The ignorance behind inconsistency toleration. Rosario Martínez-Ordaz, M. d. Synthese, March, 2020.
Paper doi abstract bibtex Inconsistency toleration is the phenomenon of working with inconsistent information without threatening one’s rationality. Here I address the role that ignorance plays for the tolerance of contradictions in the empirical sciences. In particular, I contend that there are two types of ignorance that, when present, can make epistemic agents to be rationally inclined to tolerate a contradiction. The first is factual ignorance, understood as temporary undecidability of the truth values of the conflicting propositions. The second is what I call “ignorance of theoretical structure”, which is lack of knowledge of relevant inference patterns within a specific theory. I argue that these two types of ignorance can be explanatory of the scientists’ rational disposition to be tolerant towards contradictions, and I illustrate this with a case study from neutrino physics.
@article{rosario_martinez-ordaz_ignorance_2020,
title = {The ignorance behind inconsistency toleration},
issn = {1573-0964},
url = {https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-020-02593-4},
doi = {10.1007/s11229-020-02593-4},
abstract = {Inconsistency toleration is the phenomenon of working with inconsistent information without threatening one’s rationality. Here I address the role that ignorance plays for the tolerance of contradictions in the empirical sciences. In particular, I contend that there are two types of ignorance that, when present, can make epistemic agents to be rationally inclined to tolerate a contradiction. The first is factual ignorance, understood as temporary undecidability of the truth values of the conflicting propositions. The second is what I call “ignorance of theoretical structure”, which is lack of knowledge of relevant inference patterns within a specific theory. I argue that these two types of ignorance can be explanatory of the scientists’ rational disposition to be tolerant towards contradictions, and I illustrate this with a case study from neutrino physics.},
language = {en},
urldate = {2020-10-29},
journal = {Synthese},
author = {Rosario Martínez-Ordaz, María del},
month = mar,
year = {2020},
}
Downloads: 0
{"_id":"ma5gQxzT6v6iJNPzJ","bibbaseid":"rosariomartnezordaz-theignorancebehindinconsistencytoleration-2020","author_short":["Rosario Martínez-Ordaz, M. d."],"bibdata":{"bibtype":"article","type":"article","title":"The ignorance behind inconsistency toleration","issn":"1573-0964","url":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-020-02593-4","doi":"10.1007/s11229-020-02593-4","abstract":"Inconsistency toleration is the phenomenon of working with inconsistent information without threatening one’s rationality. Here I address the role that ignorance plays for the tolerance of contradictions in the empirical sciences. In particular, I contend that there are two types of ignorance that, when present, can make epistemic agents to be rationally inclined to tolerate a contradiction. The first is factual ignorance, understood as temporary undecidability of the truth values of the conflicting propositions. The second is what I call “ignorance of theoretical structure”, which is lack of knowledge of relevant inference patterns within a specific theory. I argue that these two types of ignorance can be explanatory of the scientists’ rational disposition to be tolerant towards contradictions, and I illustrate this with a case study from neutrino physics.","language":"en","urldate":"2020-10-29","journal":"Synthese","author":[{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Rosario","Martínez-Ordaz"],"firstnames":["María","del"],"suffixes":[]}],"month":"March","year":"2020","bibtex":"@article{rosario_martinez-ordaz_ignorance_2020,\n\ttitle = {The ignorance behind inconsistency toleration},\n\tissn = {1573-0964},\n\turl = {https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-020-02593-4},\n\tdoi = {10.1007/s11229-020-02593-4},\n\tabstract = {Inconsistency toleration is the phenomenon of working with inconsistent information without threatening one’s rationality. Here I address the role that ignorance plays for the tolerance of contradictions in the empirical sciences. In particular, I contend that there are two types of ignorance that, when present, can make epistemic agents to be rationally inclined to tolerate a contradiction. The first is factual ignorance, understood as temporary undecidability of the truth values of the conflicting propositions. The second is what I call “ignorance of theoretical structure”, which is lack of knowledge of relevant inference patterns within a specific theory. I argue that these two types of ignorance can be explanatory of the scientists’ rational disposition to be tolerant towards contradictions, and I illustrate this with a case study from neutrino physics.},\n\tlanguage = {en},\n\turldate = {2020-10-29},\n\tjournal = {Synthese},\n\tauthor = {Rosario Martínez-Ordaz, María del},\n\tmonth = mar,\n\tyear = {2020},\n}\n\n\n\n","author_short":["Rosario Martínez-Ordaz, M. d."],"key":"rosario_martinez-ordaz_ignorance_2020","id":"rosario_martinez-ordaz_ignorance_2020","bibbaseid":"rosariomartnezordaz-theignorancebehindinconsistencytoleration-2020","role":"author","urls":{"Paper":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-020-02593-4"},"metadata":{"authorlinks":{}}},"bibtype":"article","biburl":"http://bibbase.org/zotero-group/science_et_ignorance/1340424","dataSources":["zX4acseCDM6D58AW7"],"keywords":[],"search_terms":["ignorance","behind","inconsistency","toleration","rosario martínez-ordaz"],"title":"The ignorance behind inconsistency toleration","year":2020}