@article{
 title = {Analyzing interactivity in asynchronous video discussions},
 type = {article},
 year = {2014},
 keywords = {Online discussion,asynchronous video discussion,educational data mining,higher education,interactivity},
 pages = {226-237},
 volume = {8523},
 websites = {http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-319-07482-5_22},
 publisher = {Springer International Publishing},
 city = {Heraklion (Greece)},
 id = {141f146a-5d0f-3278-b6a8-c5e2195fd1e3},
 created = {2017-12-07T09:25:57.263Z},
 file_attached = {false},
 profile_id = {4d6e333c-c37d-3ec7-8c04-1f45c312e278},
 last_modified = {2018-04-21T17:55:48.047Z},
 read = {false},
 starred = {false},
 authored = {true},
 confirmed = {true},
 hidden = {false},
 citation_key = {Rothe2014},
 folder_uuids = {bd46c7e1-79d8-4d1f-8d7f-920ef87cae5a},
 private_publication = {false},
 abstract = {Evaluating online discussions is a complex task for educators. Infor-mation systems may support instructors and course designers to assess the qual-ity of an asynchronous online discussion tool. Interactivity on a human-to-human, human-to-computer or human-to-content level are focal elements of such quality assessment. Nevertheless existing indicators used to measure inter-activity oftentimes rely on manual data collection. One major contribution of this paper is an updated overview about indicators which are ready for automat-ic data collection and processing. Following a design science research approach we introduce measures for a consumer side of interactivity and contrast them with a producer’s perspective. For this purpose we contrast two ratio measures ‘viewed posts prior to a statement’ and ‘viewed posts after a statement’ created by a student. In order to evaluate these indicators, we apply them to Pinio, an innovative asynchronous video discussion tool, used in a virtual seminar.},
 bibtype = {article},
 author = {Rothe, Hannes and Sundermeier, Janina and Gersch, Martin},
 doi = {10.1007/978-3-319-07482-5_22},
 journal = {Lecture Notes in Computer Science (LNCS)},
 number = {PART 1}
}

{"_id":"Wu6BDkCEf49Z5K9XF","bibbaseid":"rothe-sundermeier-gersch-analyzinginteractivityinasynchronousvideodiscussions-2014","author_short":["Rothe, H.","Sundermeier, J.","Gersch, M."],"bibdata":{"title":"Analyzing interactivity in asynchronous video discussions","type":"article","year":"2014","keywords":"Online discussion,asynchronous video discussion,educational data mining,higher education,interactivity","pages":"226-237","volume":"8523","websites":"http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-319-07482-5_22","publisher":"Springer International Publishing","city":"Heraklion (Greece)","id":"141f146a-5d0f-3278-b6a8-c5e2195fd1e3","created":"2017-12-07T09:25:57.263Z","file_attached":false,"profile_id":"4d6e333c-c37d-3ec7-8c04-1f45c312e278","last_modified":"2018-04-21T17:55:48.047Z","read":false,"starred":false,"authored":"true","confirmed":"true","hidden":false,"citation_key":"Rothe2014","folder_uuids":"bd46c7e1-79d8-4d1f-8d7f-920ef87cae5a","private_publication":false,"abstract":"Evaluating online discussions is a complex task for educators. Infor-mation systems may support instructors and course designers to assess the qual-ity of an asynchronous online discussion tool. Interactivity on a human-to-human, human-to-computer or human-to-content level are focal elements of such quality assessment. Nevertheless existing indicators used to measure inter-activity oftentimes rely on manual data collection. One major contribution of this paper is an updated overview about indicators which are ready for automat-ic data collection and processing. Following a design science research approach we introduce measures for a consumer side of interactivity and contrast them with a producer’s perspective. For this purpose we contrast two ratio measures ‘viewed posts prior to a statement’ and ‘viewed posts after a statement’ created by a student. In order to evaluate these indicators, we apply them to Pinio, an innovative asynchronous video discussion tool, used in a virtual seminar.","bibtype":"article","author":"Rothe, Hannes and Sundermeier, Janina and Gersch, Martin","doi":"10.1007/978-3-319-07482-5_22","journal":"Lecture Notes in Computer Science (LNCS)","number":"PART 1","bibtex":"@article{\n title = {Analyzing interactivity in asynchronous video discussions},\n type = {article},\n year = {2014},\n keywords = {Online discussion,asynchronous video discussion,educational data mining,higher education,interactivity},\n pages = {226-237},\n volume = {8523},\n websites = {http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-319-07482-5_22},\n publisher = {Springer International Publishing},\n city = {Heraklion (Greece)},\n id = {141f146a-5d0f-3278-b6a8-c5e2195fd1e3},\n created = {2017-12-07T09:25:57.263Z},\n file_attached = {false},\n profile_id = {4d6e333c-c37d-3ec7-8c04-1f45c312e278},\n last_modified = {2018-04-21T17:55:48.047Z},\n read = {false},\n starred = {false},\n authored = {true},\n confirmed = {true},\n hidden = {false},\n citation_key = {Rothe2014},\n folder_uuids = {bd46c7e1-79d8-4d1f-8d7f-920ef87cae5a},\n private_publication = {false},\n abstract = {Evaluating online discussions is a complex task for educators. Infor-mation systems may support instructors and course designers to assess the qual-ity of an asynchronous online discussion tool. Interactivity on a human-to-human, human-to-computer or human-to-content level are focal elements of such quality assessment. Nevertheless existing indicators used to measure inter-activity oftentimes rely on manual data collection. One major contribution of this paper is an updated overview about indicators which are ready for automat-ic data collection and processing. Following a design science research approach we introduce measures for a consumer side of interactivity and contrast them with a producer’s perspective. For this purpose we contrast two ratio measures ‘viewed posts prior to a statement’ and ‘viewed posts after a statement’ created by a student. In order to evaluate these indicators, we apply them to Pinio, an innovative asynchronous video discussion tool, used in a virtual seminar.},\n bibtype = {article},\n author = {Rothe, Hannes and Sundermeier, Janina and Gersch, Martin},\n doi = {10.1007/978-3-319-07482-5_22},\n journal = {Lecture Notes in Computer Science (LNCS)},\n number = {PART 1}\n}","author_short":["Rothe, H.","Sundermeier, J.","Gersch, M."],"urls":{"Website":"http://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-319-07482-5_22"},"biburl":"https://bibbase.org/service/mendeley/4d6e333c-c37d-3ec7-8c04-1f45c312e278","bibbaseid":"rothe-sundermeier-gersch-analyzinginteractivityinasynchronousvideodiscussions-2014","role":"author","keyword":["Online discussion","asynchronous video discussion","educational data mining","higher education","interactivity"],"metadata":{"authorlinks":{}},"downloads":0},"bibtype":"article","biburl":"https://bibbase.org/service/mendeley/4d6e333c-c37d-3ec7-8c04-1f45c312e278","dataSources":["2252seNhipfTmjEBQ"],"keywords":["online discussion","asynchronous video discussion","educational data mining","higher education","interactivity"],"search_terms":["analyzing","interactivity","asynchronous","video","discussions","rothe","sundermeier","gersch"],"title":"Analyzing interactivity in asynchronous video discussions","year":2014}