The effect of the anode loading and method of MEA fabrication on DMFC performance. Reshetenko, T. V., Kim, H. T., Krewer, U., & Kweon, H. J. In Fuel Cells, volume 7, pages 238–245, 2007.
doi  abstract   bibtex   
The influence of the Pt-Ru anode loading and MEA preparation techniques on direct methanol fuel cell (DMFC) performance is studied. Two different anode catalyst layer preparation techniques are employed. One is the direct coating of anode catalyst ink on a membrane to form a catalyst coated membrane, CCManode, and the other is the coating of the ink on the diffusion layers, which generates a catalyst coated substrate, CCSanode. The power density of a combined CCManode/CCScathode MEA is higher than for a CCSanode/CCScathode MEA. The main difference in the performance is observed in the high current density region, where two-phase flow is present and mass transfer processes govern the performance. The CCManode and CCSanode have different macroscopic structures, while showing the same microscopic morphology. Based on their morphological differences, it is expected that the combination of the CCManode and carbon paper provides the more homogeneous removal of CO2 at high currents. The authors suggest that the application of the CCManode with an optimal anode loading improves anode mass transfer, reduces methanol crossover, and enhances the electrochemical reactions.
@inproceedings{reshetenko_effect_2007,
	title = {The effect of the anode loading and method of {MEA} fabrication on {DMFC} performance},
	volume = {7},
	copyright = {All rights reserved},
	isbn = {1615-6854},
	doi = {10.1002/fuce.200600030},
	abstract = {The influence of the Pt-Ru anode loading and MEA preparation techniques on direct methanol fuel cell (DMFC) performance is studied. Two different anode catalyst layer preparation techniques are employed. One is the direct coating of anode catalyst ink on a membrane to form a catalyst coated membrane, CCManode, and the other is the coating of the ink on the diffusion layers, which generates a catalyst coated substrate, CCSanode. The power density of a combined CCManode/CCScathode MEA is higher than for a CCSanode/CCScathode MEA. The main difference in the performance is observed in the high current density region, where two-phase flow is present and mass transfer processes govern the performance. The CCManode and CCSanode have different macroscopic structures, while showing the same microscopic morphology. Based on their morphological differences, it is expected that the combination of the CCManode and carbon paper provides the more homogeneous removal of CO2 at high currents. The authors suggest that the application of the CCManode with an optimal anode loading improves anode mass transfer, reduces methanol crossover, and enhances the electrochemical reactions.},
	booktitle = {Fuel {Cells}},
	author = {Reshetenko, T. V. and Kim, H. T. and Krewer, U. and Kweon, H. J.},
	year = {2007},
	keywords = {Direct methanol fuel cell, EIS, MEA preparation, Pt-Ru loading},
	pages = {238--245},
}

Downloads: 0