Condition B effects in two simple steps. Roelofsen, F. Natural Language Semantics, 18(2):115–140, 2010.
Condition B effects in two simple steps [link]Paper  doi  abstract   bibtex   4 downloads  
This paper is concerned with constraints on the interpretation of pronominal anaphora, in particular Condition B effects. It aims to contribute to a particular approach, initiated by Reinhart (Anaphora and semantic interpretation, 1983) and further developed elsewhere. It proposes a modification of Reinhart's Interface Rule, and argues that the resulting theory compares favorably with others, while being compatible with independently motivated general hypotheses about the interaction between different interpretive mechanisms.
@article{Roelofsen:10nals,
	Abstract = {This paper is concerned with constraints on the interpretation of pronominal anaphora, in particular Condition B effects. It aims to contribute to a particular approach, initiated by Reinhart (Anaphora and semantic interpretation, 1983) and further developed elsewhere. It proposes a modification of Reinhart's Interface Rule, and argues that the resulting theory compares favorably with others, while being compatible with independently motivated general hypotheses about the interaction between different interpretive mechanisms.},
	Author = {Roelofsen, Floris},
	Date-Modified = {2019-05-08 16:47:19 +0200},
	Doi = {10.1007/s11050-009-9049-3},
	Journal = {Natural Language Semantics},
	Keywords = {theoretical linguistics,anaphora},
	Mendeley-Tags = {theoretical linguistics},
	Number = {2},
	Pages = {115--140},
	Title = {{Condition B effects in two simple steps}},
	Url = {https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11050-009-9049-3},
	Volume = {18},
	Year = {2010},
	Bdsk-Url-1 = {https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11050-009-9049-3},
	Bdsk-Url-2 = {https://doi.org/10.1007/s11050-009-9049-3}}

Downloads: 4