Website abstract bibtex

Many ecological studies require analysis of collections of estimates. For example, population change is routinely estimated for many species from surveys such as the North American Breeding Bird Survey (BBS), and the species are grouped and used in comparative analyses. We developed a hierarchical model for estimation of group attributes from a collection of estimates of population trend. The model uses information from predefined groups of species to provide a context and to supplement data for individual species; summaries of group attributes are improved by statistical methods that simultaneously analyze collections of trend estimates. The model is Bayesian; trends are treated as random variables rather than fixed parameters. We use Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) methods to fit the model. Standard assessments of population stability cannot distinguish magnitude of trend and statistical significance of trend estimates, but the hierarchical model allows us to legitimately describe the probability that a trend is within given bounds. Thus we define population stability in terms of the probability that the magnitude of population change for a species is less than or equal to a predefined threshold. We applied the model to estimates of trend for 399 species from the BBS to estimate the proportion of species with increasing populations and to identify species with unstable populations. Analyses are presented for the collection of all species and for 12 species groups commonly used in BBS summaries. Overall, we estimated that 49% of species in the BBS have positive trends and 33 species have unstable populations. However, the proportion of species with increasing trends differs among habitat groups, with grassland birds having only 19% of species with positive trend estimates and wetland birds having 68% of species with positive trend estimates.

@article{ title = {Hierarchical modeling of population stability and species group attributes from survey data}, type = {article}, year = {2002}, keywords = {Birds,Breeding Bird Survey,Conservation action,Hierarchical models,Markov chain Monte Carlo methods,Population stability,Population trends,Ranking estimates,Species group attributes,Surveys}, pages = {1743-1751}, volume = {83}, websites = {http://www.scopus.com/scopus/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-0037633165&partner=40&rel=R5.0.4}, id = {8828435e-5114-33b2-81a1-ee988f30408c}, created = {2011-02-22T18:00:53.000Z}, file_attached = {false}, profile_id = {c04350e2-ca59-3023-9537-35726b8dc7ec}, group_id = {3addd0f7-d578-34d3-be80-24022cc062a1}, last_modified = {2020-02-27T20:18:59.000Z}, read = {false}, starred = {false}, authored = {false}, confirmed = {true}, hidden = {false}, citation_key = {Sauer2002}, source_type = {Journal Article}, notes = {Cited By (since 1996): 12<br/>Journal Article}, private_publication = {false}, abstract = {Many ecological studies require analysis of collections of estimates. For example, population change is routinely estimated for many species from surveys such as the North American Breeding Bird Survey (BBS), and the species are grouped and used in comparative analyses. We developed a hierarchical model for estimation of group attributes from a collection of estimates of population trend. The model uses information from predefined groups of species to provide a context and to supplement data for individual species; summaries of group attributes are improved by statistical methods that simultaneously analyze collections of trend estimates. The model is Bayesian; trends are treated as random variables rather than fixed parameters. We use Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) methods to fit the model. Standard assessments of population stability cannot distinguish magnitude of trend and statistical significance of trend estimates, but the hierarchical model allows us to legitimately describe the probability that a trend is within given bounds. Thus we define population stability in terms of the probability that the magnitude of population change for a species is less than or equal to a predefined threshold. We applied the model to estimates of trend for 399 species from the BBS to estimate the proportion of species with increasing populations and to identify species with unstable populations. Analyses are presented for the collection of all species and for 12 species groups commonly used in BBS summaries. Overall, we estimated that 49% of species in the BBS have positive trends and 33 species have unstable populations. However, the proportion of species with increasing trends differs among habitat groups, with grassland birds having only 19% of species with positive trend estimates and wetland birds having 68% of species with positive trend estimates.}, bibtype = {article}, author = {Sauer, J R and Link, W A and Anonymous, undefined}, journal = {Ecology}, number = {6} }

Downloads: 0