A theory of focus interpretation. Rooth, M. Natural Language Semantics, 1(1):75–116, 1992.
Paper doi abstract bibtex According to the alternative semantics for focus, the semantic reflec of intonational focus is a second semantic value, which in the case of a sentence is a set of propositions. We examine a range of semantic and pragmatic applications of the theory, and extract a unitary principle specifying how the focus semantic value interacts with semantic and pragmatic processes. A strong version of the theory has the effect of making lexical or construction-specific stipulation of a focus-related effect in association-with-focus constructions impossible. Furthermore, while focus has a uniform import, the sources of meaning differences in association with focus are various.
@article{rooth_theory_1992,
title = {A theory of focus interpretation},
volume = {1},
issn = {1572-865X},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02342617},
doi = {10.1007/BF02342617},
abstract = {According to the alternative semantics for focus, the semantic reflec of intonational focus is a second semantic value, which in the case of a sentence is a set of propositions. We examine a range of semantic and pragmatic applications of the theory, and extract a unitary principle specifying how the focus semantic value interacts with semantic and pragmatic processes. A strong version of the theory has the effect of making lexical or construction-specific stipulation of a focus-related effect in association-with-focus constructions impossible. Furthermore, while focus has a uniform import, the sources of meaning differences in association with focus are various.},
language = {en},
number = {1},
urldate = {2025-03-16},
journal = {Natural Language Semantics},
author = {Rooth, Mats},
year = {1992},
keywords = {Alternative Semantic, Focus Interpretation, Meaning Difference, Pragmatic Process, Strong Version, even-like particles, only},
pages = {75--116},
}
Downloads: 0
{"_id":"sE8Deq28QuCF9jeYK","bibbaseid":"rooth-atheoryoffocusinterpretation-1992","downloads":0,"creationDate":"2016-06-29T19:16:09.092Z","title":"A theory of focus interpretation","author_short":["Rooth, M."],"year":1992,"bibtype":"article","biburl":"https://bibbase.org/zotero/spistoiareda","bibdata":{"bibtype":"article","type":"article","title":"A theory of focus interpretation","volume":"1","issn":"1572-865X","url":"https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02342617","doi":"10.1007/BF02342617","abstract":"According to the alternative semantics for focus, the semantic reflec of intonational focus is a second semantic value, which in the case of a sentence is a set of propositions. We examine a range of semantic and pragmatic applications of the theory, and extract a unitary principle specifying how the focus semantic value interacts with semantic and pragmatic processes. A strong version of the theory has the effect of making lexical or construction-specific stipulation of a focus-related effect in association-with-focus constructions impossible. Furthermore, while focus has a uniform import, the sources of meaning differences in association with focus are various.","language":"en","number":"1","urldate":"2025-03-16","journal":"Natural Language Semantics","author":[{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Rooth"],"firstnames":["Mats"],"suffixes":[]}],"year":"1992","keywords":"Alternative Semantic, Focus Interpretation, Meaning Difference, Pragmatic Process, Strong Version, even-like particles, only","pages":"75–116","bibtex":"@article{rooth_theory_1992,\n\ttitle = {A theory of focus interpretation},\n\tvolume = {1},\n\tissn = {1572-865X},\n\turl = {https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02342617},\n\tdoi = {10.1007/BF02342617},\n\tabstract = {According to the alternative semantics for focus, the semantic reflec of intonational focus is a second semantic value, which in the case of a sentence is a set of propositions. We examine a range of semantic and pragmatic applications of the theory, and extract a unitary principle specifying how the focus semantic value interacts with semantic and pragmatic processes. A strong version of the theory has the effect of making lexical or construction-specific stipulation of a focus-related effect in association-with-focus constructions impossible. Furthermore, while focus has a uniform import, the sources of meaning differences in association with focus are various.},\n\tlanguage = {en},\n\tnumber = {1},\n\turldate = {2025-03-16},\n\tjournal = {Natural Language Semantics},\n\tauthor = {Rooth, Mats},\n\tyear = {1992},\n\tkeywords = {Alternative Semantic, Focus Interpretation, Meaning Difference, Pragmatic Process, Strong Version, even-like particles, only},\n\tpages = {75--116},\n}\n\n\n\n","author_short":["Rooth, M."],"key":"rooth_theory_1992","id":"rooth_theory_1992","bibbaseid":"rooth-atheoryoffocusinterpretation-1992","role":"author","urls":{"Paper":"https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02342617"},"keyword":["Alternative Semantic","Focus Interpretation","Meaning Difference","Pragmatic Process","Strong Version","even-like particles","only"],"metadata":{"authorlinks":{}},"downloads":0},"search_terms":["theory","focus","interpretation","rooth"],"keywords":["alternative semantic","focus interpretation","meaning difference","pragmatic process","strong version","even-like particles","only"],"authorIDs":[],"dataSources":["QgBQKKHbKbBbG3pi5","ZCvfhoPJsvp6TqwWi","9Y3aY84prc5nLGGNn","DGADNcDKaoqbt4RLh","bommY2NHyR8XfBCJf","N5KtS7cqCLGAjBLSh"]}