Validity of the motor observation questionnaire for teachers as a screening instrument for children at risk for developmental coordination disorder. Schoemaker, M. M., Flapper, B. C., Reinders-Messelink, H. A., & Kloet, A. d. Human Movement Science, 27(2):190–199, April, 2008.
Paper doi abstract bibtex This study investigates validity of the Motor Observation Questionnaire for Teachers (MOQ-T) in 182 children aged 5–10 years, 91 children referred for motor problems to a rehabilitation center and 91 comparison children. Performance on the MOQ-T was compared to performance on the Movement Assessment Battery for Children (M-ABC) and the Developmental Coordination Disorder Questionnaire (DCD-Q). Significant correlations were obtained between the MOQ-T and the DCD-Q (r = −.63), and the MOQ-T and the M-ABC (r = .57). The MOQ-T discriminated between children at risk for DCD and comparison children. Sensitivity of the MOQ-T was 80.5%, specificity 62% with the M-ABC as ‘gold standard’. These results support the validity of the MOQ-T as a screening instrument for identification of children at risk for DCD.
@article{schoemaker_validity_2008,
title = {Validity of the motor observation questionnaire for teachers as a screening instrument for children at risk for developmental coordination disorder},
volume = {27},
issn = {0167-9457},
url = {http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167945708000146},
doi = {10.1016/j.humov.2008.02.003},
abstract = {This study investigates validity of the Motor Observation Questionnaire for Teachers (MOQ-T) in 182 children aged 5–10\&\#xa0;years, 91 children referred for motor problems to a rehabilitation center and 91 comparison children. Performance on the MOQ-T was compared to performance on the Movement Assessment Battery for Children (M-ABC) and the Developmental Coordination Disorder Questionnaire (DCD-Q). Significant correlations were obtained between the MOQ-T and the DCD-Q (r\&\#xa0;=\&\#xa0;−.63), and the MOQ-T and the M-ABC (r\&\#xa0;=\&\#xa0;.57). The MOQ-T discriminated between children at risk for DCD and comparison children. Sensitivity of the MOQ-T was 80.5\%, specificity 62\% with the M-ABC as ‘gold standard’. These results support the validity of the MOQ-T as a screening instrument for identification of children at risk for DCD.},
number = {2},
urldate = {2011-09-25},
journal = {Human Movement Science},
author = {Schoemaker, Marina M. and Flapper, Boudien C.T. and Reinders-Messelink, Heleen A. and Kloet, Arend de},
month = apr,
year = {2008},
keywords = {DCD, DCD-Q, M-ABC, MOQ-T, Validity},
pages = {190--199},
}
Downloads: 0
{"_id":"vAR5ZihEkcahKFYyD","bibbaseid":"schoemaker-flapper-reindersmesselink-kloet-validityofthemotorobservationquestionnaireforteachersasascreeninginstrumentforchildrenatriskfordevelopmentalcoordinationdisorder-2008","author_short":["Schoemaker, M. M.","Flapper, B. C.","Reinders-Messelink, H. A.","Kloet, A. d."],"bibdata":{"bibtype":"article","type":"article","title":"Validity of the motor observation questionnaire for teachers as a screening instrument for children at risk for developmental coordination disorder","volume":"27","issn":"0167-9457","url":"http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167945708000146","doi":"10.1016/j.humov.2008.02.003","abstract":"This study investigates validity of the Motor Observation Questionnaire for Teachers (MOQ-T) in 182 children aged 5–10 years, 91 children referred for motor problems to a rehabilitation center and 91 comparison children. Performance on the MOQ-T was compared to performance on the Movement Assessment Battery for Children (M-ABC) and the Developmental Coordination Disorder Questionnaire (DCD-Q). Significant correlations were obtained between the MOQ-T and the DCD-Q (r = âˆ’.63), and the MOQ-T and the M-ABC (r = .57). The MOQ-T discriminated between children at risk for DCD and comparison children. Sensitivity of the MOQ-T was 80.5%, specificity 62% with the M-ABC as ‘gold standard’. These results support the validity of the MOQ-T as a screening instrument for identification of children at risk for DCD.","number":"2","urldate":"2011-09-25","journal":"Human Movement Science","author":[{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Schoemaker"],"firstnames":["Marina","M."],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Flapper"],"firstnames":["Boudien","C.T."],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Reinders-Messelink"],"firstnames":["Heleen","A."],"suffixes":[]},{"propositions":[],"lastnames":["Kloet"],"firstnames":["Arend","de"],"suffixes":[]}],"month":"April","year":"2008","keywords":"DCD, DCD-Q, M-ABC, MOQ-T, Validity","pages":"190–199","bibtex":"@article{schoemaker_validity_2008,\n\ttitle = {Validity of the motor observation questionnaire for teachers as a screening instrument for children at risk for developmental coordination disorder},\n\tvolume = {27},\n\tissn = {0167-9457},\n\turl = {http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167945708000146},\n\tdoi = {10.1016/j.humov.2008.02.003},\n\tabstract = {This study investigates validity of the Motor Observation Questionnaire for Teachers (MOQ-T) in 182 children aged 5–10\\&\\#xa0;years, 91 children referred for motor problems to a rehabilitation center and 91 comparison children. Performance on the MOQ-T was compared to performance on the Movement Assessment Battery for Children (M-ABC) and the Developmental Coordination Disorder Questionnaire (DCD-Q). Significant correlations were obtained between the MOQ-T and the DCD-Q (r\\&\\#xa0;=\\&\\#xa0;−.63), and the MOQ-T and the M-ABC (r\\&\\#xa0;=\\&\\#xa0;.57). The MOQ-T discriminated between children at risk for DCD and comparison children. Sensitivity of the MOQ-T was 80.5\\%, specificity 62\\% with the M-ABC as ‘gold standard’. These results support the validity of the MOQ-T as a screening instrument for identification of children at risk for DCD.},\n\tnumber = {2},\n\turldate = {2011-09-25},\n\tjournal = {Human Movement Science},\n\tauthor = {Schoemaker, Marina M. and Flapper, Boudien C.T. and Reinders-Messelink, Heleen A. and Kloet, Arend de},\n\tmonth = apr,\n\tyear = {2008},\n\tkeywords = {DCD, DCD-Q, M-ABC, MOQ-T, Validity},\n\tpages = {190--199},\n}\n\n","author_short":["Schoemaker, M. M.","Flapper, B. C.","Reinders-Messelink, H. A.","Kloet, A. d."],"key":"schoemaker_validity_2008","id":"schoemaker_validity_2008","bibbaseid":"schoemaker-flapper-reindersmesselink-kloet-validityofthemotorobservationquestionnaireforteachersasascreeninginstrumentforchildrenatriskfordevelopmentalcoordinationdisorder-2008","role":"author","urls":{"Paper":"http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0167945708000146"},"keyword":["DCD","DCD-Q","M-ABC","MOQ-T","Validity"],"metadata":{"authorlinks":{}}},"bibtype":"article","biburl":"https://bibbase.org/zotero/ofurtado","dataSources":["7i2Yc4ejK6JQ7w28D"],"keywords":["dcd","dcd-q","m-abc","moq-t","validity"],"search_terms":["validity","motor","observation","questionnaire","teachers","screening","instrument","children","risk","developmental","coordination","disorder","schoemaker","flapper","reinders-messelink","kloet"],"title":"Validity of the motor observation questionnaire for teachers as a screening instrument for children at risk for developmental coordination disorder","year":2008}