@article{
 title = {Regional Policy Frameworks of Social Solidarity Economy in South America},
 type = {article},
 year = {2014},
 keywords = {crn3101},
 websites = {citeulike-article-id:14171082},
 id = {bd3a80a5-2070-300d-989b-1073d96217af},
 created = {2019-04-01T18:01:25.854Z},
 file_attached = {false},
 profile_id = {1f5347e3-dec5-3349-a941-3b484c2dfce9},
 group_id = {184ee5d4-bd93-3566-938b-14cc43849390},
 last_modified = {2019-04-01T18:01:25.854Z},
 read = {false},
 starred = {false},
 authored = {false},
 confirmed = {false},
 hidden = {false},
 source_type = {JOUR},
 private_publication = {false},
 abstract = {This paper looks at how the social and solidarity economy (SSE) discourse has been deployed at a regional level by the Union of South American Nations (UNASUR) and Southern American Common Market (MERCOSUR), and the implications of these new policy frameworks for the advancement of SSE practices. Though civil society groups have presented SSE as a new economic paradigm, regional policy frameworks have implemented it as an add-on—or complement—to dominant capitalist economies. This has happened in two key ways: (i) the SSE sector, and cooperatives in particular, are cast as drivers of regional integration and socioeconomic policy, although a limited involvement in major integration projects represents missed opportunities for SSE to be mainstreamed; and (ii) despite SSE policy being portrayed as a sort of intervention that combines social and economic policies, its implementation almost exclusively by ministers of social development means that it is institutionally limited to the realm of poverty eradication rather than a restructuring of the dominant economy. SSE is also fiscally dependent on dominant industries, which —in the end— does not reverse or challenge the ongoing process of economic centralization in key sectors.},
 bibtype = {article},
 author = {Saguier, M and Brent, Z},
 journal = {Occasional Paper 6. Potential and Limits of Social and Solidarity Economy}
}

{"_id":"68EtuJvmSmh6eRDfz","bibbaseid":"saguier-brent-regionalpolicyframeworksofsocialsolidarityeconomyinsouthamerica-2014","downloads":0,"creationDate":"2019-04-10T23:07:21.487Z","title":"Regional Policy Frameworks of Social Solidarity Economy in South America","author_short":["Saguier, M.","Brent, Z."],"year":2014,"bibtype":"article","biburl":null,"bibdata":{"title":"Regional Policy Frameworks of Social Solidarity Economy in South America","type":"article","year":"2014","keywords":"crn3101","websites":"citeulike-article-id:14171082","id":"bd3a80a5-2070-300d-989b-1073d96217af","created":"2019-04-01T18:01:25.854Z","file_attached":false,"profile_id":"1f5347e3-dec5-3349-a941-3b484c2dfce9","group_id":"184ee5d4-bd93-3566-938b-14cc43849390","last_modified":"2019-04-01T18:01:25.854Z","read":false,"starred":false,"authored":false,"confirmed":false,"hidden":false,"source_type":"JOUR","private_publication":false,"abstract":"This paper looks at how the social and solidarity economy (SSE) discourse has been deployed at a regional level by the Union of South American Nations (UNASUR) and Southern American Common Market (MERCOSUR), and the implications of these new policy frameworks for the advancement of SSE practices. Though civil society groups have presented SSE as a new economic paradigm, regional policy frameworks have implemented it as an add-on—or complement—to dominant capitalist economies. This has happened in two key ways: (i) the SSE sector, and cooperatives in particular, are cast as drivers of regional integration and socioeconomic policy, although a limited involvement in major integration projects represents missed opportunities for SSE to be mainstreamed; and (ii) despite SSE policy being portrayed as a sort of intervention that combines social and economic policies, its implementation almost exclusively by ministers of social development means that it is institutionally limited to the realm of poverty eradication rather than a restructuring of the dominant economy. SSE is also fiscally dependent on dominant industries, which —in the end— does not reverse or challenge the ongoing process of economic centralization in key sectors.","bibtype":"article","author":"Saguier, M and Brent, Z","journal":"Occasional Paper 6. Potential and Limits of Social and Solidarity Economy","bibtex":"@article{\n title = {Regional Policy Frameworks of Social Solidarity Economy in South America},\n type = {article},\n year = {2014},\n keywords = {crn3101},\n websites = {citeulike-article-id:14171082},\n id = {bd3a80a5-2070-300d-989b-1073d96217af},\n created = {2019-04-01T18:01:25.854Z},\n file_attached = {false},\n profile_id = {1f5347e3-dec5-3349-a941-3b484c2dfce9},\n group_id = {184ee5d4-bd93-3566-938b-14cc43849390},\n last_modified = {2019-04-01T18:01:25.854Z},\n read = {false},\n starred = {false},\n authored = {false},\n confirmed = {false},\n hidden = {false},\n source_type = {JOUR},\n private_publication = {false},\n abstract = {This paper looks at how the social and solidarity economy (SSE) discourse has been deployed at a regional level by the Union of South American Nations (UNASUR) and Southern American Common Market (MERCOSUR), and the implications of these new policy frameworks for the advancement of SSE practices. Though civil society groups have presented SSE as a new economic paradigm, regional policy frameworks have implemented it as an add-on—or complement—to dominant capitalist economies. This has happened in two key ways: (i) the SSE sector, and cooperatives in particular, are cast as drivers of regional integration and socioeconomic policy, although a limited involvement in major integration projects represents missed opportunities for SSE to be mainstreamed; and (ii) despite SSE policy being portrayed as a sort of intervention that combines social and economic policies, its implementation almost exclusively by ministers of social development means that it is institutionally limited to the realm of poverty eradication rather than a restructuring of the dominant economy. SSE is also fiscally dependent on dominant industries, which —in the end— does not reverse or challenge the ongoing process of economic centralization in key sectors.},\n bibtype = {article},\n author = {Saguier, M and Brent, Z},\n journal = {Occasional Paper 6. Potential and Limits of Social and Solidarity Economy}\n}","author_short":["Saguier, M.","Brent, Z."],"urls":{"Website":"citeulike-article-id:14171082"},"bibbaseid":"saguier-brent-regionalpolicyframeworksofsocialsolidarityeconomyinsouthamerica-2014","role":"author","keyword":["crn3101"],"downloads":0},"search_terms":["regional","policy","frameworks","social","solidarity","economy","south","america","saguier","brent"],"keywords":["crn3101"],"authorIDs":[]}