Effect of aerosol size distribution changes on AOD, CCN and cloud droplet concentration: Case studies from Erfurt and Melpitz, Germany. Romakkaniemi, S., Arola, A., Kokkola, H., Birmili, W., Tuch, T., Kerminen, V., M., Räisänen, P., Smith, J., N., Korhonen, H., & Laaksonen, A. Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres, 117(7):n/a-n/a, 4, 2012. ![Effect of aerosol size distribution changes on AOD, CCN and cloud droplet concentration: Case studies from Erfurt and Melpitz, Germany [link]](https://bibbase.org/img/filetypes/link.svg "link")
Website doi abstract bibtex For the period of 1990 to 2000, atmospheric particulate mass concentrations have decreased in Central Europe. Simultaneously, the amount of shortwave radiation reaching the ground increased during clear sky conditions. The aerosol indirect effect has not been seen as clearly, as the radiation reaching the ground during overcast conditions has not increased as much as might be expected. Here we show that this may be caused by the condensation kinetics of water during cloud droplet formation. The decrease in the particulate mass led to a clear decrease in the number concentration of cloud condensation nuclei (CCN). However, in urban areas a relatively larger decrease in the number of particles in the upper end of the accumulation mode has led to slower condensation of water. As a result, a higher maximum supersaturation is reached during the cloud droplet formation. This compensates for the effect of decreased CCN concentrations. For example in Erfurt between 1991 and 1996, the aerosol properties changed so that aerosol optical depth decreased by 58% and CCN concentration decreased by 25 to 50%. These led to a 4 to 12% reduction in cloud droplet number concentration (CDNC) and less than a 2 Wm-2 increase in shortwave radiation during overcast conditions. These results demonstrate that locally the aerosol direct effect can be much larger than the aerosol indirect effect. Furthermore, even though AOD appears to be a valid proxy for CCN, the correlation between AOD and CDNC is not straightforward and thus AOD cannot be used as a proxy for CDNC.
@article{
title = {Effect of aerosol size distribution changes on AOD, CCN and cloud droplet concentration: Case studies from Erfurt and Melpitz, Germany},
type = {article},
year = {2012},
pages = {n/a-n/a},
volume = {117},
websites = {http://doi.wiley.com/10.1029/2011JD017091},
month = {4},
day = {16},
id = {fa1ba26b-ae0a-3127-94d0-22d6d41871f3},
created = {2023-01-31T22:46:16.428Z},
file_attached = {false},
profile_id = {2e2b0bf1-6573-3fd8-8628-55d1dc39fe31},
last_modified = {2023-01-31T22:46:16.428Z},
read = {false},
starred = {false},
authored = {true},
confirmed = {true},
hidden = {false},
citation_key = {Romakkaniemi2012},
source_type = {Journal Article},
private_publication = {false},
abstract = {For the period of 1990 to 2000, atmospheric particulate mass concentrations have decreased in Central Europe. Simultaneously, the amount of shortwave radiation reaching the ground increased during clear sky conditions. The aerosol indirect effect has not been seen as clearly, as the radiation reaching the ground during overcast conditions has not increased as much as might be expected. Here we show that this may be caused by the condensation kinetics of water during cloud droplet formation. The decrease in the particulate mass led to a clear decrease in the number concentration of cloud condensation nuclei (CCN). However, in urban areas a relatively larger decrease in the number of particles in the upper end of the accumulation mode has led to slower condensation of water. As a result, a higher maximum supersaturation is reached during the cloud droplet formation. This compensates for the effect of decreased CCN concentrations. For example in Erfurt between 1991 and 1996, the aerosol properties changed so that aerosol optical depth decreased by 58% and CCN concentration decreased by 25 to 50%. These led to a 4 to 12% reduction in cloud droplet number concentration (CDNC) and less than a 2 Wm<sup>-2</sup> increase in shortwave radiation during overcast conditions. These results demonstrate that locally the aerosol direct effect can be much larger than the aerosol indirect effect. Furthermore, even though AOD appears to be a valid proxy for CCN, the correlation between AOD and CDNC is not straightforward and thus AOD cannot be used as a proxy for CDNC.},
bibtype = {article},
author = {Romakkaniemi, S. and Arola, A. and Kokkola, H. and Birmili, W. and Tuch, T. and Kerminen, V.-M. M. and Räisänen, P. and Smith, J. N. and Korhonen, H. and Laaksonen, A.},
doi = {10.1029/2011JD017091},
journal = {Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres},
number = {7}
}
Downloads: 0
{"_id":"sevip923Hz6aJuRfB","bibbaseid":"romakkaniemi-arola-kokkola-birmili-tuch-kerminen-risnen-smith-etal-effectofaerosolsizedistributionchangesonaodccnandclouddropletconcentrationcasestudiesfromerfurtandmelpitzgermany-2012","downloads":0,"creationDate":"2018-01-01T22:12:09.233Z","title":"Effect of aerosol size distribution changes on AOD, CCN and cloud droplet concentration: Case studies from Erfurt and Melpitz, Germany","author_short":["Romakkaniemi, S.","Arola, A.","Kokkola, H.","Birmili, W.","Tuch, T.","Kerminen, V., M.","Räisänen, P.","Smith, J., N.","Korhonen, H.","Laaksonen, A."],"year":2012,"bibtype":"article","biburl":"https://bibbase.org/service/mendeley/2e2b0bf1-6573-3fd8-8628-55d1dc39fe31","bibdata":{"title":"Effect of aerosol size distribution changes on AOD, CCN and cloud droplet concentration: Case studies from Erfurt and Melpitz, Germany","type":"article","year":"2012","pages":"n/a-n/a","volume":"117","websites":"http://doi.wiley.com/10.1029/2011JD017091","month":"4","day":"16","id":"fa1ba26b-ae0a-3127-94d0-22d6d41871f3","created":"2023-01-31T22:46:16.428Z","file_attached":false,"profile_id":"2e2b0bf1-6573-3fd8-8628-55d1dc39fe31","last_modified":"2023-01-31T22:46:16.428Z","read":false,"starred":false,"authored":"true","confirmed":"true","hidden":false,"citation_key":"Romakkaniemi2012","source_type":"Journal Article","private_publication":false,"abstract":"For the period of 1990 to 2000, atmospheric particulate mass concentrations have decreased in Central Europe. Simultaneously, the amount of shortwave radiation reaching the ground increased during clear sky conditions. The aerosol indirect effect has not been seen as clearly, as the radiation reaching the ground during overcast conditions has not increased as much as might be expected. Here we show that this may be caused by the condensation kinetics of water during cloud droplet formation. The decrease in the particulate mass led to a clear decrease in the number concentration of cloud condensation nuclei (CCN). However, in urban areas a relatively larger decrease in the number of particles in the upper end of the accumulation mode has led to slower condensation of water. As a result, a higher maximum supersaturation is reached during the cloud droplet formation. This compensates for the effect of decreased CCN concentrations. For example in Erfurt between 1991 and 1996, the aerosol properties changed so that aerosol optical depth decreased by 58% and CCN concentration decreased by 25 to 50%. These led to a 4 to 12% reduction in cloud droplet number concentration (CDNC) and less than a 2 Wm<sup>-2</sup> increase in shortwave radiation during overcast conditions. These results demonstrate that locally the aerosol direct effect can be much larger than the aerosol indirect effect. Furthermore, even though AOD appears to be a valid proxy for CCN, the correlation between AOD and CDNC is not straightforward and thus AOD cannot be used as a proxy for CDNC.","bibtype":"article","author":"Romakkaniemi, S. and Arola, A. and Kokkola, H. and Birmili, W. and Tuch, T. and Kerminen, V.-M. M. and Räisänen, P. and Smith, J. N. and Korhonen, H. and Laaksonen, A.","doi":"10.1029/2011JD017091","journal":"Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres","number":"7","bibtex":"@article{\n title = {Effect of aerosol size distribution changes on AOD, CCN and cloud droplet concentration: Case studies from Erfurt and Melpitz, Germany},\n type = {article},\n year = {2012},\n pages = {n/a-n/a},\n volume = {117},\n websites = {http://doi.wiley.com/10.1029/2011JD017091},\n month = {4},\n day = {16},\n id = {fa1ba26b-ae0a-3127-94d0-22d6d41871f3},\n created = {2023-01-31T22:46:16.428Z},\n file_attached = {false},\n profile_id = {2e2b0bf1-6573-3fd8-8628-55d1dc39fe31},\n last_modified = {2023-01-31T22:46:16.428Z},\n read = {false},\n starred = {false},\n authored = {true},\n confirmed = {true},\n hidden = {false},\n citation_key = {Romakkaniemi2012},\n source_type = {Journal Article},\n private_publication = {false},\n abstract = {For the period of 1990 to 2000, atmospheric particulate mass concentrations have decreased in Central Europe. Simultaneously, the amount of shortwave radiation reaching the ground increased during clear sky conditions. The aerosol indirect effect has not been seen as clearly, as the radiation reaching the ground during overcast conditions has not increased as much as might be expected. Here we show that this may be caused by the condensation kinetics of water during cloud droplet formation. The decrease in the particulate mass led to a clear decrease in the number concentration of cloud condensation nuclei (CCN). However, in urban areas a relatively larger decrease in the number of particles in the upper end of the accumulation mode has led to slower condensation of water. As a result, a higher maximum supersaturation is reached during the cloud droplet formation. This compensates for the effect of decreased CCN concentrations. For example in Erfurt between 1991 and 1996, the aerosol properties changed so that aerosol optical depth decreased by 58% and CCN concentration decreased by 25 to 50%. These led to a 4 to 12% reduction in cloud droplet number concentration (CDNC) and less than a 2 Wm<sup>-2</sup> increase in shortwave radiation during overcast conditions. These results demonstrate that locally the aerosol direct effect can be much larger than the aerosol indirect effect. Furthermore, even though AOD appears to be a valid proxy for CCN, the correlation between AOD and CDNC is not straightforward and thus AOD cannot be used as a proxy for CDNC.},\n bibtype = {article},\n author = {Romakkaniemi, S. and Arola, A. and Kokkola, H. and Birmili, W. and Tuch, T. and Kerminen, V.-M. M. and Räisänen, P. and Smith, J. N. and Korhonen, H. and Laaksonen, A.},\n doi = {10.1029/2011JD017091},\n journal = {Journal of Geophysical Research Atmospheres},\n number = {7}\n}","author_short":["Romakkaniemi, S.","Arola, A.","Kokkola, H.","Birmili, W.","Tuch, T.","Kerminen, V., M.","Räisänen, P.","Smith, J., N.","Korhonen, H.","Laaksonen, A."],"urls":{"Website":"http://doi.wiley.com/10.1029/2011JD017091"},"biburl":"https://bibbase.org/service/mendeley/2e2b0bf1-6573-3fd8-8628-55d1dc39fe31","bibbaseid":"romakkaniemi-arola-kokkola-birmili-tuch-kerminen-risnen-smith-etal-effectofaerosolsizedistributionchangesonaodccnandclouddropletconcentrationcasestudiesfromerfurtandmelpitzgermany-2012","role":"author","metadata":{"authorlinks":{"smith, j":"https://bibbase.org/service/mendeley/2e2b0bf1-6573-3fd8-8628-55d1dc39fe31"}},"downloads":0},"search_terms":["effect","aerosol","size","distribution","changes","aod","ccn","cloud","droplet","concentration","case","studies","erfurt","melpitz","germany","romakkaniemi","arola","kokkola","birmili","tuch","kerminen","räisänen","smith","korhonen","laaksonen"],"keywords":[],"authorIDs":["5a4ab23928adc05f5a00000f","5de7c32dbc280fdf01000288","5deedbc766e59ade010000a8","5def0af3c5ae39f201000068","5def36c4e83f7dde01000128","5def83ba45114dde010000c0","5df0e67345b054df01000083","5df58e3d428212df0100003d","5df7a75df3cb28df0100014c","5dfa22de1c2129de01000068","5dfc9986a865a4de010000e3","5e02b66a19da8edf0100003b","5e02dc81410ebcdf01000070","5e03254ba1630edf0100002a","MSQsEfrmvtM2Q27E4"],"dataSources":["Ep2dxDhQKqfH8f6Aq","ya2CyA73rpZseyrZ8","WeLWzjCfqFYg2Sxnm","2252seNhipfTmjEBQ"]}