Identifying Supply and Demand Elasticities of Agricultural Commodities: Implications for the US Ethanol Mandate. Roberts, M. J & Schlenker, W. American Economic Review, 103(6):2265–2295, October, 2013. ![Identifying Supply and Demand Elasticities of Agricultural Commodities: Implications for the US Ethanol Mandate [link]](https://bibbase.org/img/filetypes/link.svg "link")
Paper doi abstract bibtex We present a new framework to identify supply elasticities of storable commodities where past shocks are used as exogenous price shifters. In the agricultural context, past yield shocks change inventory levels and futures prices of agricultural commodities. We use our estimated elasticities to evaluate the impact of the 2009 Renewable Fuel Standard on commodity prices, quantities, and food consumers' surplus for the four basic staples: corn, rice, soybeans, and wheat. Prices increase 20 percent if one-third of commodities used to produce ethanol are recycled as feedstock, with a positively skewed 95 percent confidence interval that ranges from 14 to 35 percent.
@article{roberts_identifying_2013,
title = {Identifying {Supply} and {Demand} {Elasticities} of {Agricultural} {Commodities}: {Implications} for the {US} {Ethanol} {Mandate}},
volume = {103},
issn = {0002-8282},
shorttitle = {Identifying {Supply} and {Demand} {Elasticities} of {Agricultural} {Commodities}},
url = {http://pubs.aeaweb.org/doi/10.1257/aer.103.6.2265},
doi = {10.1257/aer.103.6.2265},
abstract = {We present a new framework to identify supply elasticities of storable commodities where past shocks are used as exogenous price shifters. In the agricultural context, past yield shocks change inventory levels and futures prices of agricultural commodities. We use our estimated elasticities to evaluate the impact of the 2009 Renewable Fuel Standard on commodity prices, quantities, and food consumers' surplus for the four basic staples: corn, rice, soybeans, and wheat. Prices increase 20 percent if one-third of commodities used to produce ethanol are recycled as feedstock, with a positively skewed 95 percent confidence interval that ranges from 14 to 35 percent.},
language = {en},
number = {6},
urldate = {2017-09-28},
journal = {American Economic Review},
author = {Roberts, Michael J and Schlenker, Wolfram},
month = oct,
year = {2013},
keywords = {CK, Untagged},
pages = {2265--2295},
}
Downloads: 0
{"_id":"CL7hNj9Q9wqemYCnh","bibbaseid":"roberts-schlenker-identifyingsupplyanddemandelasticitiesofagriculturalcommoditiesimplicationsfortheusethanolmandate-2013","author_short":["Roberts, M. J","Schlenker, W."],"bibdata":{"bibtype":"article","type":"article","title":"Identifying Supply and Demand Elasticities of Agricultural Commodities: Implications for the US Ethanol Mandate","volume":"103","issn":"0002-8282","shorttitle":"Identifying Supply and Demand Elasticities of Agricultural Commodities","url":"http://pubs.aeaweb.org/doi/10.1257/aer.103.6.2265","doi":"10.1257/aer.103.6.2265","abstract":"We present a new framework to identify supply elasticities of storable commodities where past shocks are used as exogenous price shifters. In the agricultural context, past yield shocks change inventory levels and futures prices of agricultural commodities. We use our estimated elasticities to evaluate the impact of the 2009 Renewable Fuel Standard on commodity prices, quantities, and food consumers' surplus for the four basic staples: corn, rice, soybeans, and wheat. Prices increase 20 percent if one-third of commodities used to produce ethanol are recycled as feedstock, with a positively skewed 95 percent confidence interval that ranges from 14 to 35 percent.","language":"en","number":"6","urldate":"2017-09-28","journal":"American Economic Review","author":[{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Roberts"],"firstnames":["Michael","J"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Schlenker"],"firstnames":["Wolfram"],"suffixes":[]}],"month":"October","year":"2013","keywords":"CK, Untagged","pages":"2265–2295","bibtex":"@article{roberts_identifying_2013,\n\ttitle = {Identifying {Supply} and {Demand} {Elasticities} of {Agricultural} {Commodities}: {Implications} for the {US} {Ethanol} {Mandate}},\n\tvolume = {103},\n\tissn = {0002-8282},\n\tshorttitle = {Identifying {Supply} and {Demand} {Elasticities} of {Agricultural} {Commodities}},\n\turl = {http://pubs.aeaweb.org/doi/10.1257/aer.103.6.2265},\n\tdoi = {10.1257/aer.103.6.2265},\n\tabstract = {We present a new framework to identify supply elasticities of storable commodities where past shocks are used as exogenous price shifters. In the agricultural context, past yield shocks change inventory levels and futures prices of agricultural commodities. We use our estimated elasticities to evaluate the impact of the 2009 Renewable Fuel Standard on commodity prices, quantities, and food consumers' surplus for the four basic staples: corn, rice, soybeans, and wheat. Prices increase 20 percent if one-third of commodities used to produce ethanol are recycled as feedstock, with a positively skewed 95 percent confidence interval that ranges from 14 to 35 percent.},\n\tlanguage = {en},\n\tnumber = {6},\n\turldate = {2017-09-28},\n\tjournal = {American Economic Review},\n\tauthor = {Roberts, Michael J and Schlenker, Wolfram},\n\tmonth = oct,\n\tyear = {2013},\n\tkeywords = {CK, Untagged},\n\tpages = {2265--2295},\n}\n\n\n\n","author_short":["Roberts, M. J","Schlenker, W."],"key":"roberts_identifying_2013","id":"roberts_identifying_2013","bibbaseid":"roberts-schlenker-identifyingsupplyanddemandelasticitiesofagriculturalcommoditiesimplicationsfortheusethanolmandate-2013","role":"author","urls":{"Paper":"http://pubs.aeaweb.org/doi/10.1257/aer.103.6.2265"},"keyword":["CK","Untagged"],"metadata":{"authorlinks":{}},"html":""},"bibtype":"article","biburl":"http://bibbase.org/zotero-group/ajello/2099979","dataSources":["EndJaSpcpPJCQnJDH"],"keywords":["ck","untagged"],"search_terms":["identifying","supply","demand","elasticities","agricultural","commodities","implications","ethanol","mandate","roberts","schlenker"],"title":"Identifying Supply and Demand Elasticities of Agricultural Commodities: Implications for the US Ethanol Mandate","year":2013}