In defense of Vasubandhu's approach to episodic phenomenology. Robins, S. K. Australasian Philosophical Review, 1(4):416–419, 2017.
In defense of Vasubandhu's approach to episodic phenomenology [link]Paper  doi  abstract   bibtex   
Ganeri [2018] explores three Buddhist approaches to episodic memory and concludes in favor of Buddhaghosa's attentional account. When comparing it to Vasubandhu's, Ganeri argues that Buddhaghosa's is preferable because it does not over- intellectualize episodic memory. In my commentary, I argue that the intellectualism of Vasubandhu's approach (at least as presented by Ganeri) makes it both a more plausible account of episodic memory and a more successful strategy for addressing the precarious role of the self in this form of memory.
@article{Robins2017,
abstract = {Ganeri [2018] explores three Buddhist approaches to episodic memory and concludes in favor of Buddhaghosa's attentional account. When comparing it to Vasubandhu's, Ganeri argues that Buddhaghosa's is preferable because it does not over- intellectualize episodic memory. In my commentary, I argue that the intellectualism of Vasubandhu's approach (at least as presented by Ganeri) makes it both a more plausible account of episodic memory and a more successful strategy for addressing the precarious role of the self in this form of memory.},
author = {Robins, Sarah K.},
doi = {10.1080/24740500.2017.1411148},
file = {:Users/michaelk/Library/Application Support/Mendeley Desktop/Downloaded/Robins - 2017 - In defense of Vasubandhu's approach to episodic phenomenology.pdf:pdf},
issn = {2474-0500},
journal = {Australasian Philosophical Review},
number = {4},
pages = {416--419},
title = {{In defense of Vasubandhu's approach to episodic phenomenology}},
url = {http://www.tandfonline.com/action/journalInformation?journalCode=rapr20 https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/24740500.2017.1411148},
volume = {1},
year = {2017}
}

Downloads: 0