POWER LEARNING OR PATH DEPENDENCY? INVESTIGATING THE ROOTS OF THE EUROPEAN FOOD SAFETY AUTHORITY. ROEDERER-RYNNING, C. & DAUGBJERG, C. Public Administration, 88(2):315--330, 2010.
POWER LEARNING OR PATH DEPENDENCY? INVESTIGATING THE ROOTS OF THE EUROPEAN FOOD SAFETY AUTHORITY [link]Paper  doi  abstract   bibtex   
A key motive for establishing the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) was restoring public confidence in the wake of multiplying food scares and the BSE crisis. Scholars, however, have paid little attention to the actual political and institutional logics that shaped this new organization. This article explores the dynamics underpinning the making of EFSA. We examine the way in which learning and power shaped its organizational architecture. It is demonstrated that the lessons drawn from the past and other models converged on the need to delegate authority to an external agency, but diverged on its mandate, concretely whether or not EFSA should assume risk management responsibilities. In this situation of competitive learning, power and procedural politics conditioned the mandate granted to EFSA. The European Commission, the European Parliament and the European Council shared a common interest in preventing the delegation of regulatory powers to an independent EU agency in food safety policy.
@article{roederer-rynning_power_2010,
	title = {{POWER} {LEARNING} {OR} {PATH} {DEPENDENCY}? {INVESTIGATING} {THE} {ROOTS} {OF} {THE} {EUROPEAN} {FOOD} {SAFETY} {AUTHORITY}},
	volume = {88},
	shorttitle = {{POWER} {LEARNING} {OR} {PATH} {DEPENDENCY}?},
	url = {http://dx.doi.org.proxy.lib.sfu.ca/10.1111/j.1467-9299.2010.01832.x},
	doi = {10.1111/j.1467-9299.2010.01832.x},
	abstract = {A key motive for establishing the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) was restoring public confidence in the wake of multiplying food scares and the BSE crisis. Scholars, however, have paid little attention to the actual political and institutional logics that shaped this new organization. This article explores the dynamics underpinning the making of EFSA. We examine the way in which learning and power shaped its organizational architecture. It is demonstrated that the lessons drawn from the past and other models converged on the need to delegate authority to an external agency, but diverged on its mandate, concretely whether or not EFSA should assume risk management responsibilities. In this situation of competitive learning, power and procedural politics conditioned the mandate granted to EFSA. The European Commission, the European Parliament and the European Council shared a common interest in preventing the delegation of regulatory powers to an independent EU agency in food safety policy.},
	number = {2},
	urldate = {2010-06-12},
	journal = {Public Administration},
	author = {ROEDERER-RYNNING, CHRISTILLA and DAUGBJERG, CARSTEN},
	year = {2010},
	pages = {315--330},
	file = {fulltext(21.pdf:files/35771/fulltext(21.pdf:application/pdf;Wiley Interscience PDF:files/31666/ROEDERER-RYNNING and DAUGBJERG - 2010 - POWER LEARNING OR PATH DEPENDENCY INVESTIGATING T.pdf:application/pdf}
}

Downloads: 0