@article{sagie_improved_1992,
	title = {An improved method for adjusting the {QT} interval for heart rate (the {Framingham} {Heart} {Study})},
	volume = {70},
	issn = {0002-9149},
	abstract = {Several formulas have been proposed to adjust the QT interval for heart rate, the most commonly used being the QT correction formula (QTc = QT/square root of RR) proposed in 1920 by Bazett. The QTc formula was derived from observations in only 39 young subjects. Recently, the adequacy of Bazett's formula has been questioned. To evaluate the heart rate QT association, the QT interval was measured on the initial baseline electrocardiogram of 5,018 subjects (2,239 men and 2,779 women) from the Framingham Heart Study with a mean age of 44 years (range 28 to 62). Persons with coronary artery disease were excluded. A linear regression model was developed for correcting QT according to RR cycle length. The large sample allowed for subdivision of the population into sex-specific deciles of RR intervals and for comparison of QT, Bazett's QTc and linear corrected QT (QTLC). The mean RR interval was 0.81 second (range 0.5 to 1.47) heart rate 74 beats/min (range 41 to 120), and mean QT was 0.35 second (range 0.24 to 0.49) in men and 0.36 second (range 0.26 to 0.48) in women. The linear regression model yielded a correction formula (for a reference RR interval of 1 second): QTLC = QT + 0.154 (1-RR) that applies for men and women. This equation corrects QT more reliably than the Bazett's formula, which overcorrects the QT interval at fast heart rates and undercorrects it at low heart rates. Lower and upper limits of normal QT values in relation to RR were generated.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)},
	language = {eng},
	number = {7},
	journal = {The American journal of cardiology},
	author = {Sagie, A and Larson, M G and Goldberg, R J and Bengtson, J R and Levy, D},
	month = sep,
	year = {1992},
	pmid = {1519533},
	keywords = {Adolescent, Cohort Studies, Electrocardiography, Female, Heart Rate, Humans, Male, Massachusetts, Prospective Studies, Regression Analysis, Risk Factors},
	pages = {797--801}
}

{"_id":"5oydiqHQLMnrXqmZX","bibbaseid":"sagie-larson-goldberg-bengtson-levy-animprovedmethodforadjustingtheqtintervalforheartratetheframinghamheartstudy-1992","downloads":0,"creationDate":"2018-12-05T13:23:20.316Z","title":"An improved method for adjusting the QT interval for heart rate (the Framingham Heart Study)","author_short":["Sagie, A","Larson, M G","Goldberg, R J","Bengtson, J R","Levy, D"],"year":1992,"bibtype":"article","biburl":"https://bibbase.org/zotero/emmanuel.chazard","bibdata":{"bibtype":"article","type":"article","title":"An improved method for adjusting the QT interval for heart rate (the Framingham Heart Study)","volume":"70","issn":"0002-9149","abstract":"Several formulas have been proposed to adjust the QT interval for heart rate, the most commonly used being the QT correction formula (QTc = QT/square root of RR) proposed in 1920 by Bazett. The QTc formula was derived from observations in only 39 young subjects. Recently, the adequacy of Bazett's formula has been questioned. To evaluate the heart rate QT association, the QT interval was measured on the initial baseline electrocardiogram of 5,018 subjects (2,239 men and 2,779 women) from the Framingham Heart Study with a mean age of 44 years (range 28 to 62). Persons with coronary artery disease were excluded. A linear regression model was developed for correcting QT according to RR cycle length. The large sample allowed for subdivision of the population into sex-specific deciles of RR intervals and for comparison of QT, Bazett's QTc and linear corrected QT (QTLC). The mean RR interval was 0.81 second (range 0.5 to 1.47) heart rate 74 beats/min (range 41 to 120), and mean QT was 0.35 second (range 0.24 to 0.49) in men and 0.36 second (range 0.26 to 0.48) in women. The linear regression model yielded a correction formula (for a reference RR interval of 1 second): QTLC = QT + 0.154 (1-RR) that applies for men and women. This equation corrects QT more reliably than the Bazett's formula, which overcorrects the QT interval at fast heart rates and undercorrects it at low heart rates. Lower and upper limits of normal QT values in relation to RR were generated.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)","language":"eng","number":"7","journal":"The American journal of cardiology","author":[{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Sagie"],"firstnames":["A"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Larson"],"firstnames":["M","G"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Goldberg"],"firstnames":["R","J"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Bengtson"],"firstnames":["J","R"],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Levy"],"firstnames":["D"],"suffixes":[]}],"month":"September","year":"1992","pmid":"1519533","keywords":"Adolescent, Cohort Studies, Electrocardiography, Female, Heart Rate, Humans, Male, Massachusetts, Prospective Studies, Regression Analysis, Risk Factors","pages":"797–801","bibtex":"@article{sagie_improved_1992,\n\ttitle = {An improved method for adjusting the {QT} interval for heart rate (the {Framingham} {Heart} {Study})},\n\tvolume = {70},\n\tissn = {0002-9149},\n\tabstract = {Several formulas have been proposed to adjust the QT interval for heart rate, the most commonly used being the QT correction formula (QTc = QT/square root of RR) proposed in 1920 by Bazett. The QTc formula was derived from observations in only 39 young subjects. Recently, the adequacy of Bazett's formula has been questioned. To evaluate the heart rate QT association, the QT interval was measured on the initial baseline electrocardiogram of 5,018 subjects (2,239 men and 2,779 women) from the Framingham Heart Study with a mean age of 44 years (range 28 to 62). Persons with coronary artery disease were excluded. A linear regression model was developed for correcting QT according to RR cycle length. The large sample allowed for subdivision of the population into sex-specific deciles of RR intervals and for comparison of QT, Bazett's QTc and linear corrected QT (QTLC). The mean RR interval was 0.81 second (range 0.5 to 1.47) heart rate 74 beats/min (range 41 to 120), and mean QT was 0.35 second (range 0.24 to 0.49) in men and 0.36 second (range 0.26 to 0.48) in women. The linear regression model yielded a correction formula (for a reference RR interval of 1 second): QTLC = QT + 0.154 (1-RR) that applies for men and women. This equation corrects QT more reliably than the Bazett's formula, which overcorrects the QT interval at fast heart rates and undercorrects it at low heart rates. Lower and upper limits of normal QT values in relation to RR were generated.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)},\n\tlanguage = {eng},\n\tnumber = {7},\n\tjournal = {The American journal of cardiology},\n\tauthor = {Sagie, A and Larson, M G and Goldberg, R J and Bengtson, J R and Levy, D},\n\tmonth = sep,\n\tyear = {1992},\n\tpmid = {1519533},\n\tkeywords = {Adolescent, Cohort Studies, Electrocardiography, Female, Heart Rate, Humans, Male, Massachusetts, Prospective Studies, Regression Analysis, Risk Factors},\n\tpages = {797--801}\n}\n\n","author_short":["Sagie, A","Larson, M G","Goldberg, R J","Bengtson, J R","Levy, D"],"key":"sagie_improved_1992","id":"sagie_improved_1992","bibbaseid":"sagie-larson-goldberg-bengtson-levy-animprovedmethodforadjustingtheqtintervalforheartratetheframinghamheartstudy-1992","role":"author","urls":{},"keyword":["Adolescent","Cohort Studies","Electrocardiography","Female","Heart Rate","Humans","Male","Massachusetts","Prospective Studies","Regression Analysis","Risk Factors"],"downloads":0},"search_terms":["improved","method","adjusting","interval","heart","rate","framingham","heart","study","sagie","larson","goldberg","bengtson","levy"],"keywords":["adolescent","cohort studies","electrocardiography","female","heart rate","humans","male","massachusetts","prospective studies","regression analysis","risk factors"],"authorIDs":[],"dataSources":["XiRGowmyYWQpwjiC9"]}