Coordinating compliance incentives. Root, V. Cornell Law Review, 102(4):1003-1086, 2017. Website abstract bibtex Market power is the most important determinant of liability in competition law cases throughout the world. Yet fundamental questions on the relevance of market power are underanalyzed, if examined at all: When and why should we inquire into market power? How much should we require? Should market power be viewed as one thing, regardless of the practice under scrutiny and independent of the pertinent anticompetitive and procompetitive explanations for its use? Does each component of market power have the same probative force? Or even influence optimal liability determinations in the same direction? This Article's ground-up investigation of market power finds that the answers often differ from what is generally believed and sometimes are surprising — notably, higher levels of certain market power measures or particular market power components sometimes disfavor liability. This gulf between conventional wisdom and correct understanding suggests the need to redirect research agendas, agency guidance, and competition law doctrine. Forthcoming, Harvard Law Review (March 2017) JEL Codes: D42, K21, L12, L40 Economics, and Business for financial support. My thinking on this subject has evolved while conducting research on this project; much presented here departs from views expressed in my prior writing. Disclaimer: I occasionally consult on antitrust cases, and my spouse is in the legal department of a financial services firm.
@article{
title = {Coordinating compliance incentives},
type = {article},
year = {2017},
identifiers = {[object Object]},
pages = {1003-1086},
volume = {102},
websites = {http://harvardlpr.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/Stemen.pdf},
id = {18b3269f-5adf-3782-8083-af97c2a2167b},
created = {2017-11-10T18:19:03.404Z},
file_attached = {false},
profile_id = {38c6dbcb-2394-3f18-9217-58d777c08c69},
group_id = {d9389c6c-8ab5-3b8b-86ed-33db09ca0198},
last_modified = {2018-05-22T22:14:28.881Z},
tags = {OA},
read = {false},
starred = {false},
authored = {false},
confirmed = {true},
hidden = {false},
citation_key = {DStemen2017},
private_publication = {false},
abstract = {Market power is the most important determinant of liability in competition law cases throughout the world. Yet fundamental questions on the relevance of market power are underanalyzed, if examined at all: When and why should we inquire into market power? How much should we require? Should market power be viewed as one thing, regardless of the practice under scrutiny and independent of the pertinent anticompetitive and procompetitive explanations for its use? Does each component of market power have the same probative force? Or even influence optimal liability determinations in the same direction? This Article's ground-up investigation of market power finds that the answers often differ from what is generally believed and sometimes are surprising — notably, higher levels of certain market power measures or particular market power components sometimes disfavor liability. This gulf between conventional wisdom and correct understanding suggests the need to redirect research agendas, agency guidance, and competition law doctrine. Forthcoming, Harvard Law Review (March 2017) JEL Codes: D42, K21, L12, L40 Economics, and Business for financial support. My thinking on this subject has evolved while conducting research on this project; much presented here departs from views expressed in my prior writing. Disclaimer: I occasionally consult on antitrust cases, and my spouse is in the legal department of a financial services firm.},
bibtype = {article},
author = {Root, Veronica},
journal = {Cornell Law Review},
number = {4}
}
Downloads: 0
{"_id":"PmKrCpkxSawv3tBAB","bibbaseid":"root-coordinatingcomplianceincentives-2017","downloads":0,"creationDate":"2018-07-20T08:07:38.095Z","title":"Coordinating compliance incentives","author_short":["Root, V."],"year":2017,"bibtype":"article","biburl":null,"bibdata":{"title":"Coordinating compliance incentives","type":"article","year":"2017","identifiers":"[object Object]","pages":"1003-1086","volume":"102","websites":"http://harvardlpr.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/Stemen.pdf","id":"18b3269f-5adf-3782-8083-af97c2a2167b","created":"2017-11-10T18:19:03.404Z","file_attached":false,"profile_id":"38c6dbcb-2394-3f18-9217-58d777c08c69","group_id":"d9389c6c-8ab5-3b8b-86ed-33db09ca0198","last_modified":"2018-05-22T22:14:28.881Z","tags":"OA","read":false,"starred":false,"authored":false,"confirmed":"true","hidden":false,"citation_key":"DStemen2017","private_publication":false,"abstract":"Market power is the most important determinant of liability in competition law cases throughout the world. Yet fundamental questions on the relevance of market power are underanalyzed, if examined at all: When and why should we inquire into market power? How much should we require? Should market power be viewed as one thing, regardless of the practice under scrutiny and independent of the pertinent anticompetitive and procompetitive explanations for its use? Does each component of market power have the same probative force? Or even influence optimal liability determinations in the same direction? This Article's ground-up investigation of market power finds that the answers often differ from what is generally believed and sometimes are surprising — notably, higher levels of certain market power measures or particular market power components sometimes disfavor liability. This gulf between conventional wisdom and correct understanding suggests the need to redirect research agendas, agency guidance, and competition law doctrine. Forthcoming, Harvard Law Review (March 2017) JEL Codes: D42, K21, L12, L40 Economics, and Business for financial support. My thinking on this subject has evolved while conducting research on this project; much presented here departs from views expressed in my prior writing. Disclaimer: I occasionally consult on antitrust cases, and my spouse is in the legal department of a financial services firm.","bibtype":"article","author":"Root, Veronica","journal":"Cornell Law Review","number":"4","bibtex":"@article{\n title = {Coordinating compliance incentives},\n type = {article},\n year = {2017},\n identifiers = {[object Object]},\n pages = {1003-1086},\n volume = {102},\n websites = {http://harvardlpr.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/Stemen.pdf},\n id = {18b3269f-5adf-3782-8083-af97c2a2167b},\n created = {2017-11-10T18:19:03.404Z},\n file_attached = {false},\n profile_id = {38c6dbcb-2394-3f18-9217-58d777c08c69},\n group_id = {d9389c6c-8ab5-3b8b-86ed-33db09ca0198},\n last_modified = {2018-05-22T22:14:28.881Z},\n tags = {OA},\n read = {false},\n starred = {false},\n authored = {false},\n confirmed = {true},\n hidden = {false},\n citation_key = {DStemen2017},\n private_publication = {false},\n abstract = {Market power is the most important determinant of liability in competition law cases throughout the world. Yet fundamental questions on the relevance of market power are underanalyzed, if examined at all: When and why should we inquire into market power? How much should we require? Should market power be viewed as one thing, regardless of the practice under scrutiny and independent of the pertinent anticompetitive and procompetitive explanations for its use? Does each component of market power have the same probative force? Or even influence optimal liability determinations in the same direction? This Article's ground-up investigation of market power finds that the answers often differ from what is generally believed and sometimes are surprising — notably, higher levels of certain market power measures or particular market power components sometimes disfavor liability. This gulf between conventional wisdom and correct understanding suggests the need to redirect research agendas, agency guidance, and competition law doctrine. Forthcoming, Harvard Law Review (March 2017) JEL Codes: D42, K21, L12, L40 Economics, and Business for financial support. My thinking on this subject has evolved while conducting research on this project; much presented here departs from views expressed in my prior writing. Disclaimer: I occasionally consult on antitrust cases, and my spouse is in the legal department of a financial services firm.},\n bibtype = {article},\n author = {Root, Veronica},\n journal = {Cornell Law Review},\n number = {4}\n}","author_short":["Root, V."],"urls":{"Website":"http://harvardlpr.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/07/Stemen.pdf"},"bibbaseid":"root-coordinatingcomplianceincentives-2017","role":"author","downloads":0},"search_terms":["coordinating","compliance","incentives","root"],"keywords":[],"authorIDs":[]}