation in those who are already rich.1 The underlying assumption is that as the wealth of the rich grows, they will purchase more goods and services, creating opportunities for the less well-off to benefit. The theory is in direct contrast to one that actively redistributes wealth. The analogy in science is that the way to improve science in the less developed parts of the world (the Global South) is to concentrate the intellectual gravitas, the resources and the opportunities into the Global North. The concentration will produce the best science which will trickle methods, theories, and insights down to the Global South.

Ten years ago, Nigel Crisp observed, with respect to the healthcare workforce that ‘the global health system is characterised by an import–export business in which rich countries export the ideology of Western scientific medicine and aid predicated on this ideology to poor countries. In return, …},
	language = {en},
	number = {4},
	urldate = {2024-08-13},
	journal = {BMJ Global Health},
	author = {Reidpath, Daniel D. and Allotey, Pascale},
	month = jul,
	year = {2019},
	pmid = {31406597},
	note = {Publisher: BMJ Specialist Journals
Section: Commentary},
	keywords = {decolonizing, education policy, globalization, international perspectives, trickle-down},
	pages = {e001719},
}

Downloads: 0