Can Control of Soil Erosion Mitigate Water Pollution by Sediments?. Rickson, R. J. ![Can Control of Soil Erosion Mitigate Water Pollution by Sediments? [link]](https://bibbase.org/img/filetypes/link.svg "link")
Paper doi abstract bibtex The detrimental impact of sediment and associated pollutants on water quality is widely acknowledged, with many watercourses in the UK failing to meet the standard of 'good ecological status'. Catchment sediment budgets show that hill slope erosion processes can be significant sources of waterborne sediment, with rates of erosion likely to increase given predicted future weather patterns. However, linking on-site erosion rates with off-site impacts is complicated because of the limited data on soil erosion rates in the UK and the dynamic nature of the source-pathway-receptor continuum over space and time. Even so, soil erosion control measures are designed to reduce sediment production (source) and mobilisation/transport (pathway) on hill slopes, with consequent mitigation of pollution incidents in watercourses (receptors). The purpose of this paper is to review the scientific evidence of the effectiveness of erosion control measures used in the UK to reduce sediment loads of hill slope origin in watercourses. Although over 73 soil erosion mitigation measures have been identified from the literature, empirical data on erosion control effectiveness are limited. Baseline comparisons for the 18 measures where data do exist reveal erosion control effectiveness is highly variable over time and between study locations. Given the limitations of the evidence base in terms of geographical coverage and duration of monitoring, performance of the different measures cannot be extrapolated to other areas. This uncertainty in effectiveness has implications for implementing erosion/sediment risk reduction policies, where quantified targets are stipulated, as is the case in the EU Freshwater Fish and draft Soil Framework Directives. Also, demonstrating technical effectiveness of erosion control measures alone will not encourage uptake by land managers: quantifying the costs and benefits of adopting erosion mitigation is equally important, but these are uncertain and difficult to express in monetary terms.
@article{ricksonCanControlSoil2013,
title = {Can Control of Soil Erosion Mitigate Water Pollution by Sediments?},
author = {Rickson, R. J.},
date = {2013-06},
journaltitle = {Science of The Total Environment},
issn = {0048-9697},
doi = {10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.05.057},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.05.057},
abstract = {The detrimental impact of sediment and associated pollutants on water quality is widely acknowledged, with many watercourses in the UK failing to meet the standard of 'good ecological status'. Catchment sediment budgets show that hill slope erosion processes can be significant sources of waterborne sediment, with rates of erosion likely to increase given predicted future weather patterns. However, linking on-site erosion rates with off-site impacts is complicated because of the limited data on soil erosion rates in the UK and the dynamic nature of the source-pathway-receptor continuum over space and time. Even so, soil erosion control measures are designed to reduce sediment production (source) and mobilisation/transport (pathway) on hill slopes, with consequent mitigation of pollution incidents in watercourses (receptors).
The purpose of this paper is to review the scientific evidence of the effectiveness of erosion control measures used in the UK to reduce sediment loads of hill slope origin in watercourses. Although over 73 soil erosion mitigation measures have been identified from the literature, empirical data on erosion control effectiveness are limited. Baseline comparisons for the 18 measures where data do exist reveal erosion control effectiveness is highly variable over time and between study locations. Given the limitations of the evidence base in terms of geographical coverage and duration of monitoring, performance of the different measures cannot be extrapolated to other areas.
This uncertainty in effectiveness has implications for implementing erosion/sediment risk reduction policies, where quantified targets are stipulated, as is the case in the EU Freshwater Fish and draft Soil Framework Directives. Also, demonstrating technical effectiveness of erosion control measures alone will not encourage uptake by land managers: quantifying the costs and benefits of adopting erosion mitigation is equally important, but these are uncertain and difficult to express in monetary terms.},
keywords = {*imported-from-citeulike-INRMM,~INRMM-MiD:c-12600411,integration-techniques,mitigation,sediment-transport,sediment-yield,soil-erosion,soil-resources,water-quality,water-resources}
}
Downloads: 0
{"_id":"k9QP8PsnMMCAA5Q5b","bibbaseid":"rickson-cancontrolofsoilerosionmitigatewaterpollutionbysediments","authorIDs":[],"author_short":["Rickson, R. J."],"bibdata":{"bibtype":"article","type":"article","title":"Can Control of Soil Erosion Mitigate Water Pollution by Sediments?","author":[{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Rickson"],"firstnames":["R.","J."],"suffixes":[]}],"date":"2013-06","journaltitle":"Science of The Total Environment","issn":"0048-9697","doi":"10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.05.057","url":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.05.057","abstract":"The detrimental impact of sediment and associated pollutants on water quality is widely acknowledged, with many watercourses in the UK failing to meet the standard of 'good ecological status'. Catchment sediment budgets show that hill slope erosion processes can be significant sources of waterborne sediment, with rates of erosion likely to increase given predicted future weather patterns. However, linking on-site erosion rates with off-site impacts is complicated because of the limited data on soil erosion rates in the UK and the dynamic nature of the source-pathway-receptor continuum over space and time. Even so, soil erosion control measures are designed to reduce sediment production (source) and mobilisation/transport (pathway) on hill slopes, with consequent mitigation of pollution incidents in watercourses (receptors). The purpose of this paper is to review the scientific evidence of the effectiveness of erosion control measures used in the UK to reduce sediment loads of hill slope origin in watercourses. Although over 73 soil erosion mitigation measures have been identified from the literature, empirical data on erosion control effectiveness are limited. Baseline comparisons for the 18 measures where data do exist reveal erosion control effectiveness is highly variable over time and between study locations. Given the limitations of the evidence base in terms of geographical coverage and duration of monitoring, performance of the different measures cannot be extrapolated to other areas. This uncertainty in effectiveness has implications for implementing erosion/sediment risk reduction policies, where quantified targets are stipulated, as is the case in the EU Freshwater Fish and draft Soil Framework Directives. Also, demonstrating technical effectiveness of erosion control measures alone will not encourage uptake by land managers: quantifying the costs and benefits of adopting erosion mitigation is equally important, but these are uncertain and difficult to express in monetary terms.","keywords":"*imported-from-citeulike-INRMM,~INRMM-MiD:c-12600411,integration-techniques,mitigation,sediment-transport,sediment-yield,soil-erosion,soil-resources,water-quality,water-resources","bibtex":"@article{ricksonCanControlSoil2013,\n title = {Can Control of Soil Erosion Mitigate Water Pollution by Sediments?},\n author = {Rickson, R. J.},\n date = {2013-06},\n journaltitle = {Science of The Total Environment},\n issn = {0048-9697},\n doi = {10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.05.057},\n url = {https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.05.057},\n abstract = {The detrimental impact of sediment and associated pollutants on water quality is widely acknowledged, with many watercourses in the UK failing to meet the standard of 'good ecological status'. Catchment sediment budgets show that hill slope erosion processes can be significant sources of waterborne sediment, with rates of erosion likely to increase given predicted future weather patterns. However, linking on-site erosion rates with off-site impacts is complicated because of the limited data on soil erosion rates in the UK and the dynamic nature of the source-pathway-receptor continuum over space and time. Even so, soil erosion control measures are designed to reduce sediment production (source) and mobilisation/transport (pathway) on hill slopes, with consequent mitigation of pollution incidents in watercourses (receptors).\n\nThe purpose of this paper is to review the scientific evidence of the effectiveness of erosion control measures used in the UK to reduce sediment loads of hill slope origin in watercourses. Although over 73 soil erosion mitigation measures have been identified from the literature, empirical data on erosion control effectiveness are limited. Baseline comparisons for the 18 measures where data do exist reveal erosion control effectiveness is highly variable over time and between study locations. Given the limitations of the evidence base in terms of geographical coverage and duration of monitoring, performance of the different measures cannot be extrapolated to other areas.\n\nThis uncertainty in effectiveness has implications for implementing erosion/sediment risk reduction policies, where quantified targets are stipulated, as is the case in the EU Freshwater Fish and draft Soil Framework Directives. Also, demonstrating technical effectiveness of erosion control measures alone will not encourage uptake by land managers: quantifying the costs and benefits of adopting erosion mitigation is equally important, but these are uncertain and difficult to express in monetary terms.},\n keywords = {*imported-from-citeulike-INRMM,~INRMM-MiD:c-12600411,integration-techniques,mitigation,sediment-transport,sediment-yield,soil-erosion,soil-resources,water-quality,water-resources}\n}\n\n","author_short":["Rickson, R. J."],"key":"ricksonCanControlSoil2013","id":"ricksonCanControlSoil2013","bibbaseid":"rickson-cancontrolofsoilerosionmitigatewaterpollutionbysediments","role":"author","urls":{"Paper":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2013.05.057"},"keyword":["*imported-from-citeulike-INRMM","~INRMM-MiD:c-12600411","integration-techniques","mitigation","sediment-transport","sediment-yield","soil-erosion","soil-resources","water-quality","water-resources"],"downloads":0},"bibtype":"article","biburl":"https://tmpfiles.org/dl/58794/INRMM.bib","creationDate":"2020-07-02T22:41:19.587Z","downloads":0,"keywords":["*imported-from-citeulike-inrmm","~inrmm-mid:c-12600411","integration-techniques","mitigation","sediment-transport","sediment-yield","soil-erosion","soil-resources","water-quality","water-resources"],"search_terms":["control","soil","erosion","mitigate","water","pollution","sediments","rickson"],"title":"Can Control of Soil Erosion Mitigate Water Pollution by Sediments?","year":null,"dataSources":["DXuKbcZTirdigFKPF"]}