@article{rini_fake_2017,
	title = {Fake {News} and {Partisan} {Epistemology}},
	volume = {27},
	issn = {1054-6863},
	url = {https://muse-jhu-edu.inshs.bib.cnrs.fr/article/670860},
	abstract = {Did you know that Hillary Clinton sold weapons to ISIS? Or that Mike Pence called Michelle Obama “the most vulgar First Lady we’ve ever had”? No, you didn’t know these things. You couldn’t know them, because these claims are false.1 But many American voters believed them.One of the most distinctive features of the 2016 campaign was the rise of “fake news,” factually false claims circulated on social media, usually via channels of partisan camaraderie. Media analysts and social scientists are still debating what role fake news played in Trump’s victory.2 But whether or not it drove the outcome, fake news certainly affected the choices of some individual voters.Why were people willing to believe easily...},
	language = {en},
	number = {S2},
	journal = {Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal},
	author = {Rini, Regina},
	year = {2017},
	pages = {43--64}
}

{"_id":"kqPYDJAPfjBhyJ8f7","bibbaseid":"rini-fakenewsandpartisanepistemology-2017","authorIDs":[],"author_short":["Rini, R."],"bibdata":{"bibtype":"article","type":"article","title":"Fake News and Partisan Epistemology","volume":"27","issn":"1054-6863","url":"https://muse-jhu-edu.inshs.bib.cnrs.fr/article/670860","abstract":"Did you know that Hillary Clinton sold weapons to ISIS? Or that Mike Pence called Michelle Obama “the most vulgar First Lady we’ve ever had”? No, you didn’t know these things. You couldn’t know them, because these claims are false.1 But many American voters believed them.One of the most distinctive features of the 2016 campaign was the rise of “fake news,” factually false claims circulated on social media, usually via channels of partisan camaraderie. Media analysts and social scientists are still debating what role fake news played in Trump’s victory.2 But whether or not it drove the outcome, fake news certainly affected the choices of some individual voters.Why were people willing to believe easily...","language":"en","number":"S2","journal":"Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal","author":[{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Rini"],"firstnames":["Regina"],"suffixes":[]}],"year":"2017","pages":"43–64","bibtex":"@article{rini_fake_2017,\n\ttitle = {Fake {News} and {Partisan} {Epistemology}},\n\tvolume = {27},\n\tissn = {1054-6863},\n\turl = {https://muse-jhu-edu.inshs.bib.cnrs.fr/article/670860},\n\tabstract = {Did you know that Hillary Clinton sold weapons to ISIS? Or that Mike Pence called Michelle Obama “the most vulgar First Lady we’ve ever had”? No, you didn’t know these things. You couldn’t know them, because these claims are false.1 But many American voters believed them.One of the most distinctive features of the 2016 campaign was the rise of “fake news,” factually false claims circulated on social media, usually via channels of partisan camaraderie. Media analysts and social scientists are still debating what role fake news played in Trump’s victory.2 But whether or not it drove the outcome, fake news certainly affected the choices of some individual voters.Why were people willing to believe easily...},\n\tlanguage = {en},\n\tnumber = {S2},\n\tjournal = {Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal},\n\tauthor = {Rini, Regina},\n\tyear = {2017},\n\tpages = {43--64}\n}\n\n","author_short":["Rini, R."],"key":"rini_fake_2017","id":"rini_fake_2017","bibbaseid":"rini-fakenewsandpartisanepistemology-2017","role":"author","urls":{"Paper":"https://muse-jhu-edu.inshs.bib.cnrs.fr/article/670860"},"downloads":0},"bibtype":"article","biburl":"http://bibbase.org/zotero-group/science_et_ignorance/2114998","creationDate":"2020-04-24T08:42:39.701Z","downloads":0,"keywords":[],"search_terms":["fake","news","partisan","epistemology","rini"],"title":"Fake News and Partisan Epistemology","year":2017,"dataSources":["RztxrSRh6LxCd8bYe"]}