Declining amphibian populations: The pitfalls of count data in the study of diversity, distributions, dynamics, and demography. Schmidt, B. Herpetological Journal, 14(4):167–174, KARCH, Naturhistorisches Museum, Bernastrasse 15, CH-3005 Bern, Switzerland, 2004.
abstract   bibtex   
Most data used in the study of the demography, dynamics, distributions, diversity, and declines of amphibians are count data that are not adjusted for detection probabilities, which are generally variable and low. Such unadjusted count data are unreliable for understanding amphibian ecology, amphibian declines, or when developing conservation and management strategies. In the future, detection probabilities should be estimated and counts adjusted accordingly. This could be achieved by using capture-mark-recapture, distance sampling or novel Bayesian methods.
@ARTICLE{Schmidt2004,
  author = {Schmidt, B.R.},
  title = {Declining amphibian populations: The pitfalls of count data in the
	study of diversity, distributions, dynamics, and demography},
  journal = {Herpetological Journal},
  year = {2004},
  volume = {14},
  pages = {167--174},
  number = {4},
  abstract = {Most data used in the study of the demography, dynamics, distributions,
	diversity, and declines of amphibians are count data that are not
	adjusted for detection probabilities, which are generally variable
	and low. Such unadjusted count data are unreliable for understanding
	amphibian ecology, amphibian declines, or when developing conservation
	and management strategies. In the future, detection probabilities
	should be estimated and counts adjusted accordingly. This could be
	achieved by using capture-mark-recapture, distance sampling or novel
	Bayesian methods.},
  address = {KARCH, Naturhistorisches Museum, Bernastrasse 15, CH-3005 Bern, Switzerland},
  keywords = {Conservation, Detection probability, Population census, Survey methods},
  owner = {eric},
  subdatabase = {distance},
  timestamp = {2006.11.05}
}

Downloads: 0