Use of anti-malarial drugs and the risk of developing eye disorders. Schneider, C., Adamcova, M., Jick, S. S., Schlagenhauf, P., Miller, M. K., Rhein, H., & Meier, C. R. Travel Medicine and Infectious Disease, 12(1):40--47, February, 2014.
doi  abstract   bibtex   
BACKGROUND: Ocular toxicity was described in the late 1950s for some anti-malarial drugs, but only limited information is available on the comparison of ocular toxicity of different anti-malarials. METHODS: We conducted a follow-up study with a nested case-control analysis using the General Practice Research Database to compare the risk of developing a first-time diagnosis of an eye disorder during exposure of mefloquine, chloroquine and/or proguanil or atovaquone/proguanil use to non-users. We calculated incidence rates with 95% confidence intervals (CI) and odds ratios using multivariate conditional logistic regression analyses. RESULTS: We included 83,148 patients and identified 652 cases with an incident eye disorder. The incidence rates with 95% CI of all eye disorders combined in users of mefloquine, chloroquine and/or proguanil, atovaquone/proguanil or travellers not using anti-malarials were 5.3 (4.3-6.5), 7.1 (5.0-9.9), 6.3 (5.6-7.2) and 5.1 (4.6-5.7), per 1000 person-years, respectively. As compared to non-users of anti-malarials, the adjusted odds ratio with 95% CI in the nested case-control analysis for users of mefloquine, chloroquine and/or proguanil, or atovaquone/proguanil were 1.33 (1.01-1.75), 1.61 (1.06-2.45), and 1.25 (1.03-1.52), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The study provides evidence that there was an increased risk of eye disorders in users of all anti-malarials compared to non-users of anti-malarials.
@article{schneider_use_2014,
	title = {Use of anti-malarial drugs and the risk of developing eye disorders},
	volume = {12},
	issn = {1873-0442},
	doi = {10.1016/j.tmaid.2013.07.007},
	abstract = {BACKGROUND: Ocular toxicity was described in the late 1950s for some anti-malarial drugs, but only limited information is available on the comparison of ocular toxicity of different anti-malarials.
METHODS: We conducted a follow-up study with a nested case-control analysis using the General Practice Research Database to compare the risk of developing a first-time diagnosis of an eye disorder during exposure of mefloquine, chloroquine and/or proguanil or atovaquone/proguanil use to non-users. We calculated incidence rates with 95\% confidence intervals (CI) and odds ratios using multivariate conditional logistic regression analyses.
RESULTS: We included 83,148 patients and identified 652 cases with an incident eye disorder. The incidence rates with 95\% CI of all eye disorders combined in users of mefloquine, chloroquine and/or proguanil, atovaquone/proguanil or travellers not using anti-malarials were 5.3 (4.3-6.5), 7.1 (5.0-9.9), 6.3 (5.6-7.2) and 5.1 (4.6-5.7), per 1000 person-years, respectively. As compared to non-users of anti-malarials, the adjusted odds ratio with 95\% CI in the nested case-control analysis for users of mefloquine, chloroquine and/or proguanil, or atovaquone/proguanil were 1.33 (1.01-1.75), 1.61 (1.06-2.45), and 1.25 (1.03-1.52), respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: The study provides evidence that there was an increased risk of eye disorders in users of all anti-malarials compared to non-users of anti-malarials.},
	language = {eng},
	number = {1},
	journal = {Travel Medicine and Infectious Disease},
	author = {Schneider, Cornelia and Adamcova, Miriam and Jick, Susan S. and Schlagenhauf, Patricia and Miller, Mary K. and Rhein, Hans-Georg and Meier, Christoph R.},
	month = feb,
	year = {2014},
	pmid = {24035311},
	keywords = {Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Antimalarials, Atovaquone, Case-Control Studies, Child, Child, Preschool, Chloroquine, Eye Diseases, Female, Great Britain, Humans, Infant, Malaria, Male, Mefloquine, Middle Aged, Proguanil, Risk, Travel Medicine, Young Adult, incidence},
	pages = {40--47}
}

Downloads: 0