@article{Rupert2010,
abstract = {This essay begins by addressing the role of the so-called Parity Principle in arguments for extended cognition. It is concluded that the Parity Principle does not, by itself, demarcate cognition and that another mark of the cognitive must be sought. The second section of the paper advances two arguments against the extended view of cognition, one of which - the conservatism-or-simplicity argument - appeals to principles of theory selection, and the other of which - the argument from demarcation - draws on a systems-based theory of cognition. The final section contests the claim, made by Andy Clark, that empirical work done by Wayne Gray and colleagues supports the extended view. {\textcopyright} 2010 Elsevier B.V.},
author = {Rupert, Robert D.},
doi = {10.1016/j.cogsys.2010.04.002},
file = {:Users/michaelk/Library/Application Support/Mendeley Desktop/Downloaded/Rupert - 2010 - Extended cognition and the priority of cognitive systems.pdf:pdf},
isbn = {1389-0417},
issn = {13890417},
journal = {Cognitive Systems Research},
number = {4},
pages = {343--356},
title = {{Extended cognition and the priority of cognitive systems}},
url = {https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1389041710000355},
volume = {11},
year = {2010}
}

{"_id":"aFMo8siGqwymjhZjS","bibbaseid":"rupert-extendedcognitionandthepriorityofcognitivesystems-2010","downloads":0,"creationDate":"2019-01-05T09:36:46.453Z","title":"Extended cognition and the priority of cognitive systems","author_short":["Rupert, R. D."],"year":2010,"bibtype":"article","biburl":"http://phil-mem.org/phil-mem.bib/","bibdata":{"bibtype":"article","type":"article","abstract":"This essay begins by addressing the role of the so-called Parity Principle in arguments for extended cognition. It is concluded that the Parity Principle does not, by itself, demarcate cognition and that another mark of the cognitive must be sought. The second section of the paper advances two arguments against the extended view of cognition, one of which - the conservatism-or-simplicity argument - appeals to principles of theory selection, and the other of which - the argument from demarcation - draws on a systems-based theory of cognition. The final section contests the claim, made by Andy Clark, that empirical work done by Wayne Gray and colleagues supports the extended view. \\textcopyright 2010 Elsevier B.V.","author":[{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Rupert"],"firstnames":["Robert","D."],"suffixes":[]}],"doi":"10.1016/j.cogsys.2010.04.002","file":":Users/michaelk/Library/Application Support/Mendeley Desktop/Downloaded/Rupert - 2010 - Extended cognition and the priority of cognitive systems.pdf:pdf","isbn":"1389-0417","issn":"13890417","journal":"Cognitive Systems Research","number":"4","pages":"343–356","title":"Extended cognition and the priority of cognitive systems","url":"https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1389041710000355","volume":"11","year":"2010","bibtex":"@article{Rupert2010,\nabstract = {This essay begins by addressing the role of the so-called Parity Principle in arguments for extended cognition. It is concluded that the Parity Principle does not, by itself, demarcate cognition and that another mark of the cognitive must be sought. The second section of the paper advances two arguments against the extended view of cognition, one of which - the conservatism-or-simplicity argument - appeals to principles of theory selection, and the other of which - the argument from demarcation - draws on a systems-based theory of cognition. The final section contests the claim, made by Andy Clark, that empirical work done by Wayne Gray and colleagues supports the extended view. {\\textcopyright} 2010 Elsevier B.V.},\nauthor = {Rupert, Robert D.},\ndoi = {10.1016/j.cogsys.2010.04.002},\nfile = {:Users/michaelk/Library/Application Support/Mendeley Desktop/Downloaded/Rupert - 2010 - Extended cognition and the priority of cognitive systems.pdf:pdf},\nisbn = {1389-0417},\nissn = {13890417},\njournal = {Cognitive Systems Research},\nnumber = {4},\npages = {343--356},\ntitle = {{Extended cognition and the priority of cognitive systems}},\nurl = {https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1389041710000355},\nvolume = {11},\nyear = {2010}\n}\n","author_short":["Rupert, R. D."],"key":"Rupert2010","id":"Rupert2010","bibbaseid":"rupert-extendedcognitionandthepriorityofcognitivesystems-2010","role":"author","urls":{"Paper":"https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1389041710000355"},"downloads":0},"search_terms":["extended","cognition","priority","cognitive","systems","rupert"],"keywords":["distributed cognition","embedded cognition","extended cognition","extended mind","parity principle","situated cognition"],"authorIDs":[],"dataSources":["xpm4HPGis5kQeHY7z"]}