Designing tools evaluate fishery management strategies: can the scientific community deliver?. Schnute, J. T., Maunder, M. N., & lanelli , J. N. ICES JOURNAL OF MARINE SCIENCE, 64(6):1077-1084, OXFORD UNIV PRESS, GREAT CLARENDON ST, OXFORD OX2 6DP, ENGLAND, SEP, 2007.
doi  abstract   bibtex   
Techniques for quantitative fishery management have evolved rapidly during a period when computers, programming languages, and computational algorithms have also changed dramatically. Despite these advances, many stock assessment methods remain untested. A process of management strategy evaluation (MSE) could potentially rectify this problem, but it would require a framework in which to conduct systematic tests. We survey the tools currently used for stock assessments and discuss the development of new standards for testing management procedures. A successful project would depend on human skills scattered among various nations, organizations, and academic disciplines. Analogies from civil engineering illustrate the discipline and collaboration required for an effective outcome. If the world community of fishery scientists could design, build, and support such a project, it would revolutionize the theory, teaching, and practice of scientific fishery management.
@article{ ISI:000250937800001,
Author = {Schnute, Jon T. and Maunder, Mark N. and lanelli, James N.},
Title = {{Designing tools evaluate fishery management strategies: can the
   scientific community deliver?}},
Journal = {{ICES JOURNAL OF MARINE SCIENCE}},
Year = {{2007}},
Volume = {{64}},
Number = {{6}},
Pages = {{1077-1084}},
Month = {{SEP}},
Abstract = {{Techniques for quantitative fishery management have evolved rapidly
   during a period when computers, programming languages, and computational
   algorithms have also changed dramatically. Despite these advances, many
   stock assessment methods remain untested. A process of management
   strategy evaluation (MSE) could potentially rectify this problem, but it
   would require a framework in which to conduct systematic tests. We
   survey the tools currently used for stock assessments and discuss the
   development of new standards for testing management procedures. A
   successful project would depend on human skills scattered among various
   nations, organizations, and academic disciplines. Analogies from civil
   engineering illustrate the discipline and collaboration required for an
   effective outcome. If the world community of fishery scientists could
   design, build, and support such a project, it would revolutionize the
   theory, teaching, and practice of scientific fishery management.}},
Publisher = {{OXFORD UNIV PRESS}},
Address = {{GREAT CLARENDON ST, OXFORD OX2 6DP, ENGLAND}},
Type = {{Article}},
Language = {{English}},
Affiliation = {{Schnute, JT (Reprint Author), Pacific Biol Stn, Fisheries \& Oceans Canada, 3190 Hammond Bay Rd, Nanaimo, BC V9T 6N7, Canada.
   Pacific Biol Stn, Fisheries \& Oceans Canada, Nanaimo, BC V9T 6N7, Canada.
   Inter Amer Trop Tuna Commiss, La Jolla, CA 92037 USA.
   NOAA, Natl Marine Fisheries Serv, REFM Div, Fisheries Sci Ctr, Seattle, WA 98115 USA.}},
DOI = {{10.1093/icesjms/fsm109}},
ISSN = {{1054-3139}},
Keywords = {{AD model builder; ADOL-C; fisheries library in R; management strategy
   evaluation; next generation; stock assessment; R; software}},
Keywords-Plus = {{MODEL}},
Research-Areas = {{Fisheries; Marine \& Freshwater Biology; Oceanography}},
Web-of-Science-Categories  = {{Fisheries; Marine \& Freshwater Biology; Oceanography}},
Author-Email = {{schnutej@pac.dfo-mpo.gc.ca}},
Number-of-Cited-References = {{34}},
Times-Cited = {{24}},
Usage-Count-Last-180-days = {{0}},
Usage-Count-Since-2013 = {{6}},
Journal-ISO = {{ICES J. Mar. Sci.}},
Doc-Delivery-Number = {{231HP}},
Unique-ID = {{ISI:000250937800001}},
OA = {{No}},
DA = {{2017-08-17}},
}

Downloads: 0