Medieval Jewish Criticism of the Doctrine of Original Sin

Medieval Jewish Criticism of the Doctrine of Original Sin. Rembaum, J. E. AJS Review, 7:353--382, April, 1982.

With the passage of time the notion of original sin became a matter of increasing concern for medieval Jewish critics of Christianity. The foundation of this criticism was laid by the earlier polemical writers, specifically those of the period from the second half of the twelfth through the early fourteenth centuries. The later authors, from the late fourteenth through the mid-seventeenth centuries, incorporated practically all of the arguments raised by their predecessors and added new criticism reflecting their greater familiarity with Christian beliefs and literature. The earlier polemicists, while approaching their task from a rational, “common sense” perspective, relied heavily on Hebrew biblical and, to a lesser degree, New Testament passages. The later writers reflected a greater intellectual independence of scriptural sources. Because the earlier works are generally structured as running commentaries of scriptural texts relevant to Christianity, their treatment of original sin, and other Christian doctrines for that matter, tends to be unfocused.3 The issues that are raised emerge piecemeal as the salient biblical passages are interpreted. The later works tend to be built on discussions of concepts. Consequently, a number of arguments are coalesced into coherent analyses. Such structural differences are the results of different patterns of inquiry. The earlier textually oriented critiques are, on the whole, products of the Franco-German polemical writers.

@article{ rembaum_medieval_1982,
  title = {Medieval {Jewish} {Criticism} of the {Doctrine} of {Original} {Sin}},
  volume = {7},
  issn = {1475-4541},
  url = {http://journals.cambridge.org/article_S0364009400000738},
  doi = {10.1017/S0364009400000738},
  abstract = {With the passage of time the notion of original sin became a matter of increasing concern for medieval Jewish critics of Christianity. The foundation of this criticism was laid by the earlier polemical writers, specifically those of the period from the second half of the twelfth through the early fourteenth centuries. The later authors, from the late fourteenth through the mid-seventeenth centuries, incorporated practically all of the arguments raised by their predecessors and added new criticism reflecting their greater familiarity with Christian beliefs and literature. The earlier polemicists, while approaching their task from a rational, “common sense” perspective, relied heavily on Hebrew biblical and, to a lesser degree, New Testament passages. The later writers reflected a greater intellectual independence of scriptural sources. Because the earlier works are generally structured as running commentaries of scriptural texts relevant to Christianity, their treatment of original sin, and other Christian doctrines for that matter, tends to be unfocused.3 The issues that are raised emerge piecemeal as the salient biblical passages are interpreted. The later works tend to be built on discussions of concepts. Consequently, a number of arguments are coalesced into coherent analyses. Such structural differences are the results of different patterns of inquiry. The earlier textually oriented critiques are, on the whole, products of the Franco-German polemical writers.},
  urldate = {2015-09-26TZ},
  journal = {AJS Review},
  author = {Rembaum, Joel E.},
  month = {April},
  year = {1982},
  pages = {353--382}
}

Downloads: 0

{"_id":"MJQGqkxKN6tWWsZ7b","bibbaseid":"rembaum-medievaljewishcriticismofthedoctrineoforiginalsin-1982","downloads":0,"creationDate":"2015-10-02T11:25:59.719Z","title":"Medieval Jewish Criticism of the Doctrine of Original Sin","author_short":["Rembaum, J.<nbsp>E."],"year":1982,"bibtype":"article","biburl":"http://bibbase.org/zotero/godfuel","bibdata":{"abstract":"With the passage of time the notion of original sin became a matter of increasing concern for medieval Jewish critics of Christianity. The foundation of this criticism was laid by the earlier polemical writers, specifically those of the period from the second half of the twelfth through the early fourteenth centuries. The later authors, from the late fourteenth through the mid-seventeenth centuries, incorporated practically all of the arguments raised by their predecessors and added new criticism reflecting their greater familiarity with Christian beliefs and literature. The earlier polemicists, while approaching their task from a rational, “common sense” perspective, relied heavily on Hebrew biblical and, to a lesser degree, New Testament passages. The later writers reflected a greater intellectual independence of scriptural sources. Because the earlier works are generally structured as running commentaries of scriptural texts relevant to Christianity, their treatment of original sin, and other Christian doctrines for that matter, tends to be unfocused.3 The issues that are raised emerge piecemeal as the salient biblical passages are interpreted. The later works tend to be built on discussions of concepts. Consequently, a number of arguments are coalesced into coherent analyses. Such structural differences are the results of different patterns of inquiry. The earlier textually oriented critiques are, on the whole, products of the Franco-German polemical writers.","author":["Rembaum, Joel E."],"author_short":["Rembaum, J.<nbsp>E."],"bibtex":"@article{ rembaum_medieval_1982,\n title = {Medieval {Jewish} {Criticism} of the {Doctrine} of {Original} {Sin}},\n volume = {7},\n issn = {1475-4541},\n url = {http://journals.cambridge.org/article_S0364009400000738},\n doi = {10.1017/S0364009400000738},\n abstract = {With the passage of time the notion of original sin became a matter of increasing concern for medieval Jewish critics of Christianity. The foundation of this criticism was laid by the earlier polemical writers, specifically those of the period from the second half of the twelfth through the early fourteenth centuries. The later authors, from the late fourteenth through the mid-seventeenth centuries, incorporated practically all of the arguments raised by their predecessors and added new criticism reflecting their greater familiarity with Christian beliefs and literature. The earlier polemicists, while approaching their task from a rational, “common sense” perspective, relied heavily on Hebrew biblical and, to a lesser degree, New Testament passages. The later writers reflected a greater intellectual independence of scriptural sources. Because the earlier works are generally structured as running commentaries of scriptural texts relevant to Christianity, their treatment of original sin, and other Christian doctrines for that matter, tends to be unfocused.3 The issues that are raised emerge piecemeal as the salient biblical passages are interpreted. The later works tend to be built on discussions of concepts. Consequently, a number of arguments are coalesced into coherent analyses. Such structural differences are the results of different patterns of inquiry. The earlier textually oriented critiques are, on the whole, products of the Franco-German polemical writers.},\n urldate = {2015-09-26TZ},\n journal = {AJS Review},\n author = {Rembaum, Joel E.},\n month = {April},\n year = {1982},\n pages = {353--382}\n}","bibtype":"article","doi":"10.1017/S0364009400000738","id":"rembaum_medieval_1982","issn":"1475-4541","journal":"AJS Review","key":"rembaum_medieval_1982","month":"April","pages":"353--382","title":"Medieval Jewish Criticism of the Doctrine of Original Sin","type":"article","url":"http://journals.cambridge.org/article_S0364009400000738","urldate":"2015-09-26TZ","volume":"7","year":"1982","bibbaseid":"rembaum-medievaljewishcriticismofthedoctrineoforiginalsin-1982","role":"author","urls":{"Paper":"http://journals.cambridge.org/article_S0364009400000738"},"downloads":0,"html":""},"search_terms":["medieval","jewish","criticism","doctrine","original","sin","rembaum"],"keywords":[],"authorIDs":[],"dataSources":["A7aHK2QX8jFuEPZsu"]}